July 07, 2012
why does the world exist?
That question — "Why is there something rather than nothing?" — occupies the center of Holt's book, which is by turns a philosophical and scientific inquiry, written through a broadly personal lens. Beginning with his discovery of this "ultimate why question" as a teenager reading Heidegger, Holt frames his investigation as a series of conversations with luminaries from the academic and cultural worlds. In these pages, we meet Sir Roger Penrose, who in 1970 with Stephen Hawking showed that the Big Bang "must have been a singularity" — a self-contained event with no deterministic cause. We hear from Nobel physics laureate Steven Weinberg and novelist John Updike, University of Pittsburgh philosopher Adolf Grünbaum and theologian Richard Swinburne. The subjects share a curiosity, a quality of engagement, in the face of everything they cannot know. What Holt is asking, after all, is unanswerable, which means that any response, even the most nuanced, must be conditional in the most fundamental sense. "Would the search prove futile?" the author wonders after visiting Weinberg in Austin, where he teaches at the University of Texas. "Perhaps. But that made it all the more noble, in a Sisyphean way."more from David L. Ulin at the LA Times here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 08:20 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Why are we here?
Because we're here
Roll the bones
Why does it happen?
Because it happens
Roll the bones
-Neil Peart of Rush
Posted by: The Clock | Jul 7, 2012 9:59:31 AM
Why are we here? What's life all about?
Is God really real, or is there some doubt?
Well, tonight, we're going to sort it all out,
For, tonight, it's 'The Meaning of Life'.
Posted by: burple | Jul 7, 2012 10:58:15 AM
There was a young man who said "God
Must find it exceedingly odd
To think that the tree
Should continue to be
When there's no one about in the quad."
"Dear Sir: Your astonishment's odd;
I am always about in the quad.
And that's why the tree
Will continue to be
Since observed by, Yours faithfully, God."
- God in the Quad by Ronald Knox
Posted by: Raza | Jul 7, 2012 12:34:50 PM
I was wondering why we would torture ourselves with trying to answer Leibniz's question, "Why is there something rather than nothing?" Other than faith, which by definition is not an answer, there is no answer to the question. Perhaps it's better to say that it is an unanswerable question.
Then I read Steven Weinberg and I am brought back to earth. Not only are such questions unanswerable, but the more we learn about the Cosmos the more pointless it seems. So I think it's important to think about this issue if only to understand that we will never have an answer.
If I may restate Weinberg's view, I would ask and answer the following question. So, what's the point? There is none, except that which you can give to it.
Posted by: Norman Costa | Jul 7, 2012 1:02:02 PM
Norman—
I was thinking along the same lines:
http://jimculleny.wordpress.com/why-does-the-world-exisit/
Posted by: Jim | Jul 8, 2012 9:39:05 AM
Norman: And yours truly makes three. That being, I believe, a quorum for the purposes of the present discussion, I move that we declare the question settled and adjourn the present meeting sine die.
Oh, sorry -- were there any other comments from the floor?
Posted by: JonJ | Jul 8, 2012 2:09:08 PM
@ Jim,
What's the Point?
"...our desperate
undoing of the void that would have been
in the alternative
forever unknown to anyone
making the original question
moot"
Good point!
Posted by: Norman Costa | Jul 8, 2012 11:45:17 PM
Time itself cannot be defined without a universe where events take place and the interval between events can be measured. It follows that the universe and time coexist or that the universe has always existed. It follows that there was no prior event or a cause for the universe to exist. Therefore to ask why the universe exists is a meaning less question since there can be no answer.
Any fallacy in the above reasoning?
Posted by: Raza | Jul 9, 2012 3:52:22 PM
@ Raza,
Couldn't have said it better, myself.
Posted by: Norman Costa | Jul 9, 2012 6:36:20 PM
Probability
There is only one absolute nothing
There can be/are an infinity of somethings
The odds are that there is something rather than nothing
Posted by: epistememe | Jul 9, 2012 9:19:50 PM
@epistememe: A most convincing and mathematical proof that the Universe has always existed and the probability of "Nothing" is zero.
Posted by: Raza | Jul 10, 2012 11:02:47 AM
Post a comment