July 17, 2012
Romney is not merely a fatuous, unoriginal hack of a politician, but also a genuinely repugnant human being
Matt Taibbi in Rolling Stone:
Wow. If you live long enough, you’ll see some truly gross things in politics, but Mitt Romney’s work this past week "courting black support" was enough to turn even the strongest stomach.
Romney really showed us something in his luridly self-congratulating N.A.A.C.P. gambit, followed by the awesomely disgusting "free stuff" post-mortem speech he delivered the next night in front of friendlier audiences. The twin appearances revealed the candidate to be not merely unlikable, and not merely a fatuous, unoriginal hack of a politician, but also a genuinely repugnant human being, a grasping corporate hypocrite with so little feel for how to get along with people that he has to dream up elaborate schemes just to try to pander to the mob.
At first, it was hard to say what exactly Romney was thinking when he decided to address the N.A.A.C.P. He plunged into the speech with a creepy kamikaze smile and a rushed, weird (even for him) delivery, acting like someone proud of what a ballsily moronic dare he was attempting – like a high school kid mooning a squad car from the back of a school bus, or Peter McNeeley rushing face-first into the ring with Mike Tyson.
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 06:19 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Rolling Stone? That's usually a reliable and balanced source of political news...
Posted by: The Clock | Jul 17, 2012 6:06:26 PM
I agree this level of pitbull partisanship diminishes the credibility of Matt's work exposing the big banks. Maybe the only writing style he is capable of?
Posted by: Carlos | Jul 18, 2012 6:03:33 AM
Matt is right to be concerned about Mitt’s clear intention to support banks and corporations (his class) and undermine health, education, welfare, the environment, etc (everyone else’s concern). It is a shameless unapologetic class war and requires strong, frank, emotional verbiage. Mitt is not of the people or for the people and explicitly promises not govern as if he were. You have to wonder, if he doesn’t believe in government why is he so keen to be president? A lot of American suffering is due to the impersonal effect of banks and corporations and Mitt is all for that. We aught to let people who care about people govern. Mitt’s a robot. Vote human.
Posted by: Christopher Holvenstot | Jul 18, 2012 6:46:52 AM
I don't think it's the only style Taibbi is able to write -- I think he's a very capable writer. It's just that he loves to denounce whatever or whomever is denounceable by using the strongest language, and I would certainly agree with him that the Mittster is eminently execrable. I'm not sure that he would be even a worse president than Tricky Dick or W, but it's quite possible.
Posted by: JonJ | Jul 18, 2012 6:45:59 PM
They are all the same.
Posted by: Raza | Jul 18, 2012 10:22:03 PM
I think Taibbi is very even handed:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/obama-and-jobs-why-i-dont-believe-him-anymore-20110906
Posted by: Louise Gordon | Jul 19, 2012 12:00:03 AM
Well, it's a rather understated article -- too nice, if you ask me. Only Lenny Bruce had the words...
Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jul 19, 2012 12:25:48 AM
Post a comment