February 01, 2013
Impunity in India
Shubh Mathur in Guernica:
On Saturday June 9, 2012, Major Avtar Singh, formerly of the Indian Army and living in Selma, California, shot his wife and three children. Before turning the gun on himself, he called the Sheriff’s office and told them that he had killed four people. The SWAT team that responded to the call found his youngest and oldest sons, ages three and seventeen, and his wife, dead of gunshot wounds to the head; the middle son, fifteen years old, was critically injured, but alive. He died a few days later, from wounds to the head.
The execution-style gunshots to the head were identical to those which killed Major Singh’s most famous victim, the Kashmiri human rights lawyer Jalil Andrabi. Andrabi was abducted, tortured and murdered in 1996 for exposing abuses carried out by the Indian Army in Kashmir. Major Avtar Singh was also wanted by Kashmir’s courts and Interpol for the murder of twenty-eight people in Kashmir in the course of his career as an officer in 35 Rashtriya Rifles, a counterinsurgency unit of the Indian Army. The story of his crimes and the manner in which he evaded justice for sixteen years is a grim chronicle of Indian crimes against humanity in Kashmir and of the silence of the international community which has abetted these. The impunity exploited by India and enabled by the international community clearly corrupted Singh’s conscience, to judge by the murder of his family and his subsequent suicide. Until it deals with the gross human rights violations in Kashmir and an impunity that harkens back to its colonial past, India’s proud claims as the world’s most populous democracy are fatally tainted.
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 01:37 PM | Permalink






















Comments
"Until it deals with the gross human rights violations in Kashmir and an impunity that harkens back to its colonial past, India’s proud claims as the world’s most populous democracy are fatally tainted..."
Surely you jest...
Posted by: sachin | Feb 1, 2013 2:52:54 PM
I'll edit quickly; not realizing that the article linked out to another site.
"Until it deals with the gross human rights violations in Kashmir and an impunity that harkens back to its colonial past, India’s proud claims as the world’s most populous democracy are fatally tainted..."
Surely he jests...
Posted by: sachin | Feb 1, 2013 2:54:40 PM
No need to edit, really. You jest, Sachin
Posted by: rmk28 | Feb 1, 2013 4:58:26 PM
I'm back again: I read the article again--really wanted to make sure that I hadn't gotten comment happy.
After thought, I come back again--to correct myself. In my haste, I misunderstood an important aspect of the article.
My comment should have stated:
"Surely she jests..."
Posted by: Sachin | Feb 1, 2013 11:33:39 PM
I don't understand the posited link between democracy, populous or otherwise, and an absence of extra-judicial killings.
The agent-principal hazard in Democracy militates for extra-judicial killing, the political intstrumentalization of disorder, and the cult of the 'strong man'.
In the case of Punjab and Kashmir from the mid-80's onwards, extra-judicial killings by the Police (in the Punjab) and sections of the Army (in Kashmir)occurred precisely because India was democratic. A Sikh President and a Sikh Union Home Minister- both properly elected- did nothing to protect Punjab, indeed, the reverse seems the case, so what is this talk of Democracy getting tainted? That river was polluted at its source.
Similarly, in Kashmir, why did Farooq Abdullah and Rajiv Gandhi suddenly join hands to permit the rigging of the '87 polls? Surely, the lesson from Punjab, Kashmir, Assam, Nagaland, but also from 'Naxal' areas- is that terrorism and insurgency are part of democracy's tool kit- this is politically instrumentalized disorder which gives longevity to intellectually bankrupt, deracinated, dynasts whose notions of 'reform' remain confined to a little 'Crony Capitalism' to benefit their own kind.
Posted by: windwheel | Feb 2, 2013 2:17:47 AM
Post a comment