| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« The Scariest Environmental Fact in the World | Main | Thursday Poem »

January 30, 2013

That Cuddly Kitty Is Deadlier Than You Think

Natalie Angier in the New York Times:

ScreenHunter_111 Jan. 30 16.10In a report that scaled up local surveys and pilot studies to national dimensions, scientists from the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute and the Fish and Wildlife Service estimated that domestic cats in the United States — both the pet Fluffies that spend part of the day outdoors and the unnamed strays and ferals that never leave it — kill a median of 2.4 billion birds and 12.3 billion mammals a year, most of them native mammals like shrews, chipmunks and voles rather than introduced pests like the Norway rat.

The estimated kill rates are two to four times higher than mortality figures previously bandied about, and position the domestic cat as one of the single greatest human-linked threats to wildlife in the nation. More birds and mammals die at the mouths of cats, the report said, than from automobile strikes, pesticides and poisons, collisions with skyscrapers and windmills and other so-called anthropogenic causes.

Peter Marra of the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute and an author of the report, said the mortality figures that emerge from the new model “are shockingly high.”

More here.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 10:12 AM | Permalink

Comments

"All concur that pet cats should not be allowed to prowl around the neighborhood at will, any more than should a pet dog, horse or potbellied pig, and that cat owners who insist their felines “deserve” a bit of freedom are being irresponsible and ultimately not very cat friendly."

I wonder what folks think about this. We've been chided by a neighbor for letting our cat roam outside. I realize there is a risk involved, but this cat is just itching to get out constantly (he was originally a stray). It feels wrong to keep him locked up indoors his whole life. But I do worry about his safety (more than I worry about the threat he poses to the birds and lizards he may kill).

Posted by: Eli | Jan 30, 2013 11:04:47 AM

I used to like cats before I realized they are really just kept killers.

Posted by: Ned | Jan 30, 2013 12:02:30 PM

No problem. Just isolate the genes that are responsible for this behaviour and start breeding them out. in 2-300 years we could have cats who don't want to kill.

After all, this is what humans have been doing to domestic animals for millenia. Whenever their nature drives them to do something that is inconvenient for us, we just breed it out of them, all the while telling ourselves that we "love" them.

Posted by: Joe | Jan 30, 2013 12:21:10 PM

Could we do the same for humans and create humans who don't want to kill? That would be worthwhile.

Posted by: Ned | Jan 30, 2013 12:27:14 PM

This reads like something from The Onion...

Posted by: Derek | Jan 30, 2013 7:46:01 PM

Forget the article, how great is this Venus of Urbino cat.

Posted by: Yasser Haider | Jan 30, 2013 8:00:46 PM

- How many billion animals do we think cats *should* be killing each year? Let's say we're taking into account the welfare of people, cats, those other animals, the ecological impact of prey animals being killed too much or little, etc. Related to that last, what would the equilibrium population of these other animals be if there were no cats? Would we see a sharp rise then collapse etc?

- I'm guessing pets impact the environment much more through the meat they eat and carbon than via frog and bird eating - we're talking extra SUV per family per pet. I'm guessing too that neither the environmental nor the animal welfare groups from the Times article will call for a mass cat-culling to cut down on the carbon footprints of first world pet owners.

Posted by: prasad | Jan 30, 2013 8:12:37 PM

Years ago, when I took a fly swatter to a scary-looking spider in the presence of my furry, loveable little killing machine, he looked on in wide-eyed disbelief and then shrank away from me. I thought it over and realized that I hadn't stalked, leaped, caught and eaten my prey: I merely killed it with one swift blow and discarded it. It was then that I realized how perverted my "human" impulse to kill must have looked to my cat. There is honor among hunters.

Posted by: Susan | Jan 30, 2013 8:37:41 PM

Cat-culling is why Europe in the Middle Ages was prone to Plague. As cats were massacred, safe grain storage and urban hygiene suffered. Don't like to see wolf carcases floating down the Seine in Paris? Fine -- stop killing female apothecaries as witches and slaughtering the cats who are their familiars.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jan 30, 2013 9:21:27 PM

My new cat Tiger stays inside and plays with his catnip mouse.

He can't go outside because we are in the city.

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Jan 30, 2013 9:47:39 PM

Our kittys ate gophers and rats. They are useful down on the farm.

Posted by: carlos | Jan 30, 2013 10:49:47 PM

Yeah cats are pretty cool.

Posted by: flowers rainbows | Jan 31, 2013 2:14:18 AM

Hi Yasser,

Thanks for appreciating Frederica's modeling skills! :-)

All best, Abbas

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Jan 31, 2013 2:58:01 AM

Our cats stay indoors 100% of the time, wouldn't know that a mouse is more than a toy, and save us thousands in vet bills because they bring home no diseases. And they're loyal as dogs without the "mistakes."

Posted by: mr.ed | Jan 31, 2013 6:17:09 AM

Our cat just really gets excited playing with voles. He loves to go out and find them in the grass, bring them in and play and play. If you are a vole, and you can make it here, you can make it anywhere.

Posted by: Jb | Jan 31, 2013 6:35:22 AM

Did anyone who has commented actually READ this article beyond the headlines? Did anyone look at the original "scientific" report the attention-grabbing headlines are based on?

First off, the science of the original report is questionable with potential error in the hundreds of percent. It is based on a highly flawed "model" that can be summed up as, "garbage in - gospel out."

Second off, the original report clearly states that most of the bird and mammal killing is caused by feral cats not by domestic house cats.

The potential policy implications are in regard to ferals not domestic cats.

I wish that journalists who write about science actually understood it - but that is hoping for too much I guess. The endless repetition of the original (and poorly analyzed) wire report is telling how much thought gets put into the authorship of "news" stories these days.

Posted by: Laura Kelley | Jan 31, 2013 7:07:52 AM

I 'discussed' this article with our extended family of cats (7 total among our children and ourselves) and came to the conclusion that cats are more intelligent and honest than humans.

So be it!

Posted by: Félix E. F. Larocca, MD | Jan 31, 2013 11:07:50 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Dr. X, Ph.D. on Race Is Not Biology

jo smith on Physicists Create Quantum Link Between Photons That Don't Exist at the Same Time

jo smith on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

Dr. Smith on Race Is Not Biology

Sundar on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Sundar on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Sundar on Why race as a biological construct matters

Sundar on Race Is Not Biology

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

khaled on Evolution shapes new rules for ant behavior

musafir on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

araldo on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

JM on Physicists Create Quantum Link Between Photons That Don't Exist at the Same Time

SteveRR on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

jo smith on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

Grace on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Elatia Harris on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Abbas Raza on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Jonathan on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Bill on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Louise Gordon on The need for critical science journalism

omar on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

Jonathan on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Bill on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

jo smith on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed