January 24, 2013
Why Stimulus Has Failed
Raghuram Rajan in Project Syndicate:
Two fundamental beliefs have driven economic policy around the world in recent years. The first is that the world suffers from a shortage of aggregate demand relative to supply; the second is that monetary and fiscal stimulus will close the gap.
Is it possible that the diagnosis is right, but that the remedy is wrong? That would explain why we have made little headway so far in restoring growth to pre-crisis levels. And it would also indicate that we must rethink our remedies.
High levels of involuntary unemployment throughout the advanced economies suggest that demand lags behind potential supply. While unemployment is significantly higher in sectors that were booming before the crisis, such as construction in the United States, it is more widespread, underpinning the view that greater demand is necessary to restore full employment.
Policymakers initially resorted to government spending and low interest rates to boost demand. As government debt has ballooned and policy interest rates have hit rock bottom, central banks have focused on increasingly innovative policy to boost demand. Yet growth continues to be painfully slow. Why?
What if the problem is the assumption that all demand is created equal? We know that pre-crisis demand was boosted by massive amounts of borrowing. When borrowing becomes easier, it is not the well-to-do, whose spending is not constrained by their incomes, who increase their consumption; rather, the increase comes from poorer and younger families whose needs and dreams far outpace their incomes. Their needs can be different from those of the rich.
Posted by Robin Varghese at 08:29 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Interesting notion. Apparently, using his examples, since the middle class can't afford houses and cars any more, we should focus on producing jewelry for the wealthy.
That may create economic activity. But isn't the economy supposed to serve people, not the other way around? If we reorder the economy to produce more jewelry and fewer cars and homes, fewer people will have cars and homes regardless of how much jewelry is produced.
This is essentially an argument that we should reorder our economy for the benefit of the wealthy. In fact, it probably reveals that the real barrier to economic growth has been the increasing concentration of wealth.
Posted by: Ross Williams | Jan 24, 2013 8:58:01 AM
With its absence of meaningful data, and its failure to enumerate any specifics, you can file Prof. Rajan's thesis--that stimulus failed (let alone was attempted)-- under "B", for baloney.
Posted by: Stefan | Jan 24, 2013 10:02:25 AM
B school bs from a trenchant capitalist. We need to increase unemployment while cutting the security net? Pro austerity? The rich should put their stooges' writings behind pay walls so we can't see how inhuman they are.
Posted by: Jake | Jan 24, 2013 12:59:37 PM
Maybe I could get a job writing BS for the rich? Nah, I'd rather be poor.
Posted by: Ned | Jan 24, 2013 1:37:30 PM
Post a comment