October 15, 2012
Crazy People Make Sense
by Quinn O'Neill
Everyone knows there are crazy people around. You probably know a few personally and you can find plenty on the television and internet. These are the days of Honey Boo Boo and political attack ads that feature Big Bird. We live in a crazy world.
Crazy, however, is a pretty subjective term. It might mean delusional or stupid, or maybe just of a perspective that’s radically different from our own. The people you think are crazy might think the same of you and almost no one thinks himself crazy. Craziness is in the eye of the beholder.
Craziness also takes many forms, including religious fanaticism, science denialism, daredevilry and behaviors that might be described as “all kinds of crazy”. Folks who partake in such practices are often referred to with a variety of colorful terms like wingnuts, ass-hats, and dumbasses.
Given the amount of senseless and stupid behavior that we perceive, it might seem outrageous to claim that people - all people - make perfect sense. The crux of my argument rests on the idea that behaviors are caused, and to the extent that they are caused - fully, I believe - they will always make sense if the causal factors are understood.
This seems to be the approach that we intuitively take when we observe unusual behavior in animals. We don’t blame the animal and label it a dumbass, we assume there’s something causing the behavior, like an illness, the presence of another animal, or the animal’s having been trained by humans. A bizarre behavior could also have a strong genetic component; maybe it’s evolved because it’s adaptive or maybe it’s the result of a spontanteous deleterious mutation. In any case, we're likely to attribute the behavior to material causes rather than to blame the animal.
As animals, we should look at our own behavior in the same light. We can think and reason, but reasoning is just one of many factors that shape our actions. If we consider all of the relevant causal factors, even the most extreme human behaviors become comprehensible. A man eating another man’s face, for example, can be understandable in light of drug abuse or psychiatric disorders.
More subtle examples of silly and apparently irrational human behaviors abound and we’ve all
undoubtedly participated in some. Consider the graduation ceremony - an academic ritual with more pomp than a peacock could manage. Even the most educated participants flounce around in ornate priestly gowns and big floppy hats with tassles or plumes. I’ve done this a number of times myself and I couldn’t have felt more ridiculous if I’d been wearing a chicken suit; and yet this practice is commonplace. People have a desire to celebrate milestones and achievements; it meets psychological and emotional needs and makes us feel good about ourselves. Given that it's rewarding on some level, it makes sense that we do these things.
Even a common practice like skiing would undoubtedly seem bizarre to an alien observer who's unfamiliar with the practice. He might wonder why humans would strap thin boards to their feet and slide down snowy hills, an inherently risky behavior with no apparent purpose. The skier may spend an entire day going up the hill and down the hill, back up and back down, only to end up in exactly the same place where he started. How futile! But it takes little more than the skier's enjoyment of the activity for it to make sense. When we understand the reasons, we understand the behavior.
Irrational beliefs and ideas, like behaviors, are the products of causal factors. The beliefs themselves may not be logical, but it nevertheless makes sense that the believer holds them. The irrational belief could result from an innate lack of reasoning ability, ignorance or misinformation, or, like ceremonies, it may meet important psychological or social needs. There are reasons why people think crazy things and it often behooves us to figure out what they are.
Irrational beliefs and the behaviors they inspire aren't always bad. An athlete's belief that wearing his lucky socks will improve his competition performance isn't likely to cause much harm. Conversely, harmful behaviors aren't always associated with an irrational belief; sometimes they result from mental illness, drug abuse, social or family influences, desperation, or a range of other factors. But undeniably, there are harmful behaviors that would be worth preventing or modifying.
Understanding the factors that give rise to a harmful behavior gives us the best chance of modifying it. In many cases, common factors underlie a number of undesirable behaviors. Educational attainment and income inequality, for example, have been linked to violent crime, religiosity (and by extension religious fanaticism), smoking and drug abuse, and some kinds of science denialism. Improving access to education and reducing poverty are much more difficult than arguing with individuals, but they're more likely to be effective. People’s adherence to comforting but delusional beliefs would suggest that making sense of the world is sometimes less important than coping with it. In such cases, we shouldn’t expect appeals to reason to be persuasive.
When we encounter "wingnuts" and "dumbasses", instead of asking “what’s the matter with these people?” we should ask “what causes people to act this way?”. In the US, income inequality has grown over the past several decades and almost a quarter of children now live in poverty. The K-12 public education system has been demonstrably poor for decades and the cost of higher education is prohibitive and rising. The media provides the public with mixed and often misleading information serving only to further reduce public literacy. Considering these circumstances, it’s no wonder that the country’s awash with science denialism, religious fundamentalism, violent crime, ignorance, and irrationality. It’d be crazy if it weren’t.
Posted by Quinn O'Neill at 12:02 AM | Permalink






















Comments
You are considering the wrong problem. People intuitively know why other people think crazy things. We know there is a reason. We just don't care to find out what it is. That is the problem. And it is an even bigger problem than figuring out the causality of what we think are senseless acts. Just because you say the same thing fifty different ways doesn't mean it sounds any different. Our performances, are, in general, not compelling enough. We fail to illicit empathy in others. Our actions are contrived and unbelievable. Only when we learn the art of acting, and stop treating it as some natural born ability, will we be able to engage each other as humans worthy of each other's interest.
Posted by: Josef Stern | Oct 15, 2012 9:46:59 AM
I prefer "ass clown" to "ass hat," but otherwise agree.
Posted by: Akim Reinhardt | Oct 15, 2012 11:48:38 AM
"beliefs are merely tools - they don't need to be true, they just need to work" - kc
Posted by: Kim Cascone | Oct 15, 2012 12:35:03 PM
Is the person who made the following statement "crazy" or very perceptive?
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/best-summation-of-barack-and-michelle-ever
Mychal Massie is a respected writer and talk show host in Los Angeles
“The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn’t like the Obama’s? Specifically I was asked: “I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama’s? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disrespect) their Christmas family picture.”
The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation. I’ve made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don’t like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.
I don’t hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama’s raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.
I don’t like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagan’s made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. Obama’s arrogance by appointing 32 leftist czars and constantly bypassing congress is impeachable. Eric Holder is probably the MOST incompetent and arrogant DOJ head to ever hold the job. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?
Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama’s have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry, and they display an animus for civility.
I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to now being able to be proud of America. I view that statement and that mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world. Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same.
I have a saying, that “the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide.” No president in history has spent millions of dollars to keep his records and his past sealed.
And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies. He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother’s death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family. He has lied about his father’s military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nausea. He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address. He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman. He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today. He opposed rulings that protected women and children that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support. He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to Israel. His wife treats being the First Lady as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world). I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement – as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.
I don’t like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies. We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.
Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin; it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies. And I have open scorn for their constantly playing the race card.
It is my intention to do all within my ability to ensure their reign is one term. I could go on, but let me conclude with this. I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them, as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are. There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color.
As I wrote in a syndicated column titled, “Nero In The White House” – “Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood… Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation, and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement – while America’s people go homeless, hungry and unemployed.””
Mychal’s site: mychal-massie.com/ Quoted from the above link.
Posted by: w.j.abbe | Oct 15, 2012 12:53:12 PM
Mr. O'Neill makes an interesting point, one that should carry over to the subject of criminality.
I suggest this to illustrate the concept that awareness of causality does not mitigate behavior- whether crazy, or not.
Posted by: John Redican | Oct 15, 2012 2:48:11 PM
w.j.abbe, the person who wrote that statement, if he is sincere, is closer to "crazy" than "perceptive," but he is neither. Whatever his personal demons may be (paranoia? racism? mommy/daddy issues?) his specific belief set is a recognizable social phenomenon created by the closed-source media echo chamber that emerged from two or three decades of rightwing "hate" radio and its more recent television counterpart, Fox News.
This individual (again, if sincere) belongs to a subset of the American public that refuses to accept information that is incompatible with the socially constructed reality advanced by these media/propaganda outlets (and others, such as certain web sites and viral email). "Conservative" media creates a more-or-less internally coherent version of reality that feeds off and reinforces the fears and desires of its audience while inoculating them against contrasting evidence from external sources by floating the specter of a nefarious, mendacious "liberal media" that seeks to control them.
The world has seen this type of conditioning before; social movements based on fear and paranoia are nothing new. In the 1930s, the German people were indoctrinated to believe that Aryans were the master race destined to rule the world, while other people, particularly Jews, were vermin capable of nothing but evil and undeserving of life. Most (some would say all) people harbor at least some socially constructed beliefs, but for most of us these beliefs do not constitute obsessions that push us into destructive behaviors and blind us to all contradictory information.
So is the belief system insane? Yes, to the extent that it deviates from facts and general probabilities. Dangerously insane? Possibly. But can the afflicted person himself be considered insane? Doubtful.
Posted by: Susan | Oct 15, 2012 3:37:20 PM
And yet my grandfather who had a 6th grade education didnt vote against his own interests and country the way republicans do.
The fact is the information is out there they just arent interested since they are still fighting the civil war.
Posted by: mary m | Oct 24, 2012 3:47:15 PM
Post a comment