Jane Brody in The New York Times:
There are some crimes that are almost impossible to forget. For me, they include the death in 1999 of Kendra Webdale, an aspiring young journalist who was pushed in front of a New York subway train by a 29-year-old man with schizophrenia who had stopped taking his medication. That same year, two mentally ill teenage boys massacred 12 students and one teacher at Columbine High School in Colorado. Thirteen years later, a seriously emotionally disturbed 20-year-old man murdered 20 young children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut. This year, a homeless 24-year-old man bludgeoned four men to death while they slept on the streets of my city. Although New York is now far safer than when I was a child in the 1940s and ’50s who walked to and from school unescorted, like most big cities, it still harbors untold numbers of men and women with known or undiagnosed severe mental illness that can and should be treated before yet another personal or societal tragedy occurs.
What, I wondered, is or can be done to help them and avert further disasters?
Contrary to politically motivated claims, I learned that people with serious mental ills are not necessarily prone to commit violent acts — they are far more likely to become victims of crime. Rather, the issue is that treatments known to be effective are underfunded or wrongly dismissed as ineffective or too dangerous; basic research in university and government laboratories into new and better drugs is limited and also underfunded; and pharmaceutical companies have shown little interest in developing and testing treatments for severe mental illness. Also at issue is that, as was true for cancer until recently, acknowledgment of mental illness carries a stigma that impedes its early recognition, when it can be most effectively treated or reversed.