December 20, 2012
The sustainable meat of the future: Mealworms?
The year is 2051. Given the realities of climate change and regulations on carbon emissions, beef and pork–protiens with high carbon footprints–have become too expensive for all but the most special of occasions. Luckily, scientists have developed an environmentally-friendly meat solution. Sitting down for dinner, you grab your fork and look down at a delicious plate of….mealworms. That, anyway, is one possibility for sustainable meat examined by Dennis Oonincx and Imke de Boer, a pair of scientists from the University of Wageningen in the Netherlands, in a study published today in the online journal PLOS ONE. In their analysis, cultivating beetle larvae (also known as mealworms) for food allowed the production of much more sustainable protein, using less land and less energy per unit of protein than conventional meats, such as pork or beef. In a 2010 study, they found that five different insect species were also much more climate-friendly than conventional meats—a pound of mealworm protein, in particular, had a greenhouse gas footprint 1% as large as a pound of beef. “Since the population of our planet keeps growing, and the amount of land on this earth is limited, a more efficient, and more sustainable system of food production is needed,” Oonincx said in a statement. “Now, for the first time it has been shown that mealworms, and possibly other edible insects, can aid in achieving such a system.”
This prospect might seem absurd—and, for some, revolting—but the problem of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from meat production is quite serious. The UN estimates that livestock production accounts for roughly 18% of all emissions worldwide, caused by everything from the fuel burned to grow and truck animal feed to the methane emitted by ruminants such as cows as they digest grass. Of most concern, since world populations are increasing and growing more wealthy, is that the demand for animal protein is expected to grow by 70-80% by 2050.
More here.
Posted by Azra Raza at 06:04 AM | Permalink






















Comments
There's always tofu. Fakin Bacon, Phoney Baloney, Tofurkey...
Posted by: Larry | Dec 20, 2012 6:31:31 AM
I mean, seriously, what's so horrible about vegetables??
Posted by: Colin | Dec 20, 2012 9:21:02 AM
Don't start with them as an entree. Use the mealworms as a nutrient rich extender to make your more traditional proteins go further. We can have a dialogue with our representatives about whether any labeling is needed. This is about making food available that most people could otherwise not afford.
Posted by: Jb | Dec 20, 2012 6:33:20 PM
By 2050 we should be able to manufacture all our food intake and spare animal, plant and insect life. It can be in the form of pills, drinks, paste, jerkies and other junk food. Doesn't have to look like worms or worse steaks or baby goat parts that people of today love.
Space food: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_food
Posted by: Raza Husain | Dec 20, 2012 7:11:45 PM
. . .Or you could go out and shoot a pig (an ecological nuisance if there ever was one) and have meat for half a year.
If you live in CA, that is. If something isn't done though they may be in all 50 states soon enough. Just heard from another hunter that they are sighting them as far as Wyoming now.
Posted by: DrunktankDan | Dec 20, 2012 8:50:28 PM
I've been wanting to try these for a while now. There are rather fewer ethical objections to eating bugs for one thing. More practically relevant perhaps is the environmental footprint of normal meat. The article mentions how nearly a fifth of global greenhouse emissions come from livestock, but the way I like to put it is that livestock produce more emissions than *all* the world's transportation combined. All the "fashionable" discussion about thermostats and recycling and lightbulbs takes place in a context where the difference between eating meat regularly and rarely is larger than that between driving an suv and riding a bicycle.
Posted by: prasad | Dec 21, 2012 3:03:06 AM
Post a comment