August 27, 2012
Tina Brown, Christopher Hitchens, Niall Ferguson, Rupert Murdoch -- What's With Our American Blindness To These Imported British Assholes?
by Evert Cilliers aka Adam Ash
The musical British invasion of the 60s and 70s brought us the Beatles, the Stones, Herman's Hermits, the Dave Clark Five, the Searchers and other great bands, who made us realize anew that American music was the greatest popular music ever, as these imports sold back to us and reminded us of our best blues and Tin Pan Alley traditions.
The journalistic British invasion of the 80s and 90s brought us Tina Brown, Christopher Hitchens, Niall Ferguson and Rupert Murdoch -- assholes all, who have lowered the intellectual tone of American journalism and brought us cheap sensationalism and provocation for the sake of provocation and nothing else.
One reason we Americans are so easily blinded by these assholes is simply their accents: Americans have always thought that the British accent denotes great intelligence. I mean, Shakespeare in a British accent sounds more elegant than played in American accents, doesn't it -- despite the fact that the accent of Shakespeare's own time was probably closer to American than Brit.
The other reason is that, because of a British liberal arts education, which is superior to its US counterpart, these folks can display remarkable erudition. Unlike most American journalists, they've actually read a lot -- enough to impress us Americans anyway.
The third reason is their intellectual smugness. We take this as a sign of their intellectual superiority, but it's nothing but an infuriatingly annoying British smug shallow high-table confidence that the Oxbridge snobs have used to condescend to us and intimidate us for ages.
The British have undoubtedly gained by the good riddance of these assholes to the US, but their gain is our loss. Let's see how deep this loss goes, by taking these assholes in turn.
1. Asshole Tina Brown. This lass edited The Tatler in Britain, where she refined her lifetime mission of producing shallow sucking-up-to-celebrities shit for snotnoses. She was then imported to the USA to run Vanity Fair, and turned this People Magazine for snotnoses into a great success, owing to an amazing number of heretofore undiscovered shallow snotnoses in America. Then she went on to edit The New Yorker, and in one fell swoop managed to traduce the tradition of an erstwhile intellectually rigorous magazine down to the level of Vanity Fair or even People Magazine. Before she came on board, one could easily spend 40 minutes reading The New Yorker. After her, it took a mere ten minutes to get through its trashy writing (Christ, this was the magazine who once upon a time had Pauline Kael as their movie reviewer; now they review any old Hollywood crap). After mucking about with the Weinsteins on the extremely shallow and short-lived sucking-up-to-celebrities-shit Talk Magazine, Tina Brown then, thank God, safely sidelined herself to her internet changeling, The Daily Beast, a perfect reflection of her shitty shallow taste, being a kind of poor man's Huffington Post (which has now also swallowed Newsweek). Of course she also wrote a book about Princess Di.
2. Asshole Christopher Hitchens. This dude came to The Nation and quickly established a tradition of high-minded leftist writing. Then came 9/11, and along with the entire US nation, he lost his moral compass. Because the Aytollah Khomeini had told all Muslims to please kill his pal Salman Rushdie, and because he was familiar with Muslim fundamentalists like the Taliban ("fascism with an Islamic face"), Hitchens became an apologist for George W. Bush and Dick Cheney and their neocon wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. And this is a guy who revered George Orwell, and wrote a good book about him; wish that he had Orwell's moral acuity.
3. Asshole Niall Ferguson. This historian dude, whose historical thought gave him the amazing insight that the British Empire has been the main civilizing force in human history, got so excited by the Bush/Cheney wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, that he decided the American Empire could be the next great civilizing force in human history. Recently he penned a whack job on Obama in Newsweek, run by Tina Brown, that was so flawed on actual facts (really pathetic coming from a Harvard professor) that James Fallows, a fellow Harvard dude, apologized on behalf of his alumni for Ferguson's intellectual charlatanism. Tina Brown plus Niall Ferguson -- a perfect storm of British assholism.
4. Asshole Rupert Murdoch. What can one say about this pernicious individual, who with Fox News has tore an immense asshole in the innocent body of American journalism? I've said it all before, when I called him America's own Goebbels (read about it here).
When you feel yourself prone to cower before British erudition, smugness or their precious accent, consider this corrective: look how American comedians created the ultimate satire on British rock star pretension: This Is Spinal Tap, the final proof that Americans are smarter than Brits.
Weirdly enough, there's one Brit pundit import who changed for the better. Andrew Sullivan edited The New Republic at a very young age, and subsequently, very untrue to form, turned into a journalistic asset. He was one of the first in the field to make blogging a respectable field for punditry with his The Daily Dish, and as a gay Republican and Obama supporter, he may be the only sane Republican left in America.
On the other hand, there's Martin Amis. This modish, verbosity-sodden novelist and opinionist, who in his extensive oeuvre has not penned a single book as funny or as insightful as those from his pater, Kingsley Amis, has recently moved from Hampstead, London to Brooklyn, New York.
Heaven help us. With this latest British asshole in our midst, the invasion of assholes who blind us Americans with their accents, erudition and smugness, continues apace.
Who's next? Tony Blair? Hey, Tina dahlink, why don't you import him to blind us with a weekly column?
(Afternote: I have a book out, self-published at the moment, based on my many provocative posts to 3QD. It's called The Real Obama: Progressive Tiger or Wall Street Poodle? You'll never have more fun reading about politics. Only $12 -- order a copy here: lulu.com/product/paperback/the-real-obama-progressive-tiger-or-wall-street-poodle/18939747)
Posted by Evert Cilliers at 12:10 AM | Permalink






















Comments
You're onto us! However, Rupert Murdoch is not British. He was born in Australia and became a naturalized US citizen in 1985. Careful, or you'll lock up the wrong people.
Posted by: E Kite | Aug 27, 2012 3:37:04 AM
Since when was Murdoch British?
Posted by: Mike | Aug 27, 2012 3:38:09 AM
Murdoch has dual American and Australian citizenship. In another sense he fits the bill given his nefarious press kingdom on the other side of the pond.
Piers Morgan is another import who at times gives the impression he has the inside track on America in ways mere Americans simply don't.
The accent does seem to mesmerize. Even when Hitchens was talking total shit he was accorded more respect than he deserved. Why do you think the Irish have always suspected the English are full of it.
Posted by: j_93 | Aug 27, 2012 4:43:32 AM
There are plenty of Irish assholes, such as the Pat and Bay Buchanan siblings, to go around, too.
Posted by: mr.ed | Aug 27, 2012 5:49:35 AM
Yo! Dumbass! Murdoch is Australian, and his accent is pure Australian. Check your facts before connecting the unconnected,
Posted by: nickm | Aug 27, 2012 6:09:15 AM
Rupert Murdoch made his reputation for shitty rightwing journalism aligned with Page Three naked titties in Great Britain, and it is there where the nefarious methods of his phone-hacking minions have been exposed. He is a British asshole as far as I'm concerned.
Posted by: Adam Ash | Aug 27, 2012 6:25:58 AM
Lets not forget the Geico Gekko. Can somebody please deport this annoying British accented lizard? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acCfnwTpdxU
Posted by: Sundar | Aug 27, 2012 7:37:11 AM
1. I can't believe you ranked Herman'd Hermits among "great bands." Dude.
2. I prefer Cam-Ford to Ox-Bridge.
3. Yes, Assholes all. Though with the death of Hitchens, near imprisonment of Murdoch, and recession from print-media of Brown, I dare say Ferguson is the current reigning asshole. You might also mention he intentionally mispronounces his first name (should be like "Neil") just to be more of an asshole.
Posted by: Akim Reinhardt | Aug 27, 2012 9:22:37 AM
There is nothing more mind blowing to liberals/marxist socialists/commies than to have two far left yellow rags actually ink a view that deviates one iota from their left wing rooted ideology. Except when those deviations are splattered on the front pages of such left wing yellow rags as the Daily Beast and Newsweek, where even the most casual viewers can't help but notice. It's as if the Drudge Report or National Review dissed Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan. Oh, the horror. of course, Niall knew what he was doing, that's why he's now at Martha's Vineyard on vacation. What better place to sit back and gleefully watch the explosive, maniacle blowback.
Then there was the video of Obama's point man on the budget, Erskine Bowles dissing Obama and singing the praises of Paul Ryan on video throughout the internet. My God, I've never seen so many turncoats in my lifetime of following politics. It's as if someone kicked a hive fool of bees, again, and again, and again ... Lord, I can't express the sheer glee of the left and their neighborhood organizor being subjected to such painful reality.
Posted by: hoopsnow | Aug 27, 2012 9:35:00 AM
Add Martin Amis to this list. Hitchen's wife seems to be trying to make sure that his assholic franchise passes on to her. In a piece in the Telegraph, where else but the Telegraph in it she let's us know that she has piles and piles of his notes. So we can count on her becoming the CEO of that industry of his. Hitchen's brother used to be the editor of the Telegraph. Is he still there?
Posted by: Shn | Aug 27, 2012 9:58:31 AM
Sorry! You did have Martin Amis! Thanks!
Posted by: Shn | Aug 27, 2012 10:06:06 AM
Yeah, it's easy to be blinded by Murdoch's British accent. Christ, not only do you classify Murdoch as a British import - your central argument is the accent.
For that matter Niall Ferguson's Scottish burr hardly fits the intelligence denoting British accent archetype. Never let the facts get in the way of a good story, hey?
No fact-checkers at 3qd?
Posted by: cerebus | Aug 27, 2012 10:20:42 AM
Cerberus:
This morning there is a burr (not Scottish) up your ass. Do remove it if you want your week to be enjoyable.
Posted by: Adam Ash | Aug 27, 2012 10:29:14 AM
Evert,
Thank you! I always enjoy reading your posts.
Posted by: maniza | Aug 27, 2012 11:29:45 AM
Assholes abound, with many accents. And after that, they do not go away, might as well try to enjoy them.
Posted by: Pamela | Aug 27, 2012 11:45:48 AM
Wow, how very offensive and I'm neither British nor American. It has failed to be humorous, enlightening, and correct.
Posted by: Peter | Aug 27, 2012 11:59:43 AM
This is awesome. I've always thought that Jude Law, without his accent, would be nothing more than Sean William Scott.
Posted by: CZ | Aug 27, 2012 12:01:53 PM
That's going a bit easy on Hitchens. His pro-Bush period was by no means the only blot on Hitchens' record. It was always unnerving to encounter claims about matters of fact in his writing, knowing from experience how little it troubled their author to be caught in a lie. The corrections to his column in The Nation were always amusing to read in this light, particularly so considering that The Nation is famous for its fact-checkers. One imagines that half the fact-checkers worked themselves to exhaustion making their way three-quarters of the way through Hitchens' column, while the other half took care of the rest of the magazine.
When Hitchens had the opportunity to drop the name of a particularly well-connected patron, even his least sympathetic reader would have to cringe with vicarious embarrassment at the naked desperation of his longing for the recognition of the powerful. His breathless fawning over Paul Wolfowitz in the pages of The Atlantic may
represent the ultimate nadir of this sort of thing, both because of its extraordinary emotional intensity and because of the fact that the person at the center of it was Paul Wolfowitz, whom few would rank among the most charismatic of world figures.
Posted by: Acilius | Aug 27, 2012 1:13:50 PM
"What's all this FUSS I hear... about saving Soviet jewelry?"
I'm really appalled at the lack of fact-checking among writers these days.
Posted by: Kim Cascone | Aug 27, 2012 3:27:43 PM
No question the Irish have their share of a'holes too but Pat Buchanan Irish? Only in the way Americans with "connections" on the isles appropriate Irishness. His old man was of English, Scots descent with some Irish thrown in the mix. His mother had German ancestry. But hey it's a big club - Obama's "Irish" too.
Posted by: j_93 | Aug 27, 2012 3:30:23 PM
Ah, the ubiquitous Asshole. This complex, undervalued segment of our bodies has become(unfairly) the symbol of all that is stupid or evil. Could any of your Brit targets perform the sensitive, necessary tasks of our cloaca? Separating farts from shit? sparing us embarrassment in our sleep? Providing an outlet for noxious fumes? Let's find a new term to define banality, ignorance and opportunism.
