December 02, 2012
Contrary to Common Belief, Female Porn Stars have Great Self Esteem
Or so claims so new research: Robert Gonzalez in io9:
Pornographic actresses are probably having more sex than you. No surprise there. But a newly published study suggests there's a good chance many of them have better self esteem, to boot — not to mention more enjoyable sex lives, better body images, and more positive outlooks on life. As for the widely held belief that female porn actresses share a history of sexual abuse (commonly known as the Damaged Goods Hypothesis), the researchers found the actresses were no more "damaged" than their non-pornographic counterparts.
In a study recounted in the latest issue of the Journal of Sex Research, a team of investigators led by Shippensburg University psychologist James D. Griffith surveyed 177 porn actresses on "a variety of behavioral, social, and psychological dimensions," namely: demographic information (age, ethnicity, etc), sexual behaviors and attitudes, self-esteem, quality of life and drug use.
"Some descriptions of actresses in pornography have included attributes such as drug addiction, homelessness, poverty, desperation, being pimped out, and being victims of sexual abuse," write the researchers. "Some have made extreme assertions, such as claiming that all women in pornography were sexually abused as children."
But studies on women in porn are lacking. And without data, argue Griffith and his colleagues, "claims regarding the attributes of pornography actresses lack support."
Posted by Robin Varghese at 11:57 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Just like research started to show that "no rape isn't about control, it sometimes is just about sex", it just doesn't play into the prevailing "maternalistic" dialectic of feminist victimhood. "What, sex workers are actually rational, thinking individuals who control their own bodies, chose their own path and don't ascribe to my conservative views on sex? No way!"
Posted by: anon | Dec 2, 2012 1:51:55 PM
You might want to google 'sex-positive feminism' before you go off on too much of a rant.
And if rape were 'just about sex', would that somehow make it OK to stick your dick in someone without their consent? How about you try thinking, it might make a pleasant change?
Posted by: Dave | Dec 3, 2012 4:35:30 AM
I'd guess the belief that porn stars lack self-esteem is peddled to people who think well of self-esteem and poorly of porn stars (+-). This article seems to come from a (++) position. Me, I come from a (-+) perspective, so I think less well of porn stars now than I used to.
Posted by: prasad | Dec 3, 2012 9:39:52 AM
Sociopaths have enormous self-esteem. Many mass murderers think they are God. It doesn't make their life choices right.
Posted by: Georg | Dec 3, 2012 10:47:02 AM
Exploitation of sex workers is undeniable. That,however, does not prove that all sex workers
(male and female) are unhappy.Perhaps Americans ought to think about legalizing sex workers so that they can operate in safe, healthy conditions.
The politicization of matters sexual is hypocritical. What consenting adults do in private should not be subject of persecution and speeches by gas bags.
“How did sex come to be thought of as dirty in the first place? God must have been a Republican.”
---Will Durst
Posted by: waqnis | Dec 3, 2012 11:58:14 AM
Georg wrote:
Sociopaths have enormous self-esteem. Many mass murderers think they are God. It doesn't make their life choices right.
Sociopathy/psychopathy seems to be the one mental condition everyone feels free to demonize these days--I doubt you would be so casual about equating autism with mass murder, for example. Not all sociopaths/psychopaths are destructive and morally indifferent, see "confessions of a pro-social psychopath" at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I12H7khht7o , and the book "The Wisdom of Psychopaths" also makes an interesting case that a lot of walks of life that are usually seen as beneficial to society (like surgeons) may have a high proportion of people who fit the clinical profile of psychopaths, whether they were born that way or whether their life path actually shapes them that way to some degree (the author points out that long-term meditators seem to have a number of traits in common with psychopaths, like control of emotions and instinctive reactions like the startle response, a general increased sense of well-being regardless of circumstances, and an increased ability to "read" the emotions of others through things like micro-expressions).
Posted by: Jesse M. | Dec 3, 2012 5:25:01 PM
Georg wrote:
Sociopaths have enormous self-esteem. Many mass murderers think they are God. It doesn't make their life choices right.
Sociopathy/psychopathy seems to be the one mental condition everyone feels free to demonize these days--I doubt you would be so casual about equating autism with mass murder, for example. Not all sociopaths/psychopaths are destructive and morally indifferent, see "confessions of a pro-social psychopath" at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I12H7khht7o , and the book "The Wisdom of Psychopaths" also makes an interesting case that a lot of walks of life that are usually seen as beneficial to society (like surgeons) may have a high proportion of people who fit the clinical profile of psychopaths, whether they were born that way or whether their life path actually shapes them that way to some degree (the author points out that long-term meditators seem to have a number of traits in common with psychopaths, like control of emotions and instinctive reactions like the startle response, a general increased sense of well-being regardless of circumstances, and an increased ability to "read" the emotions of others through things like micro-expressions).
Posted by: Jesse M. | Dec 3, 2012 5:27:01 PM
@Jesse.
'Moral indifference' is part of the definition of a sociopath. But maybe not in your made up, personal form of English.
Posted by: Georg | Dec 5, 2012 6:05:59 AM
sociopath: "a personality disorder characterised by a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others"
-American Psychiatric Association Manual of Diagnosis.
If you don't like the way the term is used, better take it up with them.
Posted by: Georg | Dec 5, 2012 6:19:04 AM
Georg,
Hey, since you're so good at looking things up, you should probably also look up what a "bad analogy" is in an argumentative context.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/14/985157/-Good-analogy-bad-analogy
Posted by: Joe | Dec 5, 2012 8:08:32 AM
Post a comment