| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Spencer Watson at the 12th Annual Windless Kite Festival | Main | Genetic evidence suggests that, four millennia ago, a group of adventurous Indians landed in Australia »

January 27, 2013

Proton is smaller than we thought

Hamish Johnston in Physics World:

Prot1The radius of the proton is significantly smaller than previously thought, say physicists who have measured it to the best accuracy yet. The surprising result was obtained by studying "muonic" hydrogen in which the electron is replaced by a much heavier muon. The finding could mean that physicists need to rethink how they apply the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED) – or even that the theory itself needs a major overhaul.

A proton contains three charged quarks bound by the strong force and its radius is defined as the distance at which the charge density drops below a certain value. The radius has been measured in two main ways – by scattering electrons from hydrogen and by looking very closely at the difference between certain energy levels of the hydrogen atom called the Lamb shift. Until recently the best estimate of the proton radius was 0.877 femtometres with an uncertainty of 0.007 fm

This Lamb shift is a result of the interactions between the electron and the constituent quarks of the proton as described by QED. These interactions are slightly different for electrons occupying the 2S and 2P energy levels and the resulting energy shift depends in part on the radius of the proton.

However, in muonic hydrogen the Lamb shift is much more dependent on the proton radius because the much heavier muon spends more time very near to – and often within – the proton itself.

Now an international team led by Randolf Pohl at the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics in Garching, Germany has measured the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen for the first time and found the proton radius to be 0.8418 fm with uncertainty 0.0007 fm.

More here.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 04:46 PM | Permalink

Comments

A very cool and important result! It definitely shows the need to think harder about correlated systematic errors in experiments. We need to have multiple angles of attack on each quantity to reduce the chances of relying on data sets suffering from such correlations.

Posted by: X | Jan 27, 2013 5:16:37 PM

Amazing! What X said is totally spot on!

Thank god, er, science?, darwin?
Anyways, thank humanity that there are people smarter than me out there to figure out this kind of stuff. The implications make my brain hurt. If true (and it seems like it is) this shakes up a lot of the stuff I learned in college.

Posted by: DrunktankDan | Jan 27, 2013 9:41:23 PM


I follow such matters as an interested and educated layman, and I find Quantum Mechanics fascinating, always.

As a social scientist [I am a research psychologist,] this reminds me of the distinctions among various scientific fields. One of those distinctions is the size of the error terms that we encounter. The social sciences are sometimes dismissed because they are not 'exact sciences.' Well, there are no 'exact sciences.' This article is affirmation of that fact.

On a continuum of error terms from small to large, as an example, we have physics on one end, life sciences in the middle, and social sciences on the other end. Within the social sciences, psychology deals with errors terms that are small compared to economics.

I marvel at the human intelligence and ingenuity that engineer the apparatuses and techniques to measure - no, to estimate - the radius of the proton. I know enough about error measurement to understand that the improvement in estimation from 0.877 femtometers with 0.007 fm uncertainty to 0.8418 fm with 0.0007 fm uncertainty deserves an gigantic "WOW!"

Posted by: Norman Costa | Jan 28, 2013 8:59:41 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

LWR on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Rashid on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Yoann on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Dave Ranning on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

sadhana on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Carol Westbrook on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Ken Bryant on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Umer Vakil on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Kabir on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Nina on White Indians

Nina on White Indians

Dave Ranning on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

Mohammed Hassanali on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

musafir on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Maniza on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Ellen Perry on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

waqnis on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Norman Costa on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Hannah Carlton on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Joe on Digging Up Bones or, The Labyrinths beneath Our Feet

JonJ on The Beautiful German Language

cpfaff on Passionate About The Actor's Art: an interview with Michael Howard

Sumiran on Sunday Poem

Ethan on Getting Smarter

Pacificklaus on NORTH KOREA’S NERVE WAR

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed