December 21, 2012
We Call This Progress
Arundhati Roy in Guernica:
I don’t know how far back in history to begin, so I’ll lay the milestone down in the recent past. I’ll start in the early 1990s, not long after capitalism won its war against Soviet Communism in the bleak mountains of Afghanistan. The Indian government, which was for many years one of the leaders of the nonaligned movement, suddenly became a completely aligned country and began to call itself the natural ally of the U.S. and Israel. It opened up its protected markets to global capital. Most people have been speaking about environmental battles, but in the real world it’s quite hard to separate environmental battles from everything else: the war on terror, for example; the depleted uranium; the missiles; the fact that it was the military-industrial complex that actually pulled the U.S. out of the Great Depression, and since then the economies of places like America, many countries in Europe, and certainly Israel, have had stakes in the manufacture of weapons. What good are weapons if they aren’t going to be used in wars? Weapons are absolutely essential; it’s not just for oil or natural resources, but for the military-industrial complex itself to keep going that we need weapons.
Today, as we speak, the U.S., and perhaps China and India, are involved in a battle for control of the resources of Africa. Thousands of U.S. troops, as well as death squads, are being sent into Africa. The “Yes We Can” president has expanded the war from Afghanistan into Pakistan. There are drone attacks killing children on a regular basis there.
In the 1990s, when the markets of India opened, when all of the laws that protected labor were dismantled, when natural resources were privatized, when that whole process was set into motion, the Indian government opened two locks: one was the lock of the markets; the other was the lock of an old fourteenth-century mosque, which was a disputed site between Hindus and Muslims. The Hindus believed that it was the birthplace of Ram, and the Muslims, of course, use it as a mosque. By opening that lock, India set into motion a kind of conflict between the majority community and the minority community, a way of constantly dividing people. Finding ways to divide people is the main practice of anybody that is in power.
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 10:00 AM | Permalink






















Comments
I havent read the whole thing (and probably never will) but somehow i do not remember the idyllic India that existed before the two locks were opened.
Am I the only one?
Posted by: omar | Dec 21, 2012 11:23:25 AM
"There are drone attacks killing children on a regular basis there."
Read that sentence again and then think about what happened last week in Newtown.
If you think the two aren't related then you are living in a fantasy world that bears no resemblance to the actual world.
Posted by: Josef Stern | Dec 21, 2012 1:05:40 PM
Joseph, can you explain how they are related in your view?
I am just curious. I understand that everything is related to everything else, but I had the impression you meant related in some unusually direct manner?
Posted by: omar | Dec 21, 2012 2:19:49 PM
Omar: You understand. Adam Lanza and his type are pure products of America in that their rage is not commensurate to the insults they believe have been inflicted on them by life. Watch Twentynine Palms. Bruno Dumont explains it way better than I can.
Posted by: Josef Stern | Dec 22, 2012 4:34:48 AM
Josef: I suppose its safe to say that Adam Lanza's rage was excessive, but the rest of your comment seems very dubious to me. You think the personal anger exhibited by this socially isolated young man with Asperger's Syndrome is somehow a national trait, and that this trait explains the use of drones?
Posted by: David Hammer | Dec 22, 2012 11:21:30 AM
David: Yes. I think the United States' absolute and complete lack of concern for the rest of the world's safety - including its own citizens - is indicative of an Autistic sensibility.
Posted by: Josef Stern | Dec 22, 2012 12:43:32 PM
@Omar, you asked exactly the right question. Here is Joan Robinson (a leading Marxist Economist, and incidentally Amartya Sen's thesis supervisor at Cambridge):
“...the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all.”
– Joan Robinson in Economic Philosophy 1962
Posted by: Sundar | Dec 22, 2012 3:30:17 PM
Post a comment