| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Images on Cigarette Packs Are Scarier to Smokers Than Text Warnings | Main | Mira Nair's film of Mohsin Hamid's novel: The Reluctant Fundamentalist »

November 15, 2012

Nine theories of the multiverse promise everything and more

From Aeon:

MultiversesOur understanding of the fundamental nature of reality is changing faster than ever before. Gigantic observatories such as the Hubble Space Telescope and the Very Large Telescope on the Paranal Mountain in Chile are probing the furthest reaches of the cosmos. Meanwhile, with their feet firmly on the ground, leviathan atom-smashers such as the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) under the Franco-Swiss border are busy untangling the riddles of the tiny quantum world. Myriad discoveries are flowing from these magnificent machines. You may have seen Hubble’s extraordinary pictures. You will probably have heard of the ‘exoplanets’, worlds orbiting alien suns, and you will almost certainly have heard about the Higgs Boson, the particle that imbues all others with mass, which the LHC found this year. But you probably won’t know that (if their findings are taken to their logical conclusion) these machines have also detected hints that Elvis lives, or that out there, among the flaming stars and planets, are unicorns, actual unicorns with horns on their noses. There’s even weirder stuff, too: devils and demons; gods and nymphs; places where Hitler won the Second World War, or where there was no war at all. Places where the most outlandish fantasies come true. A weirdiverse, if you will. Most bizarre of all, scientists are now seriously discussing the possibility that our universe is a fake, a thing of smoke and mirrors.

All this, and more, is the stuff of the multiverse, the great roller-coaster rewriting of reality that has overturned conventional cosmology in the last decade or two. The multiverse hypothesis is the idea that what we see in the night sky is just an infinitesimally tiny sliver of a much, much grander reality, hitherto invisible. The idea has become so mainstream that it is now quite hard to find a cosmologist who thinks there’s nothing in it. This isn’t the world of the mystics, the pointy-hat brigade who see the Age of Aquarius in every Hubble image. On the contrary, the multiverse is the creature of Astronomers Royal and tenured professors at Cambridge and Cornell.

PICTURE: String Theory suggests that our universe may be like a page in a book, stacked alongside tens of trillions of others. Those other realities would be right next to us now.

More here.

Posted by Azra Raza at 06:02 AM | Permalink

Comments

As I understand from the premises that other universes could have different physical laws, the multiverse could also imply that there are other universes whose physics overlap our own physics. Maybe information could pass between these universes? That would open the door to all kinds of premonitions, ghosties and monsters being visible to people in this universe - just as mystics of various kinds have claimed for centuries. Disconcerting.

Posted by: aguy109 | Nov 15, 2012 9:35:38 AM

If we can answer what is is, the rest is going to be easy.

Posted by: Raza Husain | Nov 15, 2012 10:40:18 AM

"... promise everything and more ..."

Waxing political they are, as Yoda would likely say.

Posted by: Dredd | Nov 15, 2012 12:18:14 PM

The problem with the multiverse theories, as with String Theory, is that no one has proposed a way to test these theories. A scientific theory that remains devoid of experimental tests is philosophy or fantasy, not science.

It could be argued that science starts with theory and then moves to tests. When Einstein theorized that gravity ends light there was not an immediate test. But the difficulty of testing Einstein's theories is trivial compared to testing multiverse and String Theory. I've never read that anyone has even a glimmer of an idea of how these theories might be tested.

Posted by: Ian Kaplan | Nov 15, 2012 1:12:01 PM

The scientists involved seem to be scarily non-chalant about the ethical implications.

Somewhere necessarily your doppleganger is an axe murderer.

The version of you in this particular universe just so happens not to be an axe murderer.

So if at least one of you is an axe murderer, and most likely billions of you are axe murderers, then why not become an axe murderer in this universe as well?

Or course you might want to choose something a little less gory and less likely to stain your clothing such as stock broker for Goldman-Sachs, lobbyist for GE, Chicago politician, etc.

Posted by: DAS | Nov 15, 2012 1:21:40 PM

So if at least one of you is an axe murderer, and most likely billions of you are axe murderers, then why not become an axe murderer in this universe as well?

Even with infinite sets there may still be a concept of different subsets (say, the subset where you exist and are an axe murderer vs. the subset where you exist and are not) having different "measures" in the mathematical sense, and indeed this is almost certainly necessary to make sense of how we can make probabilistic predictions in any multiverse theory (otherwise we would have no basis for making any predictions about the future, since for any possible outcome of a future experiment, there will be universes where that outcome actually happens). So your personality traits, beliefs, and choices may affect the relative measure of different types of universes, making axe murderer versions of you very improbable relative to more ethical versions. David Deutsch, a quantum physicist who is one of the most outspoken advocates of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, once put it this way: "By making good choices, doing the right thing, we thicken the stack of universes in which versions of us live reasonable lives. When you succeed, all the copies of you who made the same decision succeed too. What you do for the better increases the portion of the multiverse where good things happen."

Posted by: Jesse M. | Nov 16, 2012 12:38:01 AM

As a layperson, I presume that the First Cause of each of the universes in the multiverse is the same, otherwise you have to give a cause before their First Causes to explain why they are different. In other words the multiverse came into being from the same singularity or Big Bang.

For universes to be different from one another there would have to be at least one law of nature that is different otherwise from where the difference arose. If we say that all universes have the same laws of nature then they must necessarily be identical, otherwise the multiverse consists of a range of infinite number of identical universes to an infinite number of entirely different ones.

Posted by: Raza Husain | Nov 16, 2012 10:35:46 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

flowers rainbows on Lift up your voices: The century-long battle for women's freedom

mr.ed on wagner in new york?

mirel on Here’s how to change the world

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

X on Getting Smarter

Ross Williams on Getting Smarter

oroboe on Lennon's "Imagine" and McCartney/Wings' "Band on the Run" overlaid: One way of reuniting (some of) the Beatles

Richard H. Randall on Obama must Make Fighting Climate Change National Project, or Die the death of a thousand Scandals

seth edenbaum on The First New Atheist? Kierkegaard

waqnis on Mortify Our Wolves

nogodrod on KFC smugglers bring buckets of chicken through Gaza tunnels

waqnis on Here’s how to change the world

Fernando on Mortify Our Wolves

seth edenbaum on The case against empathy

Dredd on Mortify Our Wolves

Max on Here’s how to change the world

Rohana on Mortify Our Wolves

Raza Husain on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

araldo on Here’s how to change the world

Elatia Harris on Here’s how to change the world

Sundar on Here’s how to change the world

araldo on Here’s how to change the world

prasad on Here’s how to change the world

araldo on Thursday Poem

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed