| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Amazing mind reader reveals his 'gift' | Main | Bad science gets busted »

September 26, 2012

New Stanford/NYU study documents the civilian terror from Obama's drones

Glenn Greenwald in The Guardian:

A vitally important and thoroughly documented new report on the impact of Obama's drone campaign has just been released by researchers at NYU School of Law and Stanford University Law School. Entitled "Living Under Drones: Death, Injury and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan", the report details the terrorizing effects of Obama's drone assaults as well as the numerous, highly misleading public statements from administration officials about that campaign. The study's purpose was to conduct an "independent investigations into whether, and to what extent, drone strikes in Pakistan conformed to international law and caused harm and/or injury to civilians".

The report is "based on over 130 detailed interviews with victims and witnesses of drone activity, their family members, current and former Pakistani government officials, representatives from five major Pakistani political parties, subject matter experts, lawyers, medical professionals, development and humanitarian workers, members of civil society, academics, and journalists." Witnesses "provided first-hand 
accounts of drone strikes, and provided testimony about a range of issues, including the missile strikes themselves, the strike sites, the victims' bodies, or a family member or members killed or injured in the strike".

Here is the powerful first three paragraphs of the report, summarizing its main findings:

Whilte noting that it is difficult to obtain precise information on the number of civilian deaths "because of US efforts to shield the drone program from democratic accountability", the report nonetheless concludes: "while civilian casualties are rarely acknowledged by the US government, there is significant evidence that US drone strikes have injured and killed civilians."

But beyond body counts, there's the fact that "US drone strike policies cause considerable and under-accounted for harm to the daily lives of ordinary civilians, beyond death and physical injury":

In other words, the people in the areas targeted by Obama's drone campaign are being systematically terrorized. There's just no other word for it. It is a campaign of terror - highly effective terror - regardless of what noble progressive sentiments one wishes to believe reside in the heart of the leader ordering it. And that's precisely why the report, to its great credit, uses that term to describe the Obama policy: the drone campaign "terrorizes men, women, and children".

More here.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 12:39 PM | Permalink

Comments

And to think that this warmonger president received a Nobel Peace Prize (without even trying).

Posted by: Félix E. F. Larocca, MD | Sep 26, 2012 6:10:51 PM

"Come tell us how you slew
Those poor Arabs two by two
Like the Zulus they had spears and bows and arrows,
How you bravely slew each one
With your sixteen pounder gun
And you frightened them poor natives to their marrow."

"Come Out Ye Black and Tans" by Dominic Behan

Posted by: FrankZ | Sep 26, 2012 8:59:04 PM

http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/1979-article-ties-obamas-real-father-to-saudi-financier/

Many aspects of Obama's life seem to be just as secret as the secret drone terror operation.

Is it any wonder most of the rest of the world hates America as they take our foreign aid?

Posted by: w.j.abbe | Sep 26, 2012 11:40:52 PM

Would Greenwald prefer a full-fledged military invasion to clean out the terrorist groups ensconced in the NWFP? Because there would be a lot more casualties from that blunt force military action than from the targeted drone attacks. Or, perhaps, Greenwald believes that the US has no business being in Afghanistan? And that the Al Qaeda are just the Islamic version of the American founding fathers, and that 9-11 was a Jewish conspiracy?

Posted by: Sam | Sep 27, 2012 3:09:35 AM

The impersonal flying machines in our arsenal. They kill bad guys and innocent civilians. Who is counting. Meantime, a corrupt head of state and his cronies laughing all the way to bank in Dubai.

Posted by: waqnis | Sep 27, 2012 11:38:45 AM

Really? You're kidding! Drones terrorize innocent human beings? Thank goodness for the hard working scholars at our nations fine universities! Where would we be without them?

Posted by: Suzanne Saturday | Sep 27, 2012 1:38:13 PM

The inclination to resort to terrorism as state policy preceded this corrupt head-of-state. He appears to be a lot more rationale and sensible than the current favorite of the masses. But he has to constantly watch his back because of a feckless and politicized judiciary and the same bunch of military geniuses who have inflicted on the country foreign flying robots raining death. Why isn't a fraction of the outrage expended on a ridiculous video directed instead at the military-industrial kleptocrats bleeding the country through a million self-inflicted wounds?

Posted by: Sam | Sep 28, 2012 12:04:33 AM

-Whistling tunes we hide in the dunes by the dessert
-Whistling tunes we piss on the goons in the mountains
It's a knockout
If looks could kill they probably will
In games without frontiers-wars without tears
(Apologies to PG)

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-17744-CIA-sends-monthly-fax-to-ISI-outlining-drone-attack-plans

About once a month, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) sends a fax to a general at Pakistan’s intelligence service outlining broad areas where the United States intends to conduct strikes with drone aircraft and Pakistanis, who in public oppose the strikes, don’t respond, US officials have said....The ISI would send back a fax acknowledging receipt. The return messages stopped short of endorsing drone strikes. But in US eyes the fax response combined with the continued clearing of airspace to avoid midair collisions – a process known as “de-confliction” – represented Pakistan’s tacit consent to the programme.

Posted by: Sam | Sep 29, 2012 2:11:09 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

dthoko on The History of Typography - Animated Short

Richard on John Gray’s Godless Mysticism

Abbas Raza on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

nogodrod on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Bill on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Gezi Park

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Norman Costa on The Insanity Virus

Dave Ranning on Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations

Sundar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Sundar on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

musafir on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on Gezi Park

Raza Husain on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on The Insanity Virus

billy on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

rafiq on The Insanity Virus

Ben Schwartz on Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods

JonJ on Moving books

musafir on My Father: A Veteran's Story – Part 2

omar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed