| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Proton is smaller than we thought | Main | Cambridge, Cabs and Copenhagen: My Route to Existential Risk »

January 27, 2013

Genetic evidence suggests that, four millennia ago, a group of adventurous Indians landed in Australia

From The Economist:

20130119_STM999_0The story of the ascent of man usually casts Australia as the forgotten continent. Both archaeology and the genes of aboriginal Australians suggest that a mere 15,000 years were required for humanity to spread from its initial toehold outside Africa, on the Arabian side of the straits of Bab el Mandeb, to the land of Oz. The first Australians thus arrived about 45,000 years ago. After that, it took until 1788, when Captain Arthur Phillip, RN, turned up in Sydney Cove with a cargo of ne’er-do-wells to found the colony of New South Wales, for gene flow between Australia and the rest of the world to be resumed.

This storyline was called into question a few years ago by the discovery, in some aboriginal Australian men, of Y chromosomes that looked as though they had come from India. But the details were unclear. Now a study by Irina Pugach of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, in Leipzig, and her colleagues, which has just been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has sorted the matter out. About 4,000 years before Captain Phillip and his merry men arrived to turn the aboriginals’ world upside down, it seems that a group of Indian adventurers chose to call the place home. Unlike their European successors, these earlier settlers were assimilated by the locals. And they brought with them both technological improvements and one of Australia’s most iconic animals.

More here.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 04:49 PM | Permalink

Comments

I love it when 'the story' gets more complicated like this. Makes it that much harder for racists to make 'scientific' arguments.

Posted by: DrunktankDan | Jan 30, 2013 8:18:17 PM

An aboriginal friend of mine once visited South India (where there are mainly Dravidians) and was astonished at how much the locals looked like her people back home. Even the language sounded very similar to her.

Posted by: Alise | Jan 31, 2013 12:56:34 AM

they only tested people from the north of Australia, its well known Aboriginal Australians in that region traded and intermixed with other cultures/peoples, seems like the same old low quality science Auatralia in known for ( huge amounts of wrong information over the generations, even Darwin got Aboriginal people wrong), find one piece of evidence and construct a whole theory, been done to many times to mention, whats happened to science, no one seems to take a holistic view, instead tailor their methodology to target the outcome they are seeking, thats not science in my opinion, archaeology in OZ is dictated by money, no one does research for knowledge, a sponsor (person/organisation/company) must go through the tender process, the one who quotes the least is hired (usually the most unethical), if they dont get the outcome a sponsor wants they will not get hired again, same for government, I have seen projects change heritage advisors (archaeologists) multiple times durig the one project until they found someone to do what the sponsor wants, its all based on development not the pursuits of knowledge

Posted by: SS | Feb 4, 2013 10:52:10 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

musafir on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on Gezi Park

Raza Husain on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on The Insanity Virus

billy on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

rafiq on The Insanity Virus

Ben Schwartz on Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods

JonJ on Moving books

musafir on My Father: A Veteran's Story – Part 2

omar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Norman Costa on My Father: A Veteran's Story

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

jo smith on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Dredd on Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations

Dredd on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

R. Michael on Moving books

Brad Wilson on Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations

prasad on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Elatia Harris on Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods

Brad Wilson on Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods

Ben Schwartz on Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods

X on Physics’s Pangolin

jo smith on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

Jesse M. on NAPOLEON CHAGNON: BLOOD IS THEIR ARGUMENT

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed