| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Interview: Howard Goldblatt, translator of Mo Yan | Main | Thinking the Unthinkable »

December 15, 2012

NEWTOWN AND THE MADNESS OF GUNS

Adam Gopnik in The New Yorker:

ScreenHunter_86 Dec. 15 19.56After the mass gun murders at Virginia Tech, I wrote about the unfathomable image of cell phones ringing in the pockets of the dead kids, and of the parents trying desperately to reach them. And I said (as did many others), This will go on, if no one stops it, in this manner and to this degree in this country alone—alone among all the industrialized, wealthy, and so-called civilized countries in the world. There would be another, for certain.

Then there were—many more, in fact—and when the latest and worst one happened, in Aurora, I (and many others) said, this time in a tone of despair, that nothing had changed. And I (and many others) predicted that it would happen again, soon. And that once again, the same twisted voices would say, Oh, this had nothing to do with gun laws or the misuse of the Second Amendment or anything except some singular madman, of whom America for some reason seems to have a particularly dense sample.

And now it has happened again, bang, like clockwork, one might say: Twenty dead children—babies, really—in a kindergarten in a prosperous town in Connecticut. And a mother screaming. And twenty families told that their grade-schooler had died.

More here.  And here is a petition to the White House to sign if you are so inclined.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 01:58 PM | Permalink

Comments

I am sorry if I sound cynical or insensitive. Give it a few weeks and it will be back to business as usual in the US of A.

Posted by: Saleem | Dec 15, 2012 3:20:21 PM

Dude, please don't say that. Please!
Obama doesn't have to worry about re election. I hope he has the fucking balls to do something, even though the President is fairly limited in their ability to, well, just limited in what hey can do in general. It's a slow system by design. Ah fuck it, I am just arguing with myself. You are probably right. And that is definitely a horrible thought.

Posted by: DrunktankDan | Dec 15, 2012 4:01:47 PM

Only three members of congress have dared to address the issue as of this afternoon. That doesn't make the prospects for gun control sound very hopeful. Even when one of their own was almost killed in this kind of incident they did nothing regarding gun control.

Posted by: Larry | Dec 15, 2012 5:13:14 PM

"Guns don't kill people; people do."

Yeah right!

Congress is on the payroll of the NRA, which in turn is a shill for gun manufacturers. I don't know if this time things will change and people's frustrations and fears will be addressed by the brain-dead legislators. I am hoping that police chiefs, hospital ER personnel and mayors (the ones who pick up bodies and console the survivors) will descend on Capitol Hill and give the bastards a piece of their collective mind.

Posted by: Ruchira | Dec 15, 2012 11:51:52 PM

If guns don't kill people, and it's people that kill people, then maybe we should ban people.

Posted by: Josef Stern | Dec 16, 2012 12:07:35 AM

Right on Ruchira!

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Dec 16, 2012 12:23:15 AM

Well said Ruchira. Yet I fear that, somehow (and I REALLY don't understand how), the others will be sickeningly correct and a week or two's news will see this horror rinsed from the headlines and the disgust will lose its edge and life in the USA will plod inexorably forward, onward to the next great body count... Will it be a new record? Who knows.... But what is much more certain is that nothing will be done. That saddens me greatly.

Why are the intelligent in your homeland so effectively side-lined? Where is the groundswell of civic demand? Surely it is not outnumbered by gun-toting morons who put their pathetic macho desires above the lives of innocent children? Is it?

If so, that's one more major reason I fear for the US's future existence....

Posted by: MattInOz | Dec 16, 2012 1:16:34 AM

"one more major reason I fear for the US's future existence"

Take a deep breath.... exhale slowly.....

Lets not mix up this crime with your muddled political and social fantasies.

Posted by: Sundar | Dec 16, 2012 9:49:59 AM

Thank you Sundar.

Posted by: Mark | Dec 16, 2012 10:34:34 AM

Prof. Jim Jacobs (NYU). Can Gun Control Work?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAtOTm8oE9Q

Posted by: Sundar | Dec 16, 2012 10:54:21 AM

We have been taking "deep breaths and exhaling slowly" for many years, hoping that some serious debate would occur in the public square. But every time the issue of thoughtful gun control is swept under the rug. Now it is time to hyperventilate until elected officials take notice. There is more to this phenomenon than we are willing to admit.

