January 23, 2013
George Orwell on Arthur Koestler's "Darkness at Noon"
From New Statesman:
"Darkness at Noon" (1940) dramatises the Moscow show trials and Stalin’s "Great Purge" of Old Bolsheviks. In his review for the New Statesman, Orwell praised Koestler’s “inner knowledge of totalitarian methods”: “The common people,” argues the Party operative Gletkin, “cannot grasp ‘deviation’ is a crime in itself; therefore crimes of the sort they can understand – murder, train-wrecking and so forth – must be invented.” Many see Rubashov’s confession as a direct influence upon Winston Smith’s.
Orwell used his review as an opportunity to chastise the left-wing press in Britain for their refusal to speak up; a powerful statement made two years after Kingsley Martin refused to publish his despatches from Spain, fearing they would appear critical of Stalin, and therefore socialism: “What was frightening about these trials was not that they happened – for obviously such things are necessary in a totalitarian society – but the eagerness of Western intellectuals to justify them.”
Mr Arthur Koestler should know something about prison, for he has spent a respectable proportion of the past four years there. First a long stretch in one of Franco’s fortresses, with the sound of firing squads ringing through the walls twenty or thirty times a day; then a year or so of internment in France; then escape to England, and a fresh internment in Pentonville – from which he has just been unconditionally released, however. In no case, needless to say, has he been accused of any particular crime. Nowadays, over increasing areas of the earth, one is imprisoned not for what one does but for what one is, or, more exactly, for what one is suspected of being. Still, Mr Koestler can congratulate himself on having hitherto fallen only into the hands of amateurs. If England imprisoned him, it at any rate let him out again, and did not force him beforehand to confess to poisoning sheep, committing sabotage on the railways or plotting to assassinate the King.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 07:07 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Fascinating piece of history.
The re-published review of "Darkness at Noon" by George Orwell took me back to the end of the British Empire in India. That was when I read it.
In those days, to many of us there was nothing evil about Communism. The book raised questions, made us take a second look.
Interesting that Kingsley Martin refused to publish Orwell’s “dispatches from Spain”. But The New Statesman, under Kingsley Martin, filled a much-needed void. His failure to admit what was taking place in Soviet Russia is not to be condoned but considered with a broader perspective. Do we know all about the dark days of Cold War and what America and its NATO Allies did in the name of battling Communism? Later, America went on to arm and assist dictators in Latin America to suppress their people. Thousands were killed or just "disappeared".
Even today, how much do we really know about the ongoing battle against Islamic terrorism?
Posted by: waqnis | Jan 24, 2013 1:34:02 PM
Post a comment