the idea of avant-garde writing itself

Download (11)Michael Caines at the TLS:

While some have struggled to define “literary fiction” as a marketable genre of its own, or as writing that calls attention to form, today is apparently a time of a revived appetite for avant-garde writing – writing that, if it does nothing else, calls all assumptions about form into question. And with this renewed focus comes a renewed sense of the importance of 1960s attempts to do something not entirely dissimilar – whether that was the typographical devices of Brooke-Rose, a book in a box (The Unfortunates by Johnson) or the “increasing daring”, as Julia Jordan has called it, of Quin’s novels. The publication of a new volume of Quin’s “stories and fragments”, The Unmapped Country, edited by Jennifer Hodgson, has coincided with a conference held at the University of East Anglia, “In Search of a New Fiction?: British avant-garde writing of the 1960s”. The conference anticipates the publication by Edinburgh University Press, later in the year, of a collection of essays under the same title, but minus the question mark. Nonia Williams and Kaye Mitchell, the conference’s organizers, are also that volume’s co-editors; and they have further raised the idea of setting up a new network for those who are interested in the field. Gathering forty-odd people at UEA, for a “discursive” day of well-informed and engaging conversation, seems like a good start.

The first session about Johnson and Christine Brooke-Rose immediately raised the kind of questions that academics must ask. To what extent is it helpful to consider Brooke-Rose (who spent much of her life in France, under French literary influences) as a “British” writer? What about politics – did “progressive” tendencies as a writer go hand in hand with “progressive” politics?

more here.

Like what you're reading? Don't keep it to yourself!
Share on Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Share on Reddit
Share on LinkedIn
Email this to someone