| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Trick or Truth? | Main | Monday Poem »

October 22, 2012

Obama vs Romney Is Not The Real Fight For America's Soul

by Evert Cilliers aka Adam Ash

Obama-romney-debateThe second Obama-Romney debate -- when Obama plucked Romney's lying tongue out of his face and liquified it on national TV -- was a highly satisfying spectacle. But this satisfaction may make one forget from where Obama's strongest opposition ought to come.

Not from the right. But from the left. 

Now that Romney has decided he's not so severely conservative as before, how much difference is there between him and Obama? About as much difference as between Jerry Sandusky and an errant Catholic priest. Obama is in essence a moderate Republican, willing to put Medicare and Social Security on the block as negotiating chips in a loony effort to reach a Grand Bargain with the GOP about our debt. That makes him an un-Democrat. True Democrats know, down in the depths of their gonads and ovaries, that Medicare and Social Security are inviolate items not to be bargained over.

But Obama is prepared to compromise. Give me a teeny tax raise on the rich and I'll raise the age for Social Security. Let me wet my green energy dick a tad more and I'll take it up the ass on Medicare. Let's face it: what with kill lists, illegal detentions, taking care of Wall Street instead of Main Street, and so on and on, Obama is no different from what a country-club Rockefeller Republican would be like today. No wonder he admires Reagan so much -- he's not that different from him, either.

Nor from Bill Clinton, perhaps the biggest wrecker of our economy ever. As a useful idiot of Robert Rubin, Clinton did two highly irresponsible Wall Street-enabling things during his presidency, and set the stage for the 2008 financial meltdown and our continuing Great Recession. Clinton signed the bill that repealed the Glass-Steagal Act that had kept investment banking and regular banking separate, and had given us financial stability for 50 years. And then he signed another bill that freed derivatives from any oversight or regulation; within a decade, mortgage-based derivatives blew up our economy. Today Obama follows Clinton's path as another useful idiot of Wall Street, relying on their stoolie Tim Geithner for his hands-off policies towards the big banks. 

So where is the real progressive alternative to Obama's GOP-lite policies?

First there are the professional progressives, such as Rachel Maddow and her MSNBC cohorts; news outlets like The Nation; active groups like MoveOn; and folks like Howard Dean, Michael Moore, Robert Reich, and the inimitable Rolling Stone reporter Matt Taibbi. And then there was the amazing Occupy Wall Street, who brought our 1%-versus-the-99% economic inequality to national prominence, and lodged this issue firmly in our political discourse. 

But these folks sit outside the political process; like Fox News, they create atmosphere, not policy. 

As far as actual political representation goes, the real alternative to Obama is neither Romney nor the Tea Party, but what one may call The Big Stealth Progressive Force in our politics. That would be the Democratic Progressive Caucus in the House, at present 76 members strong. This 76-member Caucus has continually come up with sane solutions to our biggest problems, yet they operate below the radar, since they're more or less ignored by the media. They're just not crazy enough to be big news. Witness their recent sensible budget plan, which did not get a scintilla of the ink garnered by the ludicrous Ryan plan, despite the fact that it is the sanest budget proposal out there.

Real change in America can only come when this Progressive Caucus becomes a fat enough tail to swing the entire Democratic dog. Howard Dean used to say he represented the democratic wing of the Democratic Party, and those are the folks we're talking about. To mention just a few prominent congressional progressives: Maxine Waters, John Lewis, Denis Kucinich, Bernie Sanders, Sherrod Brown, Nancy Pelosi, Al Franken. And this leaves out two very promising progressive newcomers: Elizabeth Warren and Alan Grayson. Besides the indefatigible Nancy Pelosi (without whose never-say-die guts Obamacare would've been a lost cause), these two individuals are just what we need to forge a progressive American future. Warren

For a start, they've got persuasive charisma in spades. And they're willing to fight like tigers on steroids. To my mind, Elizabeth Warren and Alan Grayson are the only Democrats who have the big mouths and the don't-back-down balls required to move a second-term Obama leftward. It is vitally important that Grayson gets back into Congress, and that Warren becomes a Senator. These two fighters are the brightest stars in the progressive firmament: the only two Democrats who have what it takes to inspire the nation like Obama once did, and who, unlike him, could become presidents who'd enact out-and-out progressive agendas.  

If we had a dominant Progressive Caucus in Congress, and a truly progressive president, we'd see some sharp shifts for the better in these United States. Only four presidents have made a progressive difference that brought about real change in America: Theodore Roosevelt with his trust-busting, FDR with Glass-Steagal and Social Security, Richard Nixon with the EPA, and LBJ with Medicare, Head Start, food stamps and civil rights. Obama took a step in the right direction with Obamacare, but without the public option, it's still a major suckup to the health insurance industry and Big Pharma. Grayson

Two eager warriors like Warren and Grayson may help spur Obama to become the fifth progressive president. And should Obama resist doing anything progressive in his second term -- say about climate change, or immigration, or re-adjusting the Supreme Court from its rightwing bias to a leftwing slant -- there is always 2016. If Hillary doesn't run then, imagine a Warren-Grayson ticket. Imagine electing a President with progressive convictions, instead of the compromising Blue Dog that Obama has turned out to be.

Warren-Grayson 2016. Something to hope for, folks. Unlike Obama, that's a real change one can really believe in. The solidly progressive change our country desperately needs to keep the American Dream alive and kicking.

Posted by Evert Cilliers at 12:05 AM | Permalink

Comments

Obama vs Romney may not be the real fight. But it is a prerequisite to win the real fight.

The way I see it is if Romney we sit will be game over for any progressive action for a long time. If Obama wins, the fight would have just begun, but at least there will be opportunity for battle.

Posted by: addicted | Oct 22, 2012 9:25:54 AM

That's about right. And kudos for nailing a top flight Sandusky line.

Posted by: Akim Reinhardt | Oct 22, 2012 9:43:22 AM

Another great article.

Mazel tov, Evert!


P.S. Steagall has two Ls.

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Oct 22, 2012 10:43:06 AM

The Super Bowl and the World Series are not games played by your two favorite teams -- they are contests between the two teams that slugged and fought their way quarter by quarter and inning by inning to slim margins of victory over your favorite team.

Posted by: kirk | Oct 22, 2012 10:55:01 AM

Obama may be close to Reagan but Romney is closer to Atilla the Hun than he is to Reagan. Wake up America

Posted by: rallen | Oct 22, 2012 12:33:12 PM

My biggest surprise in this election cycle is how little Democrats have mentioned Bush. I would've thought it'd be enough to say Bush/Republicans caused the depression/recession and Obama/Democrats saved us, along with a few charts to illustrate the point. Democrats would win in a landslide, wouldn't they? But instead they're letting Romney get away with saying the economy feels bad so blame Obama. I really thought in 2008 that Republicans would never regain control in 20 years, and the big ideological debates we'd be having would be with people like Obama positioned on the right, yet here we are...

Well, I didn't expect the Tea Party craziness in 2010 either, where they won on the Obamacare = socialism message. Of course those people will now presumably vote for Romney = creator of Obamacare, somehow without their heads exploding...

Posted by: billy | Oct 22, 2012 1:57:56 PM

@billy - I so agree with you! It is true that the Dems are going to a public that was brilliant enough to re-elect a George Bush who had cheated them into a war in Iraq. That I'm sure is very unsettling to any rational politician. But ... even so ...

Posted by: Vivek Tandon | Oct 22, 2012 3:13:48 PM

No politician is going to save us. There is no one out there who will appear, run for office, and do the right thing. It's not going to happen. You can't even run for office unless you've got millions of dollars from wealthy backers to finance the campaign, which means you've sold your vote from you take office.

The only way we will get real change in this country is from progressive organizations, created at a local level, to represent specific interest groups. Let's say a black group, hispanic, women, labor, seniors, gay/lesbian, immigrant, children, the poor, disabled. Everybody comes together under an umbrella as a coalition of Americans for peace and justice. Every separate group has its list of priorities, and negotiate with each other very specifically to support each other's actions.

For example, the women's group lists as its priorities: (1) equal pay for comparable work; (2) an equalizing paycheck to all women workers paid 4 times/year funded by a tax on employers who do not have equal pay, and equal numbers of women in good paying positions; (3) free birth control; (4) free abortion through the first 6 months, consistent with Roe vs. Wade, and thereafter if the life of the mother requires.

Now we have an immigrant group, and they have their priorities. But their members will not agree to support women on the abortion issue. Okay, no deal. You don't support us, we don't support you. The immigrant group does not get to tell the women's group what it is they can ask for. No thanks. This is a negotiated support agreement, that's it. If you don't like what the women demand, keep in mind that nobody asked for your approval or opinion.

Negotiated agreements: you choose your demands, other groups choose their demands. Your group comes out four times/year to support the women's group in specific activities on the street such as picketing, rallies, public activities. And vice versa.

Let's say the labor group does not support gay marriage. Tough. Either support the gay group's demands or get out of the coalition. This isn't the usual organization in which a few white men dictate to everyone else what it is they're allowed to think, believe, or want. This is independent groups making their own decisions and not asking for anyone else's approval.

You may not always get along, but by working together you can get ahead.

Every person in any of these groups should plan to be on the street at least one day/week actively supporting somebody's demands.

The more people get used to being out on the streets, the quicker it will become just another part of their regular life.

You get enough people in coalitions, local then state then national, all with negotiated agreements to support each other, we can take over the country. And we won't need some liberal politicians to tell us what they are willing to do. We will tell them what we demand, and we will shut down the country with our public demonstrations until we get it. It is our country, remember.

Most liberals support Obama because he's handsome and black. The truth is, he had no vision when he took office beyond his personal ambition to get elected. He really didn't know what to do because most of his life has been spent glad-handing people to get ahead, not actually running anything. He put the economy in the hands of Wall Street, put foreign affairs in the hands of Robert Gates and Hillary Clinton (a hawk), and put the jobs program in the hands of the head dude from GE responsible for outsourcing.

The big secret is that Obama never intended to do anything to help working people in this country. But don't tell the liberals -- they'll get all hysterical if you say it.

Is he better than Romney? Who isn't? But not much.

Posted by: NABNYC | Oct 22, 2012 3:36:08 PM

Very eloquent, NABNYC!

The problem is that corporations have human rights and run the government.

https://movetoamend.org/

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Oct 22, 2012 3:49:08 PM

http://www.davidkorten.org/

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Oct 22, 2012 4:00:24 PM

Excellent as always.

Posted by: Maniza | Oct 22, 2012 5:49:45 PM

@NABNYC: That's more or less the way I think things should happen. Here we have lots of progressive groups who do major actions together, and there's pretty much agreement on each others' agendas. We don't feel our needs conflict, and pretty much agree on what needs to be changed in this country. There are lots of peace groups; CodePink,World Can't Wait,IVAW,AFSC,and lately there are Palestinians and Egyptians and other immigrant groups; there's the Longshoremen's Union, who are awe-inspiring, nurses' unions, the SEIU and often others; usually the Greens and Gray Panthers and Raging Grannies and Peace and Freedom Party. We can get thousands of people together and we pretty much see eye to eye, but what do we do then? I've marched the whole length of Market St. and seen the sidewalks lined with tourists and blank faces, even in SF.

The truth is that those of us who pay attention, who actually care enough to try to make a change here, are a tiny vanguard.

I believe more "Americans" would be with us if they knew the things that we who pay attention know, but that would be too difficult for them. It would involve something like studying, learning, questioning. They're not going to take our word for anything, because we're out in the street, and we have no power, ipso facto, they know we can't take care of them, we have no job to offer, no special deals, no framework to hang onto. Compared to political thinking,let alone acting, THE GAME, and WHAT'S ON SALE AT NORDSTROMS, or Walmart, is just much more comfortable.

We have to come up with a much more sophisticated program than just marching, leafletting and online petitions.

Posted by: Alice de Tocqueville | Oct 22, 2012 6:18:18 PM

This is a reformist outlook, and in the rear view mirror.
Not saying that O is not better on woman's , workplace, sexual preference, and some environmental issues.
But the problem is systemic, and cannot be confronted in the voting booth.
Late stage capitalism is not fun.

Posted by: Dave Ranningdd | Oct 23, 2012 12:40:03 AM

Clinton is not the biggest wrecker of the economy ever. He may have started the ball rolling, but If you believe that the Bush administration was not largely responsible for the financial meltdown, you are insane. You can't blame the Democrats for throwing trillions of dollars down the drain invading Iraq.

Posted by: Georg | Oct 24, 2012 3:56:16 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

mr.ed on wagner in new york?

mirel on Here’s how to change the world

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

X on Getting Smarter

Ross Williams on Getting Smarter

oroboe on Lennon's "Imagine" and McCartney/Wings' "Band on the Run" overlaid: One way of reuniting (some of) the Beatles

Richard H. Randall on Obama must Make Fighting Climate Change National Project, or Die the death of a thousand Scandals

seth edenbaum on The First New Atheist? Kierkegaard

waqnis on Mortify Our Wolves

nogodrod on KFC smugglers bring buckets of chicken through Gaza tunnels

waqnis on Here’s how to change the world

Fernando on Mortify Our Wolves

seth edenbaum on The case against empathy

Dredd on Mortify Our Wolves

Max on Here’s how to change the world

Rohana on Mortify Our Wolves

Raza Husain on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

araldo on Here’s how to change the world

Elatia Harris on Here’s how to change the world

Sundar on Here’s how to change the world

araldo on Here’s how to change the world

prasad on Here’s how to change the world

araldo on Thursday Poem

Raza Husain on Here’s how to change the world

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed