| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Remembering Rachel Corrie | Main | Lunch with Noam Chomsky »

March 16, 2013

Barack, a few travel tips for your upcoming trip to Israel

Amer Zahr in The Civil Arab:

ScreenHunter_140 Mar. 16 16.48Mr. President, I hear you are traveling to Israel next week.  As a concerned patriotic American citizen of Palestinian descent, I have some pointers for you.

Now, I assume you’ll be flying into Tel Aviv.  Usually, when non-Jews arrive there, especially if they are a little darker-skinned, they are asked to wait in a… let’s call it a “VIP Room.”  Incidentally, the room is quite nice. There’s a water cooler, comfortable chairs, and a soda machine.  It’s probably the only place in the world where you can be racially profiled and get an ice-cold Coca-Cola all at once.

To avoid the room, I would mention that you are the President of the United States.  It might help.

You may get strip-searched.  Saying you are an American doesn’t help much here.  I’ve tried.  I even sang the national anthem last time an Israeli soldier was looking down my pants.  Right after I said, “Oh say can you see,” he said, “Not much.”

To escape this embarrassment, I would mention that you are the President of the United States.  It might help.

In case they don’t already know, you might not want to tell Israeli security you are half-Muslim.  As a fellow half-Muslim, I can tell you they don’t really care about the percentage.  Any bit of Muslim freaks them out. And I’m not sure if you heard, but the fans of one of Israel’s soccer teams, Beitar Jerusalem, actually protested when the club signed two Muslim players.  When one of them scored in a game last week, hundreds of fans actually walked out of the stadium.  One of the fans later stated about the Muslim players, “It’s not racism. They just shouldn’t be here.” Hopefully, they don’t know your middle name is “Hussein.” Maybe they didn’t watch the inauguration.

In any case, I would mention that you are the President of the United States.  It might help.

More here.  [Thanks to John Ballard.]

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 11:49 AM | Permalink

Comments

Thanks for the information. It was very helpful. I wonder what travel tips he has in store for an Israeli (or half Israeli) Jew who wants to visit Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, or Nablus for that matter. Should I bring some loose change for the soda machine?

Posted by: traveller | Mar 16, 2013 3:54:06 PM

Any tips for how Israelis can survive in a sea of Muslims who don't acknowledge their presence on the map and wish they were dead?

I mean, obviously these security measures are just completely arbitrary and have no basis in existing realities, so there's a need for alternatives if they're to do away with them.

Posted by: Angling Saxon | Mar 16, 2013 4:56:00 PM

Why is anyone surprised that Israel acts as if it is in a state-of-war.

Israel _is_ in a state of war so of course it guards itself.

Why the faux-cuteness?

Posted by: David Sucher | Mar 16, 2013 5:53:07 PM

Yes, we can clearly see how profiling passengers and, particularly, soccer players by religion and/or race keeps everyone - or, indeed, anyone - safe. Or, at least, how it's really conducive to a rational and sustainable resolution of the Israeli-Palestine issue to defend policies and attitudes like this. Not to mention a supposedly constitutional democratic state using religious autocracies as yardsticks. Really, really insightful. Next?

Posted by: Max | Mar 16, 2013 5:57:10 PM

Like all of his predecessors, he legitimates Israeli occupation of the West Bank by entering through Israel with permission of the occupying authority. AIPAC's servile boy.

Posted by: Erich | Mar 16, 2013 10:16:48 PM

An Israeli citizen has to wait many hours in waiting in the crowded American embassy and to complete many questionnaires in order to receive a visa to visit USA as a tourist.
An American, in order to visit Israel, he has to buy a plane ticket.
Judging by the great number of Jewish haters, Palestinian "militants",anarchists,terrorists,crazy persons, psychopaths, anti-Israeli Jihadists,fascists,fanatical Muslims and more...I'm amazed that the security check is not thoroughly done (as in Germany where at the least suspicion they stripe you out of all clothes)...and if those that are making the check that are our daughters and sons, students that are working there as part-of-time, would read some of the comments here, I'm sure that they will put more zeal in their search.
And of course that a potential terrorist is profiled by age, nationality, religion,that is identified by somatic and psychological signs. If in a Israel airport (and all over the world)a young Muslim is suspected, in Spain it will be a Basque and in London an Irishman.Of course that terrorists knew this and may delegate others as in the Tel Aviv airport in 1972 when 26 people were killed and when 80 others were injured (Lod Airport massacre)by three Japanese terrorists members of the Japanese Red Army recruited by the Palestinian group called the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.The dead comprised seventeen Christian pilgrims from Puerto Rico, a Canadian citizen, and eight Israelis, including Professor Aharon Katzir, an internationally renowned protein biophysicist.
Israel is in war with terror, Israel is guarding against terror and Israel will do all that this will not repeat herself; never again terrorist attacks on Israeli planes and airports, never again rocket attacks against our towns, never again a new Iranian atomic Holocaust.Understanding this may help to understand also why you are searched for a bomb in a airport,the place where the terrorist beasts are trying to strike:
http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005
http://www.skyjack.co.il/chronology.htm

Posted by: mirel | Mar 17, 2013 3:07:51 AM

If a half Israeli-half American tries to visit Saudi Arabia or Syria, how do you think they'll be treated?
Think they'll be offered a soda?

Posted by: Jeremy | Mar 17, 2013 5:35:00 AM

"If a half Israeli-half American tries to visit Saudi Arabia or Syria."
Unlikely they would try - as commented above, the Arabs and Israeli's are virtually still in a state of war - so why would they expect good treatment (it works both ways David Sucher). But for many Palestinians they have no choice but to be put through this treatment if they want to see their families under occupation.

Posted by: James S | Mar 17, 2013 6:20:40 AM

If a half Israeli-half American tries to visit Saudi Arabia or Syria, how do you think they'll be treated?

Right, so your point is that Israel is as bad as Syria and US ally Saudi Arabia. Duly noted.

Posted by: weaver | Mar 17, 2013 10:16:08 PM

Actually, weaver, you totally missed my point.
A half Israeli arriving in Saudi or Syria would most likely be arrested, detained and possibly hanged without trial just for being Israeli.

Posted by: Jeremy | Mar 18, 2013 9:55:37 AM

If your half-Israeli has Israeli citizenship and survives his or her visit to Syria or Saudi Arabia, they will be arrested on returning to Israel even if they travelled under a foreign passport. According to Israeli law, those countries, and several others, are "enemy states" and an Israeli who manages to visit one of them is breaking the law.
An Australian half-Israeli who went to Syria a few years ago was imprisoned without trial in Israel and died mysteriously. His family and the Australian government have not been given any explanation as to why he was held without trial and why he is dead.

Posted by: James S | Mar 18, 2013 1:02:28 PM

@James S
Simply not true.Some of the stories of the Israeli that are using their second passport (and citizenship) visiting Syria,Yemen,Saudi Arabia are published as articles and travel notes in the Israeli newspapers and magazines...It's not the country, but the ORGANIZATION (of terror) that is forbidden by the Israeli law...as Hezbollah
There is also no such thing as a half-Israeli: there are only Israeli with double citizenship (Russian and Israeli,American and Israeli, French and Israeli...)

Posted by: mirel | Mar 18, 2013 1:36:07 PM

Syria, Saudi,Lebanon: of course all are journalists and writing articles.
http://www.france24.com/en/201202206-syria-tv-israeli-journalists-channel-2-idleb
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3382305,00.html
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3424652,00.html

Posted by: mirel | Mar 18, 2013 1:43:32 PM

traveller wrote:
Thanks for the information. It was very helpful. I wonder what travel tips he has in store for an Israeli (or half Israeli) Jew who wants to visit Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, or Nablus for that matter. Should I bring some loose change for the soda machine?

