| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Conventional Wisdom | Main | Tuesday Poem »

August 27, 2012

Justin E. H. Smith to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Philosophy Prize

UPDATE 9/24/12: The winners have been announced here.

UPDATE 9/17/12: The finalists have been announced here.

UPDATE 9/15/12: The semifinalists have been announced here.

UPDATE 9/6/12: Voting round is now open. Click here to see full list of nominees and vote.

Dear Readers, Writers, Bloggers,

JustinWe are very honored and pleased to announce that Justin E. H. Smith has agreed to be the final judge for our 4th annual prize for the best blog and online writing in the category of philosophy. (Details of the previous three philosophy prizes can be seen by clicking on the names of their respective judges here: Daniel Dennett, Akeel Bilgrami, and Patricia Churchland).

Justin E. H. Smith is professor of philosophy at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada. Beginning in 2013 he will be Professeur des Universités at the Université de Paris 7-Denis Diderot. Completing a Ph.D. from Columbia University in 2000, his primary research focus over the past 15 years has been the history of metaphysics, philosophy of science, and natural philosophy in early modern Europe, with a particular interest in the philosophy of Leibniz. This interest culminated in 2011 with a lengthy study of Leibniz's theory of the generation, structure, and motion of living beings, entitled Divine Machines: Leibniz and the Sciences of Life. He has recently completed a book on the origins of so-called 'racial science' in the 18th century out of early modern philosophical debates about species taxonomy and the problem of natural kinds. This book, Nature, Human Nature, and Human Difference: Early Modern Philosophy and the Invention of Race, will appear from Princeton University Press, in 2013. He has also recently completed a translation and critical edition, with François Duchesneau, of Georg Ernst Stahl's Negotium otiosum, seu Skiamachia (1720), to appear from Yale University Press next year. He also has longstanding metaphilosophical and methodological interests in the relationship of philosophy to its history. This interest has recently culminated in an edited volume, with Eric Schliesser and Mogens Laerke, on this topic, to appear next year from Oxford University Press. Another major research project, under contract with Princeton University Press, is a book entitled A Global History of Philosophy, to 1700, which, thankfully, he has another five years to complete. In this connection, he has a developing research interest in classical Indian philosophy, particularly the philosophy of language in the Pāṇinian tradition, as well as the theory of the composition of bodies in Vaiśeṣika atomism. Running through this recent turn to comparative and so-called 'non-Western' philosophy is a serious interest in the nature of the philosophical project, including its anthropology and sociology, and its historical relationship to other, partially overlapping domains of human activity, particularly religious ritual and applied science. He also writes for the New York Times Stone series. More about his work can be found here: www.jehsmith.com/philosophy.

As usual, this is the way it will work: the nominating period is now open, and will end at 11:59 pm EST on September 3, 2012. There will then be a round of voting by our readers which will narrow down the entries to the top twenty semi-finalists. After this, we will take these top twenty voted-for nominees, and the four main editors of 3 Quarks Daily (Abbas Raza, Robin Varghese, Morgan Meis, and Azra Raza) will select six finalists from these, plus they may also add up to three wildcard entries of their own choosing. The three winners will be chosen from these by Justin Smith.

The first place award, called the "Top Quark," will include a cash prize of one thousand dollars; the second place prize, the "Strange Quark," will include a cash prize of three hundred dollars; and the third place winner will get the honor of winning the "Charm Quark," along with a two hundred dollar prize.

(Welcome to those coming here for the first time. Learn more about who we are and what we do here, and do check out the full site here. Bookmark us and come back regularly, or sign up for the RSS feed.)


Details:

PrizePhilosophyAnnounce2012The winners of this prize will be announced on September 24, 2012. Here's the schedule:

August 27, 2012:

  • The nominations are opened. Please nominate your favorite blog entry by placing the URL for the blog post (the permalink) in the comments section of this post. You may also add a brief comment describing the entry and saying why you think it should win. (Do NOT nominate a whole blog, just one individual blog post.)
  • Blog posts longer than 4,000 words are strongly discouraged, but we might make an exception if there is something truly extraordinary.
  • Each person can only nominate one blog post.
  • Entries must be in English.
  • The editors of 3QD reserve the right to reject entries that we feel are not appropriate.
  • The blog entry may not be more than a year old. In other words, it must have been written after August 26, 2011.
  • You may also nominate your own entry from your own or a group blog (and we encourage you to).
  • Guest columnists at 3 Quarks Daily are also eligible to be nominated, and may also nominate themselves if they wish.
  • Nominations are limited to the first 200 entries.
  • Prize money must be claimed within a month of the announcement of winners.

September 3, 2012

  • The nominating process will end at 11:59 PM (NYC time) of this date.
  • The public voting will be opened soon afterwards.

September 14, 2012

  • Public voting ends at 11:59 PM (NYC time).

September 24, 2012

  • The winners are announced.

One Final and Important Request

If you have a blog or website, please help us spread the word about our prizes by linking to this post. Otherwise, post a link on your Facebook profile, Tweet it, or just email your friends and tell them about it! I really look forward to reading some very good material, and think this should be a lot of fun for all of us.

Best of luck and thanks for your attention!

Yours,

Abbas

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 01:00 AM | Permalink

Comments

Metaphysical determinism
http://evolvingthoughts.net/2012/05/metaphysical-determinism/

in which I argue that we should revisit the idea that science is somehow necessarily constrained by metaphysical presuppositions.

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | Aug 27, 2012 6:03:59 AM

Excellent rhetorical and historical reflections on Hegel and the nature of thought.

Posted by: Markus Quade | Aug 27, 2012 8:06:26 AM

Excellent rhetorical and historical reflections on Hegel and the nature of thought.

http://thehegeldiaries.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/kritik-des-unreinen-gedankes-2/

Posted by: Markus Quade | Aug 27, 2012 8:17:41 AM

I will nominate my post, Toward a Philosophically Sound & Bioethically Sensitive Definition of Public Health Law at Ratio Juris:

http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/2012/07/toward-philosophically-sound.html

Posted by: Patrick S. O'Donnell | Aug 27, 2012 8:19:38 AM

An argument against the current use of drones and precision-guided munitions in contemporary conflict from the NYT Opinionator:

Posted by: John Kaag | Aug 27, 2012 9:19:04 AM

An argument against the current use of drones and precision-guided munitions in contemporary conflict from the NYT Opinionator:

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/22/the-moral-hazard-of-drones/

Posted by: John Kaag | Aug 27, 2012 9:20:54 AM

Self-nomination: "If panpsychism is true, then vegans are screwed":

http://mpianalto.blogspot.com/2011/12/if-panpsychism-is-true-then-vegans-are.html

Posted by: Matt Pianalto | Aug 27, 2012 9:48:14 AM

Elizabeth Anderson: "Recharting the Map of Social and Political Theory: Where is Government? Where is Conservatism?"
http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2012/06/recharting-the-map-of-social-and-political-theory-where-is-government-where-is-conservatism/

Posted by: Matt Zwolinski | Aug 27, 2012 9:48:22 AM

Wes Widner's "A Crash Course In Existentialism" which examines Sartre's famous lecture in relation to divine knowledge, Schleiermacher, and humanism.

http://reasontostand.org/archives/2011/08/30/crash-course-on-exestentialism-with-sartre

Posted by: Danny | Aug 27, 2012 9:54:18 AM

A blog post that deals with understanding reality.

Posted by: kaushik M | Aug 27, 2012 10:35:55 AM

A blog post that deals with understanding reality.

http://devilsanalysis.blogspot.in/2011/06/inscrutable-reality.html#links

Posted by: kaushik M | Aug 27, 2012 10:36:54 AM

Michael Stark's examination of Søren Kierkegaard's ideas on faith and uncertainty.

http://michaeldstark.wordpress.com/2012/08/19/faith-and-uncertainty/

Posted by: Archer | Aug 27, 2012 10:49:29 AM

I offer:
http://tomkow.typepad.com/tomkowcom/2012/07/a-few-short-steps-to-the-gallows.html

Posted by: Tomkow | Aug 27, 2012 11:02:09 AM

Singer's Pond and Quality of Will:
http://www.philosophyetc.net/2012/04/singers-pond-and-quality-of-will.html

Posted by: Richard Yetter Chappell | Aug 27, 2012 11:22:50 AM

Love's Ladder's God: an affective argument for God's existence using Plato's *Symposium* and Augustine's *Confessions* against Nietzsche's critique from *On Genealogy of Morality* and *Thus Spoke Zarathustra*.

http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2012/04/05/loves-ladders-god/

Posted by: Patrick Lee Miller | Aug 27, 2012 11:35:10 AM

My critique of a prominent text of Hindu philosophy, the Bhagavad Gita.
http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2011/12/the-bhagavad-gita-revisited-part-2.html

Posted by: Namit | Aug 27, 2012 11:35:43 AM

I proffer Amanda Silbernagel's "Prophecy and Abstraction in a Passionless Age":

http://www.amandasilbernagel.com/?p=3288#more-3288

Posted by: Jaime | Aug 27, 2012 11:41:51 AM

Excellent as always for 3DQ, Abbas, and his collaborators!

But:

The winners of this prize will be announced on June 25, 2012. Here's the schedule:

Posted by: Félix E. F. Larocca, MD | Aug 27, 2012 11:46:42 AM

A post on "The Philosophical Significance of the Higgs 'Discovery'" at ttahko.net:

http://www.ttahko.net/2012/the-philosophical-significance-of-the-higgs-discovery/

Posted by: Tuomas | Aug 27, 2012 12:10:23 PM

"Galen Strawson, Buddhist Philosopy, and Radical Self-Awareness"

http://www.waggish.org/2011/galen-strawson-and-radical-self-awareness/

Posted by: David Auerbach | Aug 27, 2012 12:32:59 PM

Online philosophical writings that are not blogs count, right? If so, the scope of this book is absolutely astonishing-- I nominate my favorite chapter, Part I, Chapter 7, "What is 'me'?", which examines the nature of conscious selfhood and revolutionizes morality in this context.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/87848420/The-Fates-Unwind-Infinity

Posted by: Richard Greendale | Aug 27, 2012 1:25:21 PM

A self nomination:

http://wordsideasandthings.blogspot.com/2012/05/heterosexual-redefinition-of-marriage.html

Posted by: Garren | Aug 27, 2012 1:45:47 PM

I would suggest:

http://www.rotman.uwo.ca/2012/beyond-turf-wars/

Posted by: Theophrastus | Aug 27, 2012 1:55:33 PM

I would like to nominate Douglas Glover's "Mappa Mundi: The Structure of Western Thought"

http://www.brooklynrail.org/2011/09/fiction/mappa-mundi-the-structure-of-western-thought

Posted by: Melissa | Aug 27, 2012 2:53:32 PM

Self-Nomination: my post on Ai Weiwei and Heidegger's Das Ding http://www.tangdynastytimes.com/2012/06/das-ding.html

Posted by: Leanne Ogasawara | Aug 27, 2012 3:44:51 PM

If humor writing is allowed, I nominate my post on Kripke faking the results of his thought experiments:

http://fauxphilnews.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/kripke-resigns-after-allegations-of-academic-fraud

Posted by: Ben | Aug 27, 2012 7:32:36 PM

Okay, here's mine:

http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2011/09/what-kind-of-perspectivist-is-nietzsche.html

Posted by: Dave M | Aug 27, 2012 8:27:59 PM

I'd like to nominate Gregory Sadler's blog post: "Is Kierkegaard's Present Age Our Own?"

http://gbsadler.blogspot.ca/2012/05/is-kierkegaards-present-age-our-own.html

Posted by: James Wong | Aug 27, 2012 9:10:06 PM

As usual, this kind of great announcement invites curiosity, is Justin an Aspie?, asks one of my patients

If so, what?

http://www.monografias.com/trabajos50/autismo-entendimiento/autismo-entendimiento.shtml

Posted by: Félix E. F. Larocca, MD | Aug 27, 2012 9:49:44 PM

http://socioproctology.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/joshua-greene-kants-sick-joke.html

Posted by: windwheel | Aug 28, 2012 7:19:56 AM

I think the 'End Times' series of interviews by Richard Marshall at www.3ammagazine.com merits consideration for their eclectic breadth.

Posted by: Karen Eliot | Aug 28, 2012 7:23:29 AM

Karen, you must nominate a single blog post.

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Aug 28, 2012 9:12:55 AM

Best judge yet!


http://yeahokbutstill.blogspot.ca/2012/05/what-self-are-we-failing-to-discover.html

Posted by: N | Aug 28, 2012 1:51:08 PM

Self nomination (shameless self plug) http://sronicker.blogspot.com/2012/08/morality-of-drone-strikes-response.html

My response to the drone strike issue.

Posted by: Sam | Aug 28, 2012 6:01:25 PM

Self-Nomination: Cognitive Access: The Only Game in Town

http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/2011/12/13/cognitive-access-the-only-game-in-town/

Posted by: Richard Brown | Aug 28, 2012 6:12:11 PM

http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/imagining-god-creating-poppies/

A terrific example of one of these End Times interviews by Richard Marshall. I thought this is one of the best - characteristically both illuminating and quirky

Posted by: Diane Coyle | Aug 29, 2012 7:09:07 AM

Is ‘nothing’ relative? (IX): How Leibniz should have posed the ‘ultimate why-question’

http://emto.tumblr.com/post/21435956960/is-nothing-relative-ix-how-leibniz-should-have

Posted by: Stefan Heßbrüggen | Aug 29, 2012 7:10:08 AM

Self nomination: "Freaks and Geeks and Ordinal Proportionality" at Flickers of Freedom.

http://agencyandresponsibility.typepad.com/flickers-of-freedom/2012/01/freaks-and-geeks-and-ordinal-proportionality.html

Posted by: Tamler Sommers | Aug 29, 2012 9:04:46 AM

Self nomination: "Factive Verbs and Protagonist Projection" at Experimental Philosophy. Do people think it's possible to know false things?

http://experimentalphilosophy.typepad.com/experimental_philosophy/2012/01/factive-verbs-and-protagonist-projection.html

Posted by: Wesley Buckwalter | Aug 29, 2012 12:17:00 PM

Consistently intriguing interview with Katerina Deligiorgi by Richard Marshall at 3am magazine.

Posted by: Bridget McP | Aug 29, 2012 7:53:51 PM

The Chinese Nation and the Scattered Brain:

http://philosophicalpontifications.blogspot.com/2012/04/chinese-nation-and-scattered-brain.html

In his article “Troubles with Functionalism”, Ned Block outlines a thought experiment that he takes to be a counterexample to functionalism, the thesis that if two or more beings are identical in how they function they have (or are capable of having) the same mental states. In this post I argue, using a different thought experiment, that if Block’s argument refutes functionalism it also refutes materialism for precisely the same reasons.

Posted by: Jason Zarri | Aug 30, 2012 5:33:40 AM

Democracy is not a truth machine

http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2010/11/democracy-is-not-truth-machine.html

Posted by: Philosopher's Beard | Aug 30, 2012 9:42:59 AM

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/28/are-we-ready-for-a-morality-pill/

Posted by: anonymous | Aug 30, 2012 10:10:35 AM

The Moral Significance of Sex Workers and People With Disabilities

http://bigthink.com/against-the-new-taboo/the-moral-significance-of-sex-workers-and-people-with-disabilities?page=all

Posted by: TauriqM | Aug 30, 2012 12:59:55 PM

http://orienteringsforsok.blogspot.no/2012/08/meaning-and-mortality.html

This post was originally written in Norwegian. But I made a hasty word-by-word translation of it to have it nominated here. Originally posted October 19th 2011.

Posted by: Vidar Halgunset | Aug 30, 2012 4:52:02 PM

I want to nominate Namit Arora's article on the ethics of eating animals in America

http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2012/06/on-eating-animals.html

Posted by: Usha | Sep 1, 2012 2:17:22 AM

I would like to nominate Richard Marshall at www.3ammagazine.com for his truly incredible 'End Times' series of interviews - engaging, captivating and simply the best!!

Posted by: Naheed Rana | Sep 1, 2012 8:47:14 AM

Self-nomination: http://languagegoesonholiday.blogspot.com/2011/09/and-you-may-say-to-yourself-my-god-what.html

Posted by: Duncan Richter | Sep 1, 2012 10:32:25 AM

I think the 'End Times' series of interviews by Richard Marshall at 3ammagazine.com are brilliant! Once again he captures it all whilst biding his time…

Posted by: Sammy Jo | Sep 2, 2012 9:31:33 PM

I would like to nominate Richard Marshall's interview imagining god creating poppies at 3am

Posted by: Terry | Sep 2, 2012 9:37:32 PM

I would like to self-nominate my post titled "Atheist Morality: Ratcheting Forward"
It features me having real and theoretical discussions about the origin of morals with Ken Miller, Sean Carroll, AJ Johnson, and PZ Myers.
Cheers,
Kris

http://www.tompainesghost.com/2012/09/atheist-morality-ratcheting-forward.html

Posted by: Kris | Sep 3, 2012 12:58:25 AM

'Awakening Benjamin,' Richard Marshall's conversation with Eli Friedlander, & part of the End Times series:

http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/awakening-benjamin/

Posted by: Susan | Sep 3, 2012 5:03:24 AM

"A Time for Beauty, A Time for Disfigurement":

http://www.amandasilbernagel.com/?p=3323#more-3323

Posted by: Owl | Sep 3, 2012 4:48:13 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

SteveRR on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

jo smith on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

Grace on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Elatia Harris on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Abbas Raza on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Jonathan on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Bill on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Louise Gordon on The need for critical science journalism

omar on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

Jonathan on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Bill on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

jo smith on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

carlos on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

freddie on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Eli on "Everybody Hurts" by Sachal Studios, Lahore, Pakistan

Jalees Rehman on The need for critical science journalism

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Scrutineer on Why race as a biological construct matters

prasad on the culture animal

Mitt Romney's Dog on Why race as a biological construct matters

Elatia Harris on The Moral Status of Rocks

prasad on The Moral Status of Rocks

Raza Husain on The Moral Status of Rocks

Fred on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed