July 08, 2012
The New Elitists
Shamus Rahman Khan in the New York Times:
You can tell a lot about people by looking at their music collections. Some have narrow tastes, mostly owning single genres like rap or heavy metal. Others are far more eclectic, their collections filled with hip-hop and jazz, country and classical, blues and rock. We often think of such differences as a matter of individual choice and expression. But to a great degree, they are explained by social background. Poorer people are likely to have singular or “limited” tastes. The rich have the most expansive.
We see a similar pattern in other kinds of consumption. Think of the restaurants cherished by very wealthy New Yorkers. Masa, where a meal for two can cost $1,500, is on the list, but so is a cheap Sichuan spot in Queens, a Papaya Dog and a favorite place for a slice. Sociologists have a name for this. Today’s elites are not “highbrow snobs.” They are “cultural omnivores.”
Omnivorousness is part of a much broader trend in the behavior of our elite, one that embraces diversity. Barriers that were once a mainstay of elite cultural and educational institutions have been demolished. Gone are the quotas that kept Jews out of elite high schools and colleges; inclusion is now the norm. Diverse and populist programming is a mainstay of every museum. Elites seem more likely to confront snobbish exclusion than they are to embrace it.
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 01:46 PM | Permalink






















Comments
That opening paragraph is simplistic. Exposure to diversity in childhood is more important than economic status in the development of preferences in food, music, social companions, reading choices... Poverty may limit that exposure, perhaps, but being open to new expression and experience is a learned thing.
Posted by: Storm | Jul 9, 2012 5:48:31 PM
It's true that there are many factors but in my experience at least wealth is a big one. And the eclecticism of the wealthy and educated seems to have a particular character, more ostentatious, more self-conscious and perhaps more arbitrary -- more removed from the social and environmental settings where the cultures actually come from.
Posted by: Arthur | Jul 9, 2012 6:30:32 PM
Post a comment