I wrote this on Facebook and will copy it here. The time for self reflection and action is now.

After every murderous rampage we wonder why Americans have a special propensity for mass murders - guns, inadequate mental health care, materialism, worshiping at the altar of the 2nd Amendment / NRA etc. But there are mentally disturbed individuals all over the world although not so many guns in private hands anywhere else. I have wondered how much of our individual psyche is also shaped by our national mindset. The notion of American exceptionalism and a government policy of solving problems via military means must play a role in forming a misguided sense of individual exceptionalism and the resultant tendency to solve personal problems by blowing away the "enemy" - real or imagined. Can't explain it any other way.

Posted by: Ruchira | Dec 16, 2012 1:30:10 PM

Sundar, To vote you need to register, to drive you need a license and register your car, to get credit you need credit check, to get a job you need a background check. If you change address you have to re-register to vote or drive. For medicines you need prescription. You need to pass different driving test for different types of vehicles and intended use. These are not toy guns and they kill people, accidentally as well. So why is it offensive to you or anyone if gun owners must pass tests based on their gun types, demonstrate their need to have it, and register every year.

Secondly in the video link you gave the Professor says "it is not possible to keep guns out of the hands of criminals". This is just a tautology. If carrying (unauthorized) guns is not a crime then obviously it could be in the hands of anyone including criminals and if it is a crime, then obviously anyone having it would be a criminal. For every professor against gun control I am sure you can find ten in favor of gun control. Don't you think so or were you just shooting from the hip?

Posted by: Raza Husain | Dec 16, 2012 3:21:05 PM


@saleem

Much as I want to to say "you're wrong". In my heart I feel that you're right. We have gone through this in the past.

It is our corrupt system based on campaign financing -- one of the factors which make our elected representatives beholden to lobbies -- and the lack of moral strength to question the interpretation of 2nd Amendment.

@ruchira

We can hope. Hope for sanity to prevail; hope that those who oppose any restrictions on guns will pause to think.

Posted by: waqnis | Dec 16, 2012 10:48:43 PM

Mark: "thank you Sundar"

Yes, let me echo that, thank you Sundar. For showing what true ignorance and denialism are about.

What "political fantasies" do you speak of? How would you know what my "politics" are? If you think granting innocent children and mainstream civilians the right to live free from the fear of being gunned down during their average weekday is playing 'politics' well, I fear all the more for the future of your country, possessed as it is by this rabidly maniacal minority.

I'm sure the Glock beneath your pillow completes you though.

Posted by: MattInOz | Dec 17, 2012 11:08:37 PM

"possessed as it is by this rabidly maniacal minority"

It's not just about some Marxist fantasy of constraining the power of elites, the democratic consensus needs to change through education.

"Historically, Americans favour stronger gun laws than we have on the books. But in the last decade, public support for stronger gun laws has been declining. Today, support for stronger gun laws is about even with those who oppose changes."
Robert Spitzer

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/recent-support-for-stronger-gun-laws-in-us-on-decline/article6462265/

Or, maybe that can happen through changing perceptions via the media.

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/turnbull-targets-murdoch-over-guns-20121217-2bii3.html

Oh wait, Murdoch is a major part of the rabidly maniacal minority....

Posted by: Troy | Dec 18, 2012 7:24:30 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Stuart Mathieson on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Kai Matthews on The Moral Status of Rocks

Norman Costa on Dear Guardian: You’ve Been Played

Dave Ranning on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

musafir on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Norman Costa on Race Is Not Biology

Geoff on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Kai Matthews on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

fallensparks on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

jon s on Race Is Not Biology

musafir on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

musafir on Faith Healing

Dave Ranning on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Geoff on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Luke Lea on Race Is Not Biology

fallensparks on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Luke Lea on Race Is Not Biology

jo smith on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

jo smith on Guy de Maupassant

Geoff on Jeremy Scahill & Noam Chomsky on Secret U.S. Dirty Wars From Yemen to Pakistan to Laos

Jim on Friday Poem

JF on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Jesse on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Kenan Malik on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed