| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Does America Still Matter? Zbigniew Brzezinski’s ‘Strategic Vision’ | Main | The New Elitists »

July 08, 2012

The everyday denial of climate change

Kari Marie Norgaard in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists:

Global-warmingFor nearly three decades, natural and physical scientists have provided increasingly clear and dire assessments of the alteration in the biophysical world. Yet despite these urgent warnings, human social and political response to ecological degradation remains wholly inadequate. While apathy in the United States is particularly notable, this gap between the severity of the problem and its lack of public salience is visible in most Western nations. As scientific evidence for climate change pours in, public urgency and even interest in the issue fails to correspond. What can explain the mismatch between scientific information and public concern? Are people just uninformed? Are they inherently greedy and selfish? These are the questions that chart the course of my work, which concerns not the outright rejection of science by climate skeptics, but the more pervasive and common problem of how and why most people who say they are concerned about climate change nevertheless manage to ignore it.

More here.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 09:45 AM | Permalink

Comments

Some of the climate catastrophes of late may be changing the public perception that GW is a far-off in the future concern.

Posted by: Dredd | Jul 8, 2012 12:02:26 PM

Part of the problem may lie in the dire nature of the warnings themselves. When faced with such catastrophic visions of the future, people tend to throw their hands up in the air and do nothing. We're not talking about cleaning up the local park here after all. Therefore, discussions of global warming need to be more constructive, more realistic, and less hectoring.

Posted by: Al | Jul 8, 2012 12:16:19 PM

I don't see where the average person had a say in the nuclear armaments discussion.

That particular problem seemed to have been on its way towards solution until the current developments in Iran and North Korea. Hopefully these are just speed bumps along the way toward true nuclear non-proliferation.

I don't see where the average person will have much to say with regard to the climate change issue.

If there is such a thing as peak oil, then over time the price of fuel will escalate. This will get people to economize on their fuel usage and have an overall dampening effect on production and consumption.

Some islands and coastlines might get submerged in the interim. Those folks will have to move. Some species might go extinct, but if we keep enough DNA around we may be able to regrow them in the lab in the future when the climate turns around.

Meanwhile people are still dying in senseless wars, suffering as refugees or minority populations within oppressive countries, and desperately trying to find work during a worldwide economic crisis brought on by the people we supposedly elected to maintain our security.

If we create some sort of carbon trading scheme it will most certainly be turned into an economy-busting haven for speculators.

If we tack on energy taxes it will dampen an already weak economy and siphon away more money to be wastefully spent on boondoggle "green" projects by bought-and-paid for politicians and their lobbyist johns.

The market is not a perfect thing, but the alternatives that have been proposed so far reek of insider trading and cronyism of the worst kind.

Posted by: DAS | Jul 9, 2012 1:56:51 AM

Not some species will go extinct, but a large fraction, unprecedented since the demise of the dinosaurs. And it's impossible to "regrow" a species with its DNA only.

The situation is more dire than most people realize.

Posted by: Klausi | Jul 9, 2012 5:13:39 AM

Klausi,

Yes, we are in "The Sixth Mass Extinction", as scientists call it.

We have been losing about 200 species a day for a long time now.

The future of catastrophe arrived some years ago.

Posted by: Dredd | Jul 9, 2012 10:18:47 AM

@DAS - "The market is not a perfect thing, but the alternatives that have been proposed so far reek of insider trading and cronyism of the worst kind."

Why do you believe the status quo is better?

One of the largest roadblocks we face is the belief that doing nothing, is somehow less risky than doing something, and the way things have been done in the past, is always better than any changes that may be made. It is a massive assumption, that I find hard to understand.

Posted by: addicted | Jul 10, 2012 9:24:40 AM

al-I'd like to think we're adult enough to handle the truth as it is without softening it up.

Posted by: Ray Butlers | Jul 15, 2012 4:17:34 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Raza Husain on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

Raza Husain on Think About Nature

Raza Husain on Getting Smarter

johnnyred on Getting Smarter

Lou on Throwing away ancient wisdom, painting with sound and staying awake: a conversation with radio dramatist and ZBS Foundation president Thomas Lopez

Sundar on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

flowers rainbows on Lift up your voices: The century-long battle for women's freedom

mr.ed on wagner in new york?

mirel on Here’s how to change the world

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

X on Getting Smarter

Ross Williams on Getting Smarter

oroboe on Lennon's "Imagine" and McCartney/Wings' "Band on the Run" overlaid: One way of reuniting (some of) the Beatles

Richard H. Randall on Obama must Make Fighting Climate Change National Project, or Die the death of a thousand Scandals

seth edenbaum on The First New Atheist? Kierkegaard

waqnis on Mortify Our Wolves

nogodrod on KFC smugglers bring buckets of chicken through Gaza tunnels

waqnis on Here’s how to change the world

Fernando on Mortify Our Wolves

seth edenbaum on The case against empathy

Dredd on Mortify Our Wolves

Max on Here’s how to change the world

Rohana on Mortify Our Wolves

Raza Husain on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed