| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Physics heavies, including Peter Higgs, invited to CERN press conference on Wednesday, leading to widespread excitement that the Higgs Boson has been definitively discovered | Main | Keep your hands off my Medicare! »

July 02, 2012

Obama Is Corrupt, Hillary Isn't

by Evert Cilliers aka Adam Ash

Barack-Obama-Hillary-Clinton_0I heard an amazing story about Hillary Clinton from someone who worked for her. When she was a Senator, and some corporation gave her big campaign money, she wouldn't take the money if she knew she was going to vote against that corporation's interests on a bill that corporation wanted passed. She would tell them straight that she was going to vote against them, and then ask them if they still wanted her to cash their check, because she'd rather not have their money (this guy told me that weirdly enough, 90% of the corporations would tell her, heck, keep the money).

So this is a story about something very unique: an American politician who refuses to be bought.

One wonders if, under a Hillary presidency, with a Hillary Department of Justice ... if Wall Street, Jon Corzine, and all the other financial crooks would be walking around free today.

Obama has been totally bought by Wall Street. Not a single CEO from any of the big banks has been in trouble with the law, after the biggest financial meltdown and scandal of our times. Wall Street sold stuff they knew was crap to pension funds and other customers, and even bet against the stuff they sold. This is big-time fraud, to sell stuff you know will blow up, but you don't care, because the stuff will blow up after you've collected your bonus. Too big to fail turns out to be too big to jail. Not a single hand of justice has been laid on them. And no laws have been made to force them to be honest and transparent. Tim Geithner and the SEC are giving Wall Street crooks a free pass. Jon Corzine openly stole a billion bucks from his customer accounts to cover his bad margins, and he is walking free.

Would Hillary have let Wall Street off scot-free? Who knows. But at least now I know she was willing to refuse money from corporations whom she was going to vote against. She was not for sale when she was a Senator. But Obama as president was and is for sale. He sold out to Wall Street when he became president, because his candidacy was backed big-time by Wall Street money.

That's why I'm hoping Hillary runs again after Obama finishes his second term. I'm hoping she runs with Elizabeth Warren as her veep on an all-women ticket. That would set up Warren for the presidency after a Hillary presidency. One thing you can be sure as heck about: under a Warren presidency, Wall Street would be forced to get in line.

Warren would prosecute where Obama is too much a of 100%-bought toady to do a thing about Wall Street fraud. 

There was more prosecution of corporate fraud under George W. Bush than there is under Barack Obama. During the Savings and Loans scandal in Reagan's time, Bill Black prosecuted thousands of fraudsters. This is an unbelievable irony: Republican presidencies saw more prosecution for Wall Street malfeasance than this Democratic presidency. Our plutocracy can lie, steal and gut our economy with no accountability at all. This is the biggest scandal of the Obama presidency. 

Once upon a time there was a Democratic president with guts. He said this about our economic overlords:

"Out of this modern civilization, economic royalists carved new dynasties. New kingdoms were built upon the concentration of control over material things. Through new uses of corporations, banks, and securities, new machinery of industry and agriculture, of labor and capital -- all undreamed by the fathers -- the whole structure of modern life was impressed into this royal service.

"There was no place among this royalty for our many thousands of small business men and merchants who sought to make worthy use of the American system of initiative and profit. They were no more free than the worker or the farmer. Even the honest and progressive-minded men of wealth, aware of their obligation to their generation, could never know just where they fitted into this dynastic scheme of things.

"It was natural and perhaps human that the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for the control of the Government itself. They created a new despotism and wrapped it in the robes of legal sanction. In its service, new mercenaries sought to regiment the people, their labor, and their property. And as a result, the average man once more confronts the problem faced by the Minute Man….

"Against economic tyranny such as this, the American citizen could appeal only to the organized power of the Government…

"The royalists of the economic order have conceded that political freedom was the business of the Government, but they have maintained that economic slavery was nobody’s business. They granted that the Government could protect the citizen in his right to vote, but they denied that the Government could do anything to protect the citizen in his right to work and his right to live….

"The economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What they really complain about is that we seek to take away their power. Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of power."

Elizabeth warren

The Democratic president who said this was FDR. Would that his like comes among us again.Who is there who would call it like it is today? What happened under FR has happened again, and his words are as true about our time as they were of his time. I think the closest thing we have to him today is Elizabeth Warren. If Hillary doesn't run in 2016, Warren should.