Because some authoritarian Arab countries are discriminatory towards Jews, that somehow excuses the ostensibly democratic country of Israel from any blame for discriminating against Arabs? (note that the point of the article was not that high security at airports is inherently bad, but that it's bad that Arab passengers are treated differently from Israeli Jews traveling the same airlines) Would you likewise say there was nothing wrong with the U.S. putting Japanese-Americans in internment camps in WWII, since the Japanese government started the war and was much worse in terms of human rights?

Posted by: Jesse M. | Mar 18, 2013 4:41:21 PM

mirel, israeli journalists can apply for a special dispensation. but israeli law does forbid travel to Syria, Saudi, Gaza, Yemen, Iran etc.

Posted by: E N | Mar 18, 2013 8:54:25 PM

Jesse M.,

Nice try, but the fact is that Jewish Israelis are unlikely to be entering Israel to plant bombs. I'll leave it up to you to guess what sort of profile Israeli security agents would be looking for when screening travelers.

Posted by: Pierre T. | Mar 18, 2013 9:06:07 PM

And Jews entering Arab countries are likely to be Mosad agents on their way to execute an extrajudiciary capital punishment.

Posted by: Des | Mar 18, 2013 9:19:50 PM

Evoking a "state of war" as justification for Israel's racial profiling and selective enforcement is rather like using the "war on terror" as cover for an assault on civil liberties.

I'm sure Obama won't be venturing into east Jerusalem, let alone Sheikh Jarrah, and checking out the former homes of Palestinians... demolished or stolen... many in the hands of thieves who go by the pro-active enterprising term "settlers."

The ethnic cleansing going on under the eyes of the world, week in and week out, in east Jerusalem and the occupied territories owes much to the support and protection afforded by America, so its probably fitting that the leader of the world's greatest superpower is stopping to say shalom.

Posted by: j_93 | Mar 18, 2013 10:31:31 PM

Actually, weaver, you totally missed my point.

Oh, I got your "point".

But what about... But what about... But what about...

Good old Tu Quoque Tourette's.

Posted by: weaver | Mar 18, 2013 10:41:52 PM

Pierre T.:
Nice try, but the fact is that Jewish Israelis are unlikely to be entering Israel to plant bombs. I'll leave it up to you to guess what sort of profile Israeli security agents would be looking for when screening travelers.

Yes, and to continue my analogy with Japanese-American internment, a pro-internment person could similarly argue that white Americans were unlikely to be committing acts of sabotage to aid Japan during WWII. Of course any given Japanese-American was also terrifically unlikely to be doing so (I think there was never a single verified incident of it happening during the war), but one could argue that it was a priori marginally more likely for a Japanese-American to commit such a crime, so would that justify the internment camps?

More generally, do you think dehumanizing discrimination against an ethnic or religious group is justified as long as members of that group are statistically slightly more likely to commit certain crimes than the rest of the population, even if the vast majority of members of that group would have no intention of committing such a crime?

Posted by: Jesse M. | Mar 19, 2013 1:07:02 AM

Jesse M:

Your pushing a false analogy. The experience of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza is not analogous to what happened to Japanese-Americans and Japanese-Canadians during the Second World War.

You know where the Palestinians _are_ living in internment camps? In Jordan. Not Israel. Jordan.

Posted by: Angling Saxon | Mar 19, 2013 3:27:16 AM

"You're."

Posted by: Angling Saxon | Mar 19, 2013 3:27:46 AM

Angling Saxon. The Gaza Strip is one massive internment camp.

Posted by: Uwe David | Mar 19, 2013 4:28:21 AM

Uwe,

Blame the Egyptians (Israel only controls its side of the border with Gaza). Or, rather, blame Hamas.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20130314/ml-egypt-hamas

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/03/16/egypt-palestinians-deported-gaza/1992757/

Posted by: Rolf | Mar 19, 2013 8:40:06 AM

Re Japanese/American internment - I've come across similar comparisons elsewhere in an effort to downplay the situation faced by the Palestinians.

Any suggestion that the situation faced by Japanese Americans/Canadians during WW2 was worse than the situation faced by the Palestinians is comparing apples and oranges. Bad and unjust though the situation was, the N. American wartime internees weren't subjected to a military invasion, bombing, assassinations and massive disruption of life as Gaza has been. They weren't subjected to the theft of their ancestral land and orchestrated home demolitions. Their children weren't shot at while playing soccer or on their way to school or targeted by security forces for brutal treatment - check out some of the video testimonials by Israeli military veterans on the site Breaking the Silence in which they speak candidly about what really goes down.

Since the lead article is the darkly witty post by Amer Zahr concerning Obama's upcoming visit, it's worth reflecting on the situation faced by the Palestinians and the extent to which their plight is connected with what has traditionally been America's myopic support for Israel.

American and Canadian mainstream media is hopelessly compromised on the Palestinian issue. Anyone interested in something more reality-based would do better to source the columns of Haaretz writer Gideon Levy. What is going on is ethnic cleansing and Israeli military personnel and officials have admitted as much. In the recent documentary film "Sheikh Jarrah, My Neighborhood" that deals with evictions in east Jeruslaem, a uniformed Israeli almost casually affirms the plan for ongoing seizure of Palestinian homes in east Jerusalem and the eviction of the owners. Moreover he seems quite proud of it because hey... it's "God's will"... it's written in the book. It is "our" land.

Mairead Corrigan, the Irish activist, said in a recent talk in Belfast that with respect to Gaza if similar conditions had been played out in N. Ireland during the troubles - blockade and population control - America world have demanded an end to it. She's absolutely right. Going further, if the hardline Unionists and their paramilitaries had begun to evict Irish nationalists from their homes, bringing in the equivalent of bulldozers in an effort to "cleanse" nationalist areas, America would have screamed for action.

The orchestrated "cleansing" being methodically carried out by Israel is in defiance of international law and UN Resolutions - it is an offence to civil society around the world and the reason it goes on is because America and key allies, along with partisan corporate interests, are holding up the side... with selective criticism now and then of course just in case anyone gets the outrageous impression that they might be in the tank. They attempt to justify the unjustifiable in the name of support for a country that is frankly well on the way to corrupting not only justice but discourse-about-justice and a lot more besides as it attempts to magic the indefensible into some kind of new normal in which nothing is quite the way it seems. At times the rationales and symbolism are so obviously manipulative, so cynical and self-serving, you wonder how anyone could buy into it - and it extends to many facets of Israeli life. Racism against Ethiopian Jews? Machiavellian attempts to control the Ethiopian birth rate with Depo Provera contraceptive injections? Good God what are you suggesting... look, an Ethiopian just won Miss Israel. You must be paranoid!

What is going on in Israel would be called by the right name if it was happening anywhere else, but because it is happening in Israel it requires unique understanding and a magical form of parallel thinking on the part of the wilfully deluded.

Posted by: j_93 | Mar 19, 2013 9:08:38 AM

Rolf. The Huffington Post and USA Today? You've got to be joking!

Posted by: Anna | Mar 19, 2013 9:52:18 AM

These more to your taste, Anna?

http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/friend-or-foe-egypt-sizes-hamas

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/2013/03/18/Seized-military-fabric-used-in-children-s-clothing-Hamas-spokesman.html

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/indepth/2013-03/16/c_132237030.htm

Posted by: Rolf | Mar 19, 2013 10:27:03 AM

j_93,

"In the haste to intimate that Israel is some kind of evil, certain obvious questions are not being asked. For example, if Israel were so keen to increase its Jewish population against its Arab population, wouldn’t it want to exploit high fertility among Ethiopians? If Israeli doctors were merchants of ideologically based sterilisation, wouldn’t we have encountered stories where the victims were Arab or Bedouin? And, if Israel were so intent on reducing its black population, why would it expend so much effort to airlift tens of thousands of Ethiopians into Israel to begin with? Wouldn’t it have been simpler if Israel had reacted to the great Ethiopian famine in 1984 the way every single other country in the world did, by not airlifting tens of thousands of starving refugees to safety? And maybe having a big rock concert instead?"

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brendanoneill2/100200874/how-true-is-it-that-israel-deceitfully-gave-ethiopian-jews-birth-control-injections/

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/alanjohnson/100200961/smearing-israel-again/

And...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/113434535

Posted by: Rolf | Mar 19, 2013 10:55:34 AM

Rolf. True, Under Mubarak, Egypt helped make the Gaza Strip a prison camp, by closing the Southern border, but that was due to pressure from his ally the US. After Mubarak resigned on May 28, 2011, Egypt permanently opened its border with the Gaza Strip.
I realise that Israel needs to protect it's border with Gaza, but how does restricting exports FROM Gaza help to achieve this? How does reducing Gazan fishing to a tiny strip of sea 3 nautical miles wide achieve this?
'Blame the Palestinians' you say. Is it their fault that their homeland was invaded?

Posted by: R Jordan | Mar 19, 2013 11:36:37 AM

R Jordan,

I agree that it would be helpful if Gaza (and the West Bank) would finally have a stable, independent (secular? liberal? democratic? these days it looks doubtful) government and that Israel could do a lot more to facilitate things.

But let's not forget that Gaza was under complete Egyptian occupation from 1948 to 1967 (and the West Bank under complete Jordan occupation). Why wasn't there any urge to establish a Palestinian state over these two decades? It was only when Israel occupied these territories (along with the Sinai, later returned to Egypt when a peace treaty was signed) after 1967 that the issue became popular. As for Gaza, Israel evacuated all its citizens from the territory in 2005 and left intact a host of structures including an elaborate system of greenhouses that could have been the basis for a thriving agricultural economy. Instead these were promptly looted and destroyed.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/9331863/#.UUiMVlf4KSo

Two years later Hamas seized power and threw members of Fatah off building roofs and thousands of rockets have rained down on towns in southern Israel ever since.

As for Gazan exports, these can be done via Egypt or via Israel. Gazan farmers prefer the Israel route because profits are higher and ( ! ) there are fewer restrictions (on the Egyptian side residents of Sinai feel that Gazan produce is undercutting their own agriculture and the Egyptian customs agents are far more stringent). As long as security rules are met, Gazan produce can be exported to the Israeli market or via Israel to Europe. Paradoxically, the efforts in Europe to boycott Israeli goods end up harming Palestinian farmers (including those of the West bank).

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4329972,00.html

And, btw, the fishing area off Gaza currently extends to 9.6 nautical miles. (Before Hamas took over Gaza, the area, as set by the Oslo agreement, was 20 nautical miles.)

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/11/2012112592819190218.html

Posted by: Rolf | Mar 19, 2013 12:30:44 PM

Angling Saxon:
Your pushing a false analogy. The experience of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza is not analogous to what happened to Japanese-Americans and Japanese-Canadians during the Second World War.

The point of the analogy was to explore the question "is it OK to subject all members of a group to discriminatory harsh treatment if there is a slightly higher (tiny) risk that a member of this group will commit a certain crime", not to say that long-term internment camps are identical in badness to being detained for a few hours in an airport. That's how analogies work, they aren't meant to claim that two situations are similar in every respect, just in some key respect that is the point of the analogy.

But if you'd prefer an analogy where the "level of badness" of the discriminatory treatment is more similar, how about racial profiling by police, in which police may have a policy of being more likely to stop and search people of certain races (blacks and to a lesser extent hispanics, mostly, at least in the U.S.) for no reason other than their race? Hopefully you'd agree the level of humiliation, inconvenience etc. of being randomly stopped and frisked by a cop is no worse than that of being detained for a while by airport security. So is this sort of discriminatory treatment by police cool with you if crime statistics show that members of those races do have a slightly higher chance of, say, carrying unlicensed guns or drugs, even if the vast majority of members of that race are not guilty of such things?

Posted by: Jesse M. | Mar 19, 2013 3:40:39 PM

If the terror acts against Israel (and against all the Western World!) are committed by Arabs, the Arabs will be first controlled in an Israeli airport...as in Spain the Basques, as in England the Irishmen, as in Russia the Chechens...The acts of terrors are not committed by old Jewish ladies...The security forces have a limited time and energy and it will work by profiles and by information received and it will be stupid to do otherwise. Israel is in war with the Arab Islamic Terror and Muslims will be the first on the list of usual suspects and not the Jehovah's Witnesses or Buddhists...

Posted by: mirel | Mar 19, 2013 6:28:51 PM

mirel wrote:
If the terror acts against Israel (and against all the Western World!) are committed by Arabs, the Arabs will be first controlled in an Israeli airport

So, do you believe racial profiling--cops stopping and searching people purely on the basis of race--should be the law of the land in the U.S., as long as there is any statistical difference in violent crime rates by different races? If not, what's the difference? If you looked at the statistics, I'm pretty confident you'd find the number of people killed by terrorists per year has always been much smaller than the number killed in "normal" violent crimes like robberies.

Posted by: Jesse M. | Mar 19, 2013 6:44:26 PM

I'm not an american citizen and I'm not a law enforcer specialist to advise the American police. The difference Israel-USA is that USA is fighting her wars faraway of American soil and Israel, a tinny country, is fighting near or in the house. When the controller is checking the stranger on the border, he knows that between his control at airport and his home where his parents and brothers and sisters are living are only a couple of minutes and no one else to stop the killer. Israel is fighting a nearly hundred years of war and war is not "cool" or "right" or "fair" but is something dreadful and horrid that you have to win at any price or to die...

Posted by: mirel | Mar 19, 2013 6:58:41 PM

mirel wrote:
I'm not an american citizen and I'm not a law enforcer specialist to advise the American police.

If you have any well-thought-out standards for what is moral and what is not, you should be able to apply these standards to any country (morality does not have a nationality). Anyway, the question could easily be transferred to Israel--the Jews of Israel consist of many different ethnic groups, if one non-Arab ethnic group of Israeli Jews was found to have a higher rate of violent crime than others, would you find it morally acceptable for police to have an order to randomly stop and search members of this ethnic group on the street or while driving in cars, but not do the same for other ethnic groups?

The difference Israel-USA is that USA is fighting her wars faraway of American soil and Israel, a tinny country, is fighting near or in the house. When the controller is checking the stranger on the border, he knows that between his control at airport and his home where his parents and brothers and sisters are living are only a couple of minutes and no one else to stop the killer. Israel is fighting a nearly hundred years of war and war is not "cool" or "right" or "fair" but is something dreadful and horrid that you have to win at any price or to die...

When it comes to terrorism, calling it "war" is just a label, a word for violence carried out for certain kinds of political reasons as opposed to "ordinary" criminal ones. (but perhaps you are a person who cares more about words being sufficiently lofty-sounding than you do about actual practical realities, since you make it a point to mock my use of the slangy word "cool") As I pointed out before, in terms of actual deaths and damage caused, terrorism is not akin to conventional "war" in terms of having effects many times larger than those due to crimes and accidents. Periodic terrorist killings won't cause Israel as a nation to "die", nor are deaths caused by terrorists somehow inherently more sad and tragic than deaths caused by robberies (or car accidents), of which there are presumably a lot more per year than deaths by terrorists. I see no reason to treat them as fundamentally different in the sense of declaring that the moral considerations we apply to crime-stopping don't apply to terrorism-stopping (when you say war is not "fair" or "right" does that mean you think we can no longer talk about moral standards of any kind when a country has declared itself to be "at war"?)

Certainly I'm not arguing for being lax in security procedures, but is there any evidence that the security that Israeli Jews have to go through at airports wouldn't be sufficient to catch any terrorists trying to sneak bombs aboard? And even if it's not, why not just beef up the security a little for everyone, rather than having a racist double standard that humiliates and dehumanizes a huge number of innocent people?

Posted by: Jesse M. | Mar 19, 2013 7:44:14 PM

In answer to Rolf...

The mere fact of the migration of Ethiopian Jews to Israel, is not "proof" of any sort with respect to a purported lack of racism within Jewish society in Israel. Ironically enough, the so-called "Law of Return" doesn't apply to the indigenous Palestinian inhabitants of Israel, despite UN Resolution 194 calling for the return of Palestinian refugees - but it does apply to all Jews, including Ethiopian Jews. Having a right of return though does not necessarily extend to a right of acceptance.

It's not only Ethiopians in particular who have been targeted, the highly discriminatory treatment of Sephardi Jews by those of mostly European Ashkenazi background is well known. Writing in Peter Beinart's "Open Zion" on the Daily Beast, Emily Hauser had this to say about the treatment of the Sephardis:

"When Sephardi Jews began to pour into the newly established country from all across the Middle East and North Africa, they were called primitivim, and they and their children were treated as such for decades. Many Yemenite families still believe their children were kidnapped and adopted; official inquiries have found that while that didn’t happen (with 56 possible exceptions), possibly hundreds of children died and were buried without their parents being informed. Newly arrived Sephardi children were routinely treated poorly by the Ashkenazi schools to which they were sent, marriages were forbidden by angry Ashkenazi parents, and home-seeking Sephardi families were shunted to disadvantaged development towns. The establishment and meteoric rise of Shas in Israeli politics came largely in response to this reality."

The treatment of Ethiopian Jews has been unquestionably racist, even down to the marginalizing of their community and the open questioning of their claim to be Jewish. In 1996 Israeli hospitals threw out all blood donated by Ethiopians. The response from a spokesperson for the Israel Association for Ethiopian Jews was "What do they think? That we're not humans."

In the previous comment I brought up racism within Israeli Jewish society, to highlight the racism toward Muslim Palestinians. I mean you don't have to be on the left to get what lies at the root of Israeli's claim to be a Jewish state. Even Condoleezza Rice - no raving liberal - said in her memoir No Higher Honor that she was shocked by Tzipi Livni's 'ethnic purity' claim when she [Rice] asked about UN Resolution 194 - the right of return for Palestinian refugees. Livni said that Israel couldn't comply with 194 because it would threaten the "Jewishness" of the country. Rice, who grew in the American south, unsurprisingly was taken aback by what is really a racist statement because in the context of Israeli society "Jewishness" isn't just a statement about religion but also a genetic or ethnic marker - that which makes for alleged distinctiveness as a people - a notion the Israeli writer and academic, Shlomo Sand, takes major issue with in his book "The Invention of the Jewish People."

Posted by: j_93 | Mar 19, 2013 11:09:31 PM

It seems more likely a case of ethnocentrism rather than racism. Regardless, the criticism of Israel from the Arab world and the West is hypocritical.

Firstly, based purely on race, Israel is one of the most diverse countries on the planet. That the fledgling state of Israel had problems successfully incorporating the multi-racial "Sephardi Jews [that] began to pour into the newly established country from all across the Middle East and North Africa" is unsurprising. Almost one million Jews across the Arab world felt either compelled or were forced to flee Arab countries immediately following the declaration of Israel, almost all without their possessions. Surely, this would problematize any measure of racism based on these newly arrived groups also possessing a clearly lower socio-economic standing.

Secondly, discounting the Lebanese Christians, none of its Arab neighbors have anything remotely approaching Israel's 15% minority Muslim population. Saudi Arabia could only dream of, or perhaps dread, those sort of demographics. Most of the Middle East and North Africa have non-Muslim religious demographics of less than 2%. Even the celebratory, liberal multicultural meccas of Europe and the US have yet to realize the religious diversity that Israel possesses.

Posted by: Troy | Mar 20, 2013 9:36:36 AM

@ Jesse said:"if one non-Arab ethnic group of Israeli Jews was found to have a higher rate of violent crime than others, would you find it morally acceptable for police to have an order to randomly stop and search members of this ethnic group on the street or while driving in cars, but not do the same for other ethnic groups?"
The answer: Yes,why not? But this is personal opinion. If an ethnic group has "a higher rate of violent crime than others" I believe that is normal to act like this. The shame is not with the society and neither with the police, but with this ethnic group, with the leaders of this ethnic group, with a problem of education. This ethnic group will be suspected and searched more, but also will receive more aid, education and culture efforts (more hours in school, more teachers, more soldiers in the "national civil service" will coach the young).
But not only crime.The Jews from Ethiopia,saved from persecutions and certain death, are coming from a Third World society(they had never used electricity, elevators or televisions before)and they are receiving free education in Universities and homes (with very low rent)and help that no other immigrant group is receiving.In the same time they are checked for TB, hepatis B and Aids (that this ethnic group is sick at a rate of 2,3%)and their blood donations are suspected and re-checked now, after a period that were even destroyed.
In the '50's, the newcomers from Eastern Europe, mostly Romania, were checked for syphilis (them and only them).
Jesse said:"Periodic terrorist killings won't cause Israel as a nation to "die".
However a terrorist state or an organization of terrorist may destroy and even annihilate a state: acouple of months ago the MAJORITY of the Israeli citizens were under the Hamas rocket fire, a modern atomic bomb from Iran may annihilate half of the Israeli population(because of the small size of the country), a bacteriological weapon may be even more lethal. So the terror is war, a new kind of war that has to played global, with no frontiers and with less restraint. However is very difficult to explain our feelings when we are hearing on radio that it was committed a new terror act, a bomb in a bus or in a mall and how we breath and feel until we know and contact our loved ones, our sons to know that they are safe...May you never know this feeling and may you never understand us...

Posted by: mirel | Mar 20, 2013 2:12:25 PM

Under the November 2012 ceasefire between the Israeli and Palestinian authorities, the fishing limit was supposedly extended to six nautical miles. Fishermen began to sail further out to sea, resulting in somewhat greater yields of fish. However, attacks against fishermen continued, even within the previous three mile limit. Between 22 November 2012 and 28 February 2013, there have been 41 shooting incidents, resulting in 4 injuries. In addition, 42 fishermen have been detained in 11 arrest incidents. Furthermore, 8 boats have been damaged, and 8 boats have been confiscated.

In an online statement on 25 February 2013 the Israeli Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) declared that fishermen could now access the sea up to six nautical miles offshore, and that farmers could now access lands in the border area up to 100m from the border fence. However, both references have since been removed from the statement.

Posted by: Elia | Mar 21, 2013 2:41:19 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

musafir on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Norman Costa on Race Is Not Biology

Geoff on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Kai Matthews on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

fallensparks on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

jon s on Race Is Not Biology

musafir on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

musafir on Faith Healing

Dave Ranning on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Geoff on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Luke Lea on Race Is Not Biology

fallensparks on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Luke Lea on Race Is Not Biology

jo smith on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

jo smith on Guy de Maupassant

Geoff on Jeremy Scahill & Noam Chomsky on Secret U.S. Dirty Wars From Yemen to Pakistan to Laos

Jim on Friday Poem

JF on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Jesse on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Kenan Malik on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Pierre on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

chris on Race Is Not Biology

Dave Ranning on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Sumiran on Friday Poem

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed