October 29, 2012
The Damned Don’t Cry (But They Ought To)
by James McGirk
After four debates and with a tsunami of political advertising inundating the United States, it is clear that neither presidential candidate is willing to act decisively on what should be the most pressing issue of our day: student loan debt.
Democrats offer crumbs. Republicans even can’t be bothered to pander to young voters. Yet no other issue so neatly encapsulates the miseries of contemporary American existence. An entire generation of smart, educated people are being crippled with debt. Without some sort of relief, upward mobility will vanish, the gap between rich and poor will yawn wider, our economy will be left in ruins, and what’s left of our once vaunted ability to innovate will die. The parasite is killing the host.
The time has come for decisive action. Student loan debt must be forgiven completely. The federal government should not be lending money to students. All it does is drive up prices and push us deeper in debt. Offer amnesty, get rid of the program, and let colleges pare down tuition until it makes sense for a family to save up or borrow money privately for their children to go. At the very least, let these loans be dischargeable in bankruptcy. This may seem like a drastic thing to do, but the situation is out of control. Something has to be done.
Student loan debt now accounts for 18 percent of American consumer debt. Unlike a mortgage there is no way to discharge a student loan (short of total medical disability). The interest is painful: 3.4 percent for a loan taken out as an undergraduate, and a usurious 6.8 percent for a graduate student. The interest capitalizes. Not only is it charged on the principal, but on any unpaid interest as well, meaning that a loan balloons while student is in school, or during the increasingly frequent forbearances necessary during periods of unemployment. There is no risk of default to the lender. The government guarantees all student loans. Nor is there any risk to universities. It is a trough of free money and these swine have gorged themselves, shamelessly raising tuition year after year, at a rate far outpacing inflation.
The class of 2011 graduated with $26,600 worth of debt each. That’s just for a bachelor’s degree. And those numbers include the lucky third that graduated with no debt at all. For a shot at a job that might offer entrée into a white-collar career you need a graduate degree and a year or two of unpaid internships. Lawyers and doctors, the traditionally secure gateways into America’s upper middle class can easily amass hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of debt. A year of unemployment could wipe them out completely. Very few people who graduate with six-figures of un-dischargable debt will take risks. Every wonder why so many math and science PhDs are taking jobs on Wall Street? Wonder no more.
An entire generation of students has been snarled in debt. And for what? Why do we allow ourselves to be sucked into this disgusting situation? The truth is that in contemporary America, college has become a proxy for status. This torrent of debt, the millions of lives now locked in indentured servitude have gone to pay for little more than a signaling mechanism. A token that guarantees a modicum of basic reading and writing skills that ought to have been learned in high school. Education is no better now than it was twenty years ago when college tuition cost a tenth of what it does today. What college really is for, is to signal to one another that we are belong to a certain social class or rank.
Going to an elite private school tells someone that you were born into an upper-middle class family that knew enough to care about education and had the resources to pay for it. Smart in the United States really means belonging to the professional class. America’s supposed anti-intellectualism is really just subterranean class warfare. There is a reason why there are Supreme Court cases about something as seemingly so banal as college admission. The difference between going to University of Texas at Austin and Louisiana State University may not seem like much to an outsider but to an American, who doesn’t have an aristocratic title, or much of a family history, his or her college is the only tribal affiliation he or she has. And not getting into the one he or she thinks she deserves to get into feels like exile. It’s a social death. And this is why people are willing to borrow themselves into penury to go to college.
For-profit schools deservedly receive the most criticism but the non-profits and state schools deserve a heap of blame too. Useless masters degrees created for the sole purpose of sucking up student loan money. Enormous loans are recklessly dispersed to heavily indebted students and families. The so-called elite schools are as bad as any other. They exploit students just as much, the only difference is that their students can usually scrape together enough to eventually pay their loans back. But that isn’t because the content of what they are teaching is any better.
Our money has been spent on the most trivial things: foolish expansions overseas, stadiums, state-of-the-art gyms, dorms and centers, and above all the rapidly metastasizing administrations. Unnecessary deans, overlapping bailiwicks, admissions teams, compliance crews, lawyers, webmasters, layer after layer of bloat, almost all of it unnecessary, cushy and highly paid. The typical officer at a University earns more than an adjunct professor, and often receives the same package of benefits. Cadillac health insurance (subsidized by the student body), free tuition, scholarships for their children and a generous pension. A department director or assistant dean can easily command six figures and will leach off the system for years, even after they retire. The cruelest indignity may be that these parasites are eligible to have their own debts forgiven after ten years of “public service.”
Their snouts drip from feasting at the trough of our collective futures. Yet who could blame them? Universities act rationally. It’s the tragedy of the commons. They see a public good being devoured. Why not cram their faces in and glut themselves with it? Everybody else is doing it. Never mind their purported missions, which commit them to service for the public good. Besides, where is the outcry from parents and pupils?
Without decisive action, without amnesty, the parasite will kill the host. Our university system has been a sacred cow for too long. The system needs to be shocked. Let state schools consolidate if they have to, let the brilliant minds at our elite private schools dream up a cost-cutting solution. In Britain there barely are any administrators. Just professors and classrooms. Tuition must go down. Student loans must end. Demand this of whomever you vote on November 6th. And readers outside of the United States: Don’t ever let an abomination like this happen to your country.
Posted by James McGirk at 01:20 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Writing an otherwise perceptive and stirring essay, McGirk's passion is heavily qualified by the disappointing "neither" in the first sentence and the irresolute "whomever" in the final paragraph.
Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party, in her Economic Bill of Rights, part of her Green New Deal, recognizes "The right to a tuition-free, quality, federally funded, local controlled public education system from pre-school through college. We will also forgive student loan debt from the current era of unaffordable college education." A priority she reiterates as the first item on her financial-reform agenda.
And from her closing statement in the Oct 23rd third-party presidential debate: "I want to focus especially on those 36 million students and young people and recent graduates who are effectively indentured servants because of the high unemployment rate and the draconian unforgiving loans that have been customized especially for students lacking any consumer protections. If those students decided to stand up and go to the polls and come out and vote for a free public higher education, for ending student debt, for bailing out the students and breaking up the banks instead of the other way around, which is what they are doing, we could turn politics in this country on its head on November 6th."
Ignoring the Green Party and its presidential candidate (a physician who shares McGirk's recognition of the parasite and offers us treatment) lets the author write as a lone voice crying in the wilderness, but leaves his essay less effective and shows him less earnest as the instrument and agent of reform that they could be.
Posted by: Ethan | Oct 29, 2012 1:49:33 PM
Ethan,
You've pointed out a major omission from my essay.
I encourage anyone worried about their loans to consider 3rd party candidates like Dr. Jill Stein.
James
Posted by: James M. | Oct 29, 2012 2:36:22 PM
James,
I like your solution better than Jill's.
Your solution means that a good chunk of the money that universities expect to get has to come from stingy parents and students.
Jill's idea is that an endless sea of money get redistributed from continuously nagged taxpayers (Don't you want the best for you kids?) to the same useless administrators currently feeding at the public trough.
Posted by: DAS | Oct 29, 2012 4:31:53 PM
"feeding at the public trough"
perhaps the University should run itself - perhaps on the honor system funded only by people who can afford to send their children.
Posted by: Ray Butlers | Oct 30, 2012 11:59:42 AM
Perhaps a university's staff should be populated primarily by teachers and not by various and sundry "administrators".
Perhaps dorms should go back to being utilitarian places to sleep and study between classes rather than hipster condominiums.
Perhaps, etc.
Posted by: DAS | Oct 30, 2012 9:38:54 PM
Unfortunately, the glut of unnecessary administrators and HR is no longer just an American phenomenon. As an American attending grad school in the UK, I can say that this system has permeated many British institutions as well (though I suspect Oxbridge may still be doing it the old-fashioned way). I am not even allowed to grant extensions on student essays--they have to clear them through a central departmental administrator! Funny how government education cuts never seem to extend to the useless bureaucrats, just to teachers' salaries and to student services. There is no easy solution though. France still maintains a (practically) free university system, which I totally support in principle, but the schools lack basic resources, class sizes are huge, and there is no plan for how to continue.
Posted by: JD Silentio | Oct 31, 2012 11:18:19 AM
Post a comment