September 26, 2012
New Stanford/NYU study documents the civilian terror from Obama's drones
Glenn Greenwald in The Guardian:
A vitally important and thoroughly documented new report on the impact of Obama's drone campaign has just been released by researchers at NYU School of Law and Stanford University Law School. Entitled "Living Under Drones: Death, Injury and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan", the report details the terrorizing effects of Obama's drone assaults as well as the numerous, highly misleading public statements from administration officials about that campaign. The study's purpose was to conduct an "independent investigations into whether, and to what extent, drone strikes in Pakistan conformed to international law and caused harm and/or injury to civilians".
The report is "based on over 130 detailed interviews with victims and witnesses of drone activity, their family members, current and former Pakistani government officials, representatives from five major Pakistani political parties, subject matter experts, lawyers, medical professionals, development and humanitarian workers, members of civil society, academics, and journalists." Witnesses "provided first-hand
accounts of drone strikes, and provided testimony about a range of issues, including the missile strikes themselves, the strike sites, the victims' bodies, or a family member or members killed or injured in the strike".
Here is the powerful first three paragraphs of the report, summarizing its main findings:
Whilte noting that it is difficult to obtain precise information on the number of civilian deaths "because of US efforts to shield the drone program from democratic accountability", the report nonetheless concludes: "while civilian casualties are rarely acknowledged by the US government, there is significant evidence that US drone strikes have injured and killed civilians."
But beyond body counts, there's the fact that "US drone strike policies cause considerable and under-accounted for harm to the daily lives of ordinary civilians, beyond death and physical injury":
In other words, the people in the areas targeted by Obama's drone campaign are being systematically terrorized. There's just no other word for it. It is a campaign of terror - highly effective terror - regardless of what noble progressive sentiments one wishes to believe reside in the heart of the leader ordering it. And that's precisely why the report, to its great credit, uses that term to describe the Obama policy: the drone campaign "terrorizes men, women, and children".
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 12:39 PM | Permalink






















Comments
And to think that this warmonger president received a Nobel Peace Prize (without even trying).
Posted by: Félix E. F. Larocca, MD | Sep 26, 2012 6:10:51 PM
"Come tell us how you slew
Those poor Arabs two by two
Like the Zulus they had spears and bows and arrows,
How you bravely slew each one
With your sixteen pounder gun
And you frightened them poor natives to their marrow."
"Come Out Ye Black and Tans" by Dominic Behan
Posted by: FrankZ | Sep 26, 2012 8:59:04 PM
http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/1979-article-ties-obamas-real-father-to-saudi-financier/
Many aspects of Obama's life seem to be just as secret as the secret drone terror operation.
Is it any wonder most of the rest of the world hates America as they take our foreign aid?
Posted by: w.j.abbe | Sep 26, 2012 11:40:52 PM
Would Greenwald prefer a full-fledged military invasion to clean out the terrorist groups ensconced in the NWFP? Because there would be a lot more casualties from that blunt force military action than from the targeted drone attacks. Or, perhaps, Greenwald believes that the US has no business being in Afghanistan? And that the Al Qaeda are just the Islamic version of the American founding fathers, and that 9-11 was a Jewish conspiracy?
Posted by: Sam | Sep 27, 2012 3:09:35 AM
The impersonal flying machines in our arsenal. They kill bad guys and innocent civilians. Who is counting. Meantime, a corrupt head of state and his cronies laughing all the way to bank in Dubai.
Posted by: waqnis | Sep 27, 2012 11:38:45 AM
Really? You're kidding! Drones terrorize innocent human beings? Thank goodness for the hard working scholars at our nations fine universities! Where would we be without them?
Posted by: Suzanne Saturday | Sep 27, 2012 1:38:13 PM
The inclination to resort to terrorism as state policy preceded this corrupt head-of-state. He appears to be a lot more rationale and sensible than the current favorite of the masses. But he has to constantly watch his back because of a feckless and politicized judiciary and the same bunch of military geniuses who have inflicted on the country foreign flying robots raining death. Why isn't a fraction of the outrage expended on a ridiculous video directed instead at the military-industrial kleptocrats bleeding the country through a million self-inflicted wounds?
Posted by: Sam | Sep 28, 2012 12:04:33 AM
-Whistling tunes we hide in the dunes by the dessert
-Whistling tunes we piss on the goons in the mountains
It's a knockout
If looks could kill they probably will
In games without frontiers-wars without tears
(Apologies to PG)
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-17744-CIA-sends-monthly-fax-to-ISI-outlining-drone-attack-plans
About once a month, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) sends a fax to a general at Pakistan’s intelligence service outlining broad areas where the United States intends to conduct strikes with drone aircraft and Pakistanis, who in public oppose the strikes, don’t respond, US officials have said....The ISI would send back a fax acknowledging receipt. The return messages stopped short of endorsing drone strikes. But in US eyes the fax response combined with the continued clearing of airspace to avoid midair collisions – a process known as “de-confliction” – represented Pakistan’s tacit consent to the programme.
Posted by: Sam | Sep 29, 2012 2:11:09 PM
Post a comment