And then you should vote for her if you want Wall Street off your back and in jail.

Here's what a friend emailed me last week in our mutual despair:

"The reality of how corrupt the financial system has become -- from the too big to fail institutions on Wall Street -- to the rich rednecks and their private equity funds -- is as depressing as watching them tighten their publicly-financed grip on a broken political system.

"And as the Occupy Wall Street failure has demonstrated, we've reached a point where change is impossible. The foxes don't just run the hen house, they own it. Corporate/political corruption has become the ethos Harvard grads aspire to. You'd think lying, stealing and proudly figuring out new ways to take advantage of people is the most popular business school curriculum.

"Product_thumbnail.phpSeriously, how do you eliminate corruption from a system when the criminals are in charge of the reform?"

We can only do it if we give incorruptible politicians an opportunity to take over the hen house. Incorruptible politicians like Hillary Clinton. Like Elizabeth Warren.

Please bear this in mind in 2016, when we may have our last chance to put an incorruptible president in charge of our corrupted system.

 

(Afternote: I have a book out, self-published at the moment, based on my many provocative posts to 3QD. It's called The Real Obama: Progressive Tiger or Wall Street Poodle? You'll never have more fun reading about politics. Only $12 -- order a copy here: lulu.com/product/paperback/the-real-obama-progressive-tiger-or-wall-street-poodle/18939747)

 

Posted by Evert Cilliers at 12:05 AM | Permalink

Comments

"Let's try to get our ducks in a row to force Wall Street back in line after 2016?"
I'd almost call it inspired.

Posted by: Foppe | Jul 2, 2012 4:55:20 AM

Yes, worst ballot of my life was cast for Obama's "Hope You Can Believe In."

What we really need is a viable third party, which is why I will vote Libertarian this November. Governor Gary Johnson of New Mexico will be on the ballot in all 50 states. The Libertarians need to show 15% support in order to be included in debates.

With a third party participating, the good-cop/bad-cop game that the two party system has been playing will no longer work.

~eric.

Posted by: Eric Chaffee | Jul 2, 2012 5:27:30 AM

This has gotta be satire, right? I'd expect something this idiotic on a progressive political blog, but I thought 3QD held a higher standard.

Posted by: ? | Jul 2, 2012 7:24:17 AM

Your story is hilarious to read!

Google: Dubai Ports World Clinton

Willy is taking the money you fool.

Posted by: krakow | Jul 2, 2012 8:09:48 AM

"So this is a story about something very unique: an American politician who refuses to be bought."

And yet, I remember seeing a network news broadcast of her giving a speech, where she said, and I quote precisely: "I know all about how to run a White House coverup."

It is also instructive how quickly that disappeared down the memory hole. Try and find it, I dare you.

So please, keep looking for a politician that is not corrupt.

Posted by: Carlos | Jul 2, 2012 9:58:56 AM

Evert, you are back! And this time, not with satire but with sci-fi.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jul 2, 2012 10:06:37 AM

I heard an amazing story about Hillary Clinton from someone who worked for her.

Wow, some blowhard on the internet claims to have heard a story about Hilary Clinton from some guy he knew. I, for one, am immediately convinced that his opinion of Clinton must be right. If this is the sort of trustworthy argument I can find in your book, then I am immediately going to order a dozen copies to distribute to family and friends!

Posted by: Joe | Jul 2, 2012 12:00:38 PM

I worked for Hillary, and she always was who work the most and she was very kind with her staff, loyal and very honest.She's a very good person and very honest.HILLARY 2012!

Posted by: Laura | Jul 2, 2012 12:04:27 PM

Hillary Clinton is as corporatist (and war-mongering) as they come. She served six years on the Wal*Mart board of directors, never once bucking their anti-union actions, and represented them at the Rose Law Firm. Her husband backed the WTO and signed the 1996 Telecom Act and NAFTA into law. The former delivered our entire mass media system into the hands of the largest of megacorporations and the latter subjected sovereign states to the whims of transnational corporations.

The Clintons sent their daughter Chelsea to Stanford -- so that she could pursue lucrative employment as a hedge fund manager. Though Chelsea eventually went on to other pursuits, her husband continues as a hedge fund manager. Throughout the 2008 election, Hillary showed the country how dishonest she could be, shocking some of us. For the past 3.5 years, Hillary has done well serving the Obama administration in a non-political job, but we have no proof whatsoever that she has changed her stripes.

Now with Elizabeth Warren, you do indeed have an uncorrupted politician. Despite the fact that Hillary has changed her look to a more Warren-like naturalness, do not confuse the two. They are as different as day and night. Total opposites.

Posted by: Susan | Jul 2, 2012 12:27:06 PM

And yet, I remember seeing a network news broadcast of her giving a speech, where she said, and I quote precisely: "I know all about how to run a White House coverup."

It is also instructive how quickly that disappeared down the memory hole. Try and find it, I dare you.

That would be a "memory hole" worthy of the Men in Black, given that googling shows no one else with access to the internet has posted that precise quote online, except a single commenter on a politico story here (maybe that was you too?) I don't suppose you'd consider the alternate explanation that human memory is very fallible and subject to being rewritten to fit with a person's preferred narratives...

Posted by: Jesse M. | Jul 2, 2012 1:01:16 PM

While it's amusing to contend that HRC is not corrupt, and Evert is funny enough to milk it dry, it should be a dinner party turn among law students who know their future jobs depend on their ability to make a serious case for absolutely any point of view, not a subject for other kinds of attention. Whatever my quarrels with the president, he'll get my vote again. It sometimes occurs to me wrt a few issues that he's been sold, but that's better than being bought. If you want to see what a bought politician looks like to a search engine, key in "Hillary Clinton" + Monsanto -- but only if your computer is feeling very, very strong.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jul 2, 2012 2:06:31 PM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-smith/youre-appointing-who-plea_b_243810.html

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Jul 2, 2012 3:18:06 PM

Like other people, I read the news, and am aware Monsanto is nicely represented in the Obama administration in the form of Tom Vilsack and Michael Taylor. Monsanto walked in through the front door at Whole Foods, too. Are we not talking about _personal_ corruption, as opposed to bad ideas? There are trade-offs that really should not have been made, and then there's being bought. It's very puzzling, too, that Michelle Obama should be an activist on behalf of healthy food for kids, yet remotely comfy with the notion that GM foods have a place in that scheme -- but does anyone think she has been paid off to sing that song? Last I looked, you could be wrong, gravely wrong, yet not corrupt.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jul 2, 2012 3:34:40 PM

"I don't suppose you'd consider the alternate explanation that human memory is very fallible and subject to being rewritten to fit with a person's preferred narratives..."

I can't rule that out, Jesse.

Here is the closest version of the (sanitized?) quote:

"I know a little bit about how White Houses work. I know somebody picked up a phone, somebody got on a computer, somebody sent an e-mail, somebody called for a meeting, somebody in that White House probably under instructions from somebody further up the chain told the E.P.A.: `Don’t tell the people of New York the truth.’ And I want to know who that is."

http://www.democracynow.org/2003/8/28/sen_clinton_rep_nadler_call_for

I agree it is possible that I translated that tacit admission into something more explicit, but it wasn’t a single hearing. I was so shocked at what she said that I googled the event and watched the video several times. In my head I hear her saying the words I claimed. What is certain is that the event occurred, and that there is now, apparently, no video available.

Posted by: Carlos | Jul 2, 2012 5:21:22 PM

Evert: Pork belly futures!

Posted by: Erich | Jul 2, 2012 10:48:42 PM

Ah. What a disappointment.

Have you let your anger at Obama cloud your judgement, or have you become one of those comfortable liberals. I too voted for Obama and I assure you I'm angry and disappointed In him. But then I was not personally stung by involvement, campaigning for his election.

As for Hillary, how is one person's statement about one incident proof she is not corrupted? Did you happen to consider she may have already committed to the other side of the issue in exchange for support in another matter? And did any other questions come to mind?

This is not South Africa. It is far more complex in its diversity and its political system.

This election will not bring the change we want, nor will the next election or the next, no matter who is in the running. Hope and party identity are conjoined twins, they are enemies of change. Change will only come through direct action, we need civil disobediance to raise the level tension, we need to build a mass movement in the country because it is the system that's the problem. It is the only way possible way to have an effect on Washington.

We cannot break the paralysis of a two-party system within the party system. It can't be done within the electoral system.

You are dead wrong in saying the Occupy Movement is dead. It is not as visible as it was but it is very much alive.

But if you must rely on hope, you might want to hope I'm right. And if you do hope I'm right, you might want to add soon to the equation.

Posted by: Barbara | Jul 3, 2012 6:21:57 AM

Elatia: Enjoy voting...

Posted by: Foppe | Jul 3, 2012 6:56:54 AM

Foppe, you and a few other people around here really do believe, I guess, that since the president is not an answer to a prayer, he's evil trash. There's no real dialogue with you because you are no longer thinking, you are riding a hobbyhorse. And you are not alone! I hope you will bear in mind that, while many horrible things -- as Barbara says above -- will not be made right by a Democrat victory in the coming election, the next president will almost certainly appoint three Supreme Court Justices. That's one place it will make a big difference if the president is Mitt Romney.

I hope you will carry on without making a point of showing contempt for others, or acting on the assumption they are not well informed and need to learn of Glenn Greenwald's existence. Oy.

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Jul 3, 2012 11:59:08 AM

Trying to figure out if this is a joke or not. WTF is this doing on 3QD? Someone heard something about how Hillary is Teh Awesome and Obama is a crook?

Seriously, 3QD, what is this???

Posted by: bupalos | Jul 3, 2012 12:27:28 PM

The difference a Dem makes:

http://www.counterpunch.org/2010/05/19/elena-kagan-and-monsanto/

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Jul 3, 2012 1:21:21 PM

Good points Louise and Foppe. If we are so sure "our" side is going to do the right thing, we'll swallow our own bile and put Obama back to do ...what! Did he really proclaim he had the right to kill anyone he wanted?! Did he really proclaim anyone killed by a US missile deserved it?! Did he really put a Monsanto lackey on the Supreme Court AND in the FDA?

And he must be supported because he is the Democrat?

The war really is over. Enjoy your vote. In the future, the revolution will be a travesty.

Posted by: Carlos | Jul 3, 2012 1:50:19 PM

"What is certain is that the event occurred, and that there is now, apparently, no video available."

Where did you look for the video? I googled the quote and found this wall street journal story which mentioned the story came from ny1.com, and I found the video on their site:

http://www.ny1.com/content/32701/sen--clinton-on-wtc-air---they-didn-t-tell-us-the-truth--

Posted by: Jesse M. | Jul 3, 2012 3:51:04 PM

Two words: "Lanny Davis" ... make this whole post a joke...

Clinton's leading spokesman and defender in 2008 ... Bag man for African dictators... thoroughly corrupt ... whoever wrote this post is a satirist or a moron

http://campusprogress.org/articles/the_fixer_lanny_davis_represents_union_busters_dictators_and_now_for-p/

Posted by: ceekay | Jul 4, 2012 1:06:41 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

FortisMedicalTourism on Cardiac surgery is not so bad

Pacificklaus on NORTH KOREA’S NERVE WAR

Félix E. F. Larocca, MD on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Diego Del Gastor on SNL's Ben Affleck Episode: 5 Best Scenes

Shane on That's not music – that's just noise!

seth edenbaum on Habermas, Adorno, Politics

Raza Husain on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

Raza Husain on Think About Nature

Raza Husain on Getting Smarter

johnnyred on Getting Smarter

Lou on Throwing away ancient wisdom, painting with sound and staying awake: a conversation with radio dramatist and ZBS Foundation president Thomas Lopez

Sundar on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

flowers rainbows on Lift up your voices: The century-long battle for women's freedom

mr.ed on wagner in new york?

mirel on Here’s how to change the world

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

X on Getting Smarter

Ross Williams on Getting Smarter

oroboe on Lennon's "Imagine" and McCartney/Wings' "Band on the Run" overlaid: One way of reuniting (some of) the Beatles

Richard H. Randall on Obama must Make Fighting Climate Change National Project, or Die the death of a thousand Scandals

waqnis on Thursday Poem

seth edenbaum on The First New Atheist? Kierkegaard

waqnis on Mortify Our Wolves

nogodrod on KFC smugglers bring buckets of chicken through Gaza tunnels

waqnis on Here’s how to change the world

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed