| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« GETTING ANIMALS IN VIEW | Main | Squash star takes on the Taliban »

February 26, 2013

Transcending Matter

Our own Morgan Meis in The Smart Set:

ID_IC_MEIS_ASHCA_AP_001Human history is written from the perspective of the winners. But it is also the case that the winners are, more often than not, assholes. Looking back over the wreckage of past ages, losers can come off looking pretty good in comparison. The story of what-could-have-been sometimes beats the story of what-actually-was.

One scenario for meditations upon history's winners and losers took place in New York City, 1913 when a group of painters decided to put on a show at the Armory building. The idea behind the show was simple. One of the organizers, John Quinn, expressed it in his opening address, "The members of this association have shown you that American artists — young American artists, that is — do not dread, and have no need to dread, the ideas or the culture of Europe."

America was ready to confront the big boys (and a couple of girls) of European art. American art would no longer be perceived as the mostly provincial, second-order stuff of a colonial backwater. The Armory exhibit would display American artists like Oscar Bluemner, Patrick H. Bruce, James Earle Fraser, and Henry Twachtman alongside Cezanne, Redon, Gauguin, Van Gogh, Matisse, Picasso, Kandinsky, and Duchamp. Likewise, art enthusiasts in the U.S. would get their first glimpse of Continental art movements: Neo-Impressionism, Futurism, Fauvism, Abstraction, and Cubism.

Viewers of the exhibit were also going to see the newest creations of those American artists who had come to be known as The Ashcan School. Painters like William Glackens, Robert Henri, George Luks, Everett Shinn, and a young Edward Hopper.

More here.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 11:12 AM | Permalink

Comments

Enjoyed the first two sentences of your piece. Along the lines of the phenomenon of losers coming off looking pretty good: I recall a documentary about George McGovern in which the luminous Gloria Steinem serenely reflected that many members of the administration that humiliatingly defeated McGovern had subsequently done jail time; whereas all the veterans of the McGovern campaign are now happy and proud to run into one another.

Posted by: Shelley | Feb 26, 2013 1:09:32 PM

George Orwell, in terms of foreign policy, equated "the notion of winning" with the notion of bullying.

George Carlin equated it with the notion of who owns who.

Posted by: Dredd | Feb 26, 2013 2:37:53 PM

This is good essay, quite penetrating with regards to the artistic and human significance of what is being done in these paintings. That said, I found the material about art history's winners-and-losers perfunctory and unconvincing. The Ashcan School was a major influence on American painting for long after 1913, whereas European modernism continued to seem (literally and figuratively) alien for many decades — gaining full acceptance probably only after the second world war. And while the movement may seem "minor" as a movement — they were basically traditionalists as you say — the artists themselves are acknowledged as important.

Posted by: Arthur Whitman | Feb 26, 2013 7:09:12 PM

I am so sorry but three sentences in I yelled "Hitler" at my computer screen and laughed really hard. (There is a somewhat famous Sam Kinison incident where he is listing all of the things the USSR does worse than the United States when all of a sudden someone in the crowd yells "Sputnick!" and he pauses and goes, "Uh, yeah")
Ill finish the essay now. Didn't mean to interrupt.

Posted by: DrunktankDan | Feb 27, 2013 11:41:04 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

omar on Race Is Not Biology

Raza Husain on Race Is Not Biology

Raza Husain on Race Is Not Biology

Josef Stern on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Colette on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Dana on A young Houston couple is planning to give away $4 billion—but only to projects that prove they are worth it. Can they redefine the world of philanthropy?

omar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Dredd on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

omar on Race Is Not Biology

prasad on Race Is Not Biology

JF on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Sundar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

omar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

musafir on Loneliness, isolation and desperate yearning

carlos on The Gut-Wrenching Science Behind the World’s Hottest Peppers

Dredd on A young Houston couple is planning to give away $4 billion—but only to projects that prove they are worth it. Can they redefine the world of philanthropy?

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

JonJ on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

JonJ on Race Is Not Biology

omar on Race Is Not Biology

omar on Race Is Not Biology

Dredd on Race Is Not Biology

Dredd on Race Is Not Biology

allsmiles on A Mother, a Son and a Wife

sverson on Race Is Not Biology

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed