February 22, 2013
Waging War On Sex Workers
Zoe Schlanger interviews journalist and former sex worker Melissa Gira Grant "on what feminists get wrong about prostitution," in Guernica:
Grant joined me at her neighborhood coffee shop on a February afternoon, and as we sat down, she pointed to a cafe table behind us. “I outlined my book over there,” Grant said, and pointed to another. “And that’s where we discussed the proposal.” This summer, Grant’s first book,Playing the Whore, will be published by Verso Books in collaboration with Jacobin magazine, where she is a contributing editor.
She recently published a piece at Jacobin titled “Happy Hookers,” a critique of how those who have not worked in the sex industry tend to think about those who have, and how those feelings, whether grounded in the reality of the industry or not, shape policy that affects workers–almost always in a way that harms.
In a recent piece in Reason magazine, Grant asks, “How have we arrived at this point, that in the name of ‘protecting’ women, or even ensuring their ‘rights,’ feminists are eager to take away their jobs and health care?” She points her finger at what Elizabeth Bernstein calls “carceral feminism,” wherein success is measured in arrest numbers, and conservative donors are mollified by the portrayal of all sex workers as victims. “The result is—or should be—an international scandal,” Grant writes.
Grant and I talked over tea about sex worker organizing, transmisogyny, and what it means to be real on the Internet.
—Zoe Schlanger for Guernica...
Melissa Gira Grant: ...I’ve moved away from writing about and describing actual experiences of sex work, whether mine or anybody else’s, because the culture is obsessed with the behavior of sex workers. They want to figure out why they do what they do and who they are. Women’s sites like xo Jane, Crushable, and even Jezebel have been publishing a lot of first-person writing by sex workers. I’ve noticed an uptick in the last year. A lot of it is really great and breaks stereotypes, and that’s in addition to the blogs that sex workers themselves have.
What I’m trying to do is to shift the focus onto the producers of the anti-sex work discourse: the cops, the feminists, the anti-prostitution people. They don’t like being talked about. So my response was, “Look, this wasn’t a piece about how you or I feel about sex work. It’s about the actions of groups of people, and so if you can show me something different about the impact of these actions, I’d like to see it.” Those are the people whose behavior needs to change.
Posted by Robin Varghese at 08:47 AM | Permalink






















Comments
As if she were an "expert" on the "sex worker" "industry." And how representative are "sex workers" who write about their experiences in magazines? Or on the internet?
A study in presumption.
Posted by: Luke Lea | Feb 22, 2013 10:39:24 AM
I will observe that women seem genetically pre-disposed to trade sex for resources, especially in times of duress. See here:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.csom.umn.edu%2Fassets%2F71503.pdf
That said, when force and deception enter the equation, that is a different thing altogether.
Posted by: Luke Lea | Feb 22, 2013 10:46:02 AM
@luke
I see a pattern here. You comment on what you don't read. It's an interview and a good one with someone who has a unique perspective and can express herself.
Posted by: Gene | Feb 22, 2013 12:05:58 PM
Like any worldwide industry, sex work is very fragmented and extremely diverse - anyone who claims to speak for all others is a fraud.
Posted by: Jean-Marc | Feb 22, 2013 3:40:56 PM
The sex trade in places like Mexico is exremely destructive to the workers. 'Sex-slaves' would be a better word. How about an interview with them?
Posted by: E N | Feb 22, 2013 11:10:43 PM
If you are interested in the sex trade in New Mexico, I have some recommendations:
Gloria Anzaldúa: Borderlands. La Frontera. The New Mestiza.
Amy Sara Carroll: “Accidental Allegories” Meet “The Performative Documentary”: Boystown, Senorita Extravida and the Border-Brothel-Maquiladora Paradigma
(That's of course, assuming that you are actually interested in the sex trade in Mexico and not just derailing a thread about the experience of a sex worker in a different social context. Some sex workers are sex slaves, and some are not and all these different perspectives are important to listen to.)
Posted by: Adele Quested | Feb 23, 2013 7:56:04 AM
Grant makes a very good case for not being assumptive when we think about the subject, and for remembering that sex workers are a varied lot. Their varying as individuals does not, however, make them tougher against risk, only resistant to stereotyping.
If most men and some women who have a place in their lives for sex workers -- the place of no-strings sex for which they pay -- were not interested in precisely the existing power dynamic (having sex with someone more vulnerable than they are, that is), then why wouldn't they just sleep around? Casual sex away from the mainstream of life is a big part of how many people live, married or not.
The idea of sex workers ascending to legitimacy and unionizing for benefits would be great -- except the illicit nature of the trade, and its non-existant protections for workers in it, make up an enormous part of its appeal to customers.
As for sex workers having a place on neighborhood councils, I somehow don't think that will wash. Ahem! Don't their customers have all those places?
Readers of this article should also take the time to click through the eight photos of herself that Grant has provided, of which five are quite objectifying and at odds with her written message.
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Feb 23, 2013 10:35:51 AM
Grant makes a very good case for not being assumptive when we think about the subject, and for remembering that sex workers are a varied lot. Their varying as individuals does not, however, make them tougher against risk, only resistant to stereotyping.
If most men and some women who have a place in their lives for sex workers -- the place of no-strings sex for which they pay -- were not interested in precisely the existing power dynamic (having sex with someone more vulnerable than they are, that is), then why wouldn't they just sleep around? Casual sex away from the mainstream of life is a big part of how many people live, married or not.
The idea of sex workers ascending to legitimacy and unionizing for benefits would be great -- except the illicit nature of the trade, and its non-existant protections for workers in it, make up an enormous part of its appeal to customers.
As for sex workers having a place on neighborhood councils, I somehow don't think that will wash. Ahem! Don't their customers have all those places?
Readers of this article should also take the time to click through the eight photos of herself that Grant has provided, of which five are quite objectifying and at odds with her written message.
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Feb 23, 2013 10:37:36 AM
@luke
I see a pattern here. You comment on what you don't read.
I skimmed, true, formed a general impression, then made my comment. There may be good things in her essay, I wouldn't deny that, but my general criticism still stands. She was trying to characterize an "industry" of "sex workers" with which I will not put. She herself may be a sex worker and there are certainly others like her, countably many, but there are many, many more who do not fall under her rubric and those are the ones I am concerned about. White slaving, violent pimps of teenage girls, sex slaves in China, sex slaves in America, etc.
Posted by: Luke Lea | Feb 23, 2013 12:06:52 PM
Did I mention sex slaves in Israel. It is a real problem there and a blot against the Jewish state. As a long-time, steadfast supporter of Israel that galls me. It also undermines Western support for the state of Israel. Any true Zionist should be up in arms over this situation. And Orthodox Jewish groups in Israel who support it should be condemned, shamed, and above all exposed. God, I hate saying these things, but I hate the things themselves even more.
Posted by: Luke Lea | Feb 23, 2013 12:12:55 PM
"If most men and some women who have a place in their lives for sex workers -- the place of no-strings sex for which they pay -- were not interested in precisely the existing power dynamic (having sex with someone more vulnerable than they are, that is), then why wouldn't they just sleep around?"
I also to suspect that the power dynamic is a big part of the appeal for many, many (maybe the majority) of clients and I'm often the one to bring that up when people are getting sentimental about those poor, desperately lonely johns, who sometimes want to just talk, hungering for the human touch, pining for that hooker with the heart of gold. Relationships can be rather exploitative and sentimentalized at the same time.
Still, we probably shouldn't be utterly dismissive of the idea that some people just don't meet that certain magical treshold of minimum conventional attractiveness/minimum social skills to make this "casual sex"-thing happen for them. And obviously they have needs too. Doesn't mean that they are entitled to get these needs fulfilled, but if someone is willing to meet these demands and they in turn are willing to offer a fair deal....
Or take for instance sex surrogates for people with disabilites. That's a different kettle of fish for many reasons, but still, a form of sex work that is needed, I think.
Posted by: Adele Quested | Feb 23, 2013 3:21:30 PM
"Any true Zionist should be up in arms over this situation."
Luke Lea's comment opens up a digression, but one worth addressing because Israel has ranked high among countries known for trafficking of sex workers... although in Israel's case "slaves" mightn't be overstating it. It's hard not to smile though at the thought that Zionists need to step up and do the right thing in this case.
The indignation expressed about the exploitation of these women in Israel is well taken but why not equally indignant and ashamed about the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians during the period of the Nakba and the continuing despicable occupation of a people who should have first right-of-return? There is of course the matter of UN Resolution 194 granting Palestinian refugees right of return. Non-compliance by Israel is for purely racist reasons... Palestinians aren't Jewish.
It seems to me that there are many toxic and outright racist practices that are endorsed by Zionists... for example the despicable treatment of African asylum seekers who have been treated like pariahs, their residences in Tel Aviv even firebombed, with orchestrated campaigns backed by rabbis, politicians and landlords to make it difficult them to get get lodgings, work etc. Or what about the use of the long-lasting contraceptive Depo Provera on Jewish women of Ethiopian origin. A few pundits have argued that it amounts to undercover eugenics in an effort to maintain the Ashkenazi "face" of Israel.
So why so shocked about a sex trade that is equally racist. That East European women have and are being trafficked and held in Israel as virtual sex slaves to act as surrogates, doesn't seem out of character. The co-director of the Israeli Awareness Center in Tel Aviv, Leah Gruenpeter-Gold, has said that these women are being 'sacrificed' to the sexual needs of a culture that protects the virtue of the Jewish female.
Israel shows extraordinary tolerance for reactionary right-wing bigotry, racism and xenophobia in many, many forms so really... being appalled by the treatment of foreign women seems a little disingenuous.
Posted by: j_93 | Feb 23, 2013 3:47:52 PM
"illicit nature of the trade, and its non-existant protections for workers in it, make up an enormous part of its appeal to customers."
Do you have anything to support this statement? I don't buy the "they could just have casual sex" line of reasoning. Not everyone has the social skills or physique to easily navigate such circles.
Posted by: tomas | Feb 23, 2013 6:38:49 PM
Tomas, I cannot cite chapter and verse, but I have read in many places over decades that the clients of sex workers find the set-up precisely as is arousing. Danger, illegality, feelings of superiority and greater power, as well as the disposability of the sex worker, are sexy to lots of people. And there's more -- the client need not bear any responsibility for whether the sex worker enjoys the encounter.
You're right, however -- casual sex that you don't pay for is not available to everyone. My remarks should have been more specific. Even so, many clients of sex workers are pretty normal -- not shy, not disabled, not so unattractive they could not find a partner otherwise. What I was getting at was that sex with sex workers was appealing to people who had many other options, some of which they also exercised.
This is my major issue with the "improvements" in the trade that the writer would like to see -- that it should be licit, safe, unionized and "out." Those changes, which would make life so much better for workers, would scatter a large portion of the clientele for their services by totally altering the dynamic. Oh, that would be fine with me.
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Feb 23, 2013 8:03:05 PM
Among the ultra-religious in Israel, pedophilia seems to be very popular:
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/
Posted by: Louise Gordon | Feb 23, 2013 10:46:36 PM
Members of the "world's oldest profession" are going to be with us.
There is need to protect them from being forced into the profession, and to provide a safe environment for the sex workers and their clients. One gets the impression that the "pimps" are often abusive but the current system, without legal recognition in most countries, requires their services.
As to Israel's hypocrisy, duh!
Posted by: waqnis | Feb 24, 2013 11:09:41 AM
Post a comment