Posted by: Lionel Libson | Aug 27, 2012 4:11:55 PM
What a sophomoric article! The response to people `who have lowered the intellectual tone of American journalism and brought us cheap sensationalism and provocation for the sake of provocation and nothing else.'...is to call them `assholes'! Maybe the proper response would be to hold your breath and stomp your foot...now that would be mature:)
Posted by: Abhishek | Aug 27, 2012 4:13:52 PM
Marvelous piece, about a very grand evil. You're too kind to Andrew Sullivan -- who is much too kind lately to his eternal pal Ferguson. Andrew was not so much a proto-blogger as the archetypal "War Blogger" in days when GWB's insane "let's change the map of the Middle East" assault on Iraq was being test-marketed. Andrew was 1000 percent for it, and unforgivably abusive of the good people and institutions who stood against it. The underlying problem is spelled EMPIRE, meaning this very British zest for military domination. I begin to conclude that it's an incurable disease in a very broad slice of the English people, especially these exports to these old colonies. Niall Ferguson, as you suggest, is the foolish face of it : a sort of clown prince in that nest of Brits who have invaded the chattering ranks in the US with the drumbeat: "It's your turn, Yanks... and we'll coach and cheer your ride on our old tiger." Tony Blair, who alone could have stopped George Bush, was the most consequential, alas; but then the blatherers keep at it, left and right, including (alas) my sort-of friend Simon Schama, Christopher Hitchens, Tina Brown of the dying despicable Newsweek and the money-losing Daily Beast, Homi Bhabha and others. But NOT the late and memorable real hard lefty Alexander Cockburn. Maybe it was the bit of (Prot) Irish in Cockburn, but he really shed that Perfidious Albion role. I knew somehow -- long before he embraced GWB's war in Iraq -- that Hitchens was an old unredeemable prep-school bully under that con of loving Orwell... Anyway I did want to share my own little moment with Niall Ferguson, on the radio at publication of his awful propaganda piece, "Empire," in late 2002 or early 2003 -- timed to press the venerable argument in favor of the US bringing law, commerce and the language of Milton and Shakespeare back to Baghdad. The dust jacket on Ferguson's book (which I still have) showed the British Navy in 18th Century glory, flying the Union Jack and firing incendiary bombs into some pathetic hinterland. I said to him: on closer inspection, it comes clear that the target of that attack is the city of Boston and Charlestown in particular during the Battle of Bunker Hill. I said: That's us, under those bombs, fighting the Redcoats" and still proud, many of us, of our anti-imperial moment. I think Ferguson blushed, and they definitely changed the cover of the book. Your piece, Mr. Cilliers/Ash, is a real service. Thank you!
Posted by: Christopher Lydon | Aug 27, 2012 4:46:14 PM
I was sure the Geico Gekko was as Australian as Rupert Murdoch
Posted by: Jonathan Shaw | Aug 27, 2012 5:25:51 PM
mike asks: Since when was Murdoch British?
well the fact that he was born before 1949 made him a british subject until we changed all
Citizenship by birth in Australia
Evidence of Australian citizenship by birth
Since the legal status of Australian citizenship came into force on 26 January 1949, there have been various changes to the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 relating to the acquisition of Australian citizenship by birth. Different rules apply, according to a person’s date of birth.
Information on the various kinds of documents that are acceptable as evidence of Australian citizenship is contained in DIAC form 119, Application for a Certificate of Evidence of Australian Citizenship. This form, and other citizenship information, is available from DIAC and at http://www.immi.gov.au/allforms/pdf/119.pdf
Posted by: jim sharp | Aug 27, 2012 8:09:30 PM
I agree. All arseholes. But this piece,too, has the smug tone of an 'asshole'.
Posted by: momo | Aug 27, 2012 8:21:38 PM
If Romney was polling better Sullivan would be rooting for him. He's a political opportunist, nothing else.
Posted by: wetcasements | Aug 28, 2012 1:16:24 AM
@jim sharp: yes that explains why all Australians born before 1949 have British accents....not.
Being subject to British crown does not make someone British. Otherwise I have half a billion pre-1947 Indians to offer.
Now for a list of the American a-holes who have left trails of destruction through Australia, the UK and elsewhere.
Posted by: Mike | Aug 28, 2012 3:22:22 AM
Come, come, my dear.
"intellectual tone of American journalism"
Surely a contradiction in terms.
Posted by: laturb | Aug 28, 2012 4:48:25 AM
"I was sure the Geico Gekko was as Australian as Rupert Murdoch"
No! Definitely 'estuary' London.
Posted by: laturb | Aug 28, 2012 4:58:29 AM
As has been said, Murdoch is Australian so we Brits can't claim him even if we wished. Two, Messers Ferguson and Amis, have come to you because we don't take them at their own valuation and have been snarky about them. If you ask nicely, there's a spare Hitchens whom we would be glad to see the back of. Tina Brown well isn't she mostly harmless and that leaves Piers who can be safely dumped in mid Atlantic thanks.
While we're on the cultural exchange you could do us a favour and take Janet Daley and Loyd Grossman back and please ban Irvin (Alka) Stelzer from writing for the UK press.
Posted by: Richard Thomas | Aug 28, 2012 10:16:11 AM
wow dude- this is dumb. to group hitchens with the rest of them is criminal..yes, they are all assholes but not all assholes are (taste?) the same..hitchens was provocative but he was brilliant..the others simply provoke and are not really known for their brains..ferguson has a post at harvard but there are very few who think that he has any scholarship to back that up..
Posted by: bubba | Aug 28, 2012 11:25:52 AM
Richard, Can we have Stephen Fry (and QI), please? Pretty please?
Posted by: Bryon | Aug 28, 2012 2:28:07 PM
Evert,
Pierce Morgan? You left him out.
Also interesting:The new HBO series Newsroom the character who plays the honest, sincere, bull in a china closet, smart, idealist has a British accent and a British background .
Posted by: Maniza | Aug 28, 2012 7:36:40 PM
Piers Morgan;)
Posted by: Maniza | Aug 28, 2012 10:36:41 PM
Author is right. Right about Murdoch too, even though Australian.
Problem of all you guys, whether English, American or Australian is that you are all infact English, you just think you are American and Australians now.
Get it in your head, repeat it after me "WE ARE ALL BRITISH AND YES WE ARE ALL ASSHOLES"
Posted by: India_Review | Aug 29, 2012 3:56:27 AM
Bravo Lionel Libson!
Posted by: Acilius | Aug 29, 2012 11:53:40 AM
Amen, Everett. Never mind the Hitchens fan club around here -- he has earned his spot on this list of assholes ten times over, and if anything you went way too easy on him, as Acilius points out in detail above.
By Hitchens' own standards, no decent person should ever read his books or essays. He was a firm believer in condemning the entire body of work of artists who at some point lent their celebrity to authoritarian violence: see, e.g., Dennis Perrin's 2003 story about Hitchens where Hitch petulantly demands that a barkeep turn off a radio playing Cat Stevens, erstwhile supporter of the Rushdie fatwa.
Application of the Hitchens Rule to the asshole himself means that, as soon as he started cheerleading for US atrocities in Iraq, all of his past writing retroactively became unreadable garbage. Which is how, out of respect for the man and his, ahem, "principles", we should all treat it.
http://www.citypages.com/2003-07-09/news/obit-for-a-former-contrarian/
Posted by: picador | Aug 29, 2012 2:15:27 PM
"I mean, Shakespeare in a British accent sounds more elegant than played in American accents, doesn't it -- despite the fact that the accent of Shakespeare's own time was probably closer to American than Brit."
The OU has an interesting video about this. To my ears, the accent sounds like West Country (think Somerset or Wiltshire), like The Wurzels.
Also, I'm surprised no-one has pointed this out yet, but Murdoch is actually Australian.
Posted by: Sagredo | Aug 29, 2012 10:28:51 PM
hitchens was a provocateur and an asshole many times over- I agree. but to put him in the company of these other morons is infantile. thats all bud..take it or leave it..
Posted by: bubba | Aug 30, 2012 11:30:28 AM
A case of ignorant pigeonholing used to write a silly article. Thanks for wasting my time.
Posted by: Bathrobe | Aug 31, 2012 9:41:01 AM
Post a comment