July 27, 2012
Drone Court Advantage
An incisive piece by Charles Davis in The New Inquiry:
Tritely declaring President Obama no different from George W. Bush, these nominally left-wing suppressors of the vote even adopt the same bigoted, “pro-life” language one would expect to find outside an abortion clinic in Kansas, proclaiming our commander-in-chief a “criminal” and “baby killer” all because he has killed a few regrettable babies as part of wars that much of the world considers criminal — a privilege, mind you, never denied any of his white predecessors. They even attack the president because he has had the temerity to protect the lives of American servicemen and women through the record-breaking use of drones, ensuring the greatest threat they face is carpal tunnel, not a bullet from an angry savage.
...Talking about innocent men, women, and children killed by our way of life isn’t going to bring them back, but it will undermine support among President Obama’s left-wing base. Indeed, while some pacifists confuse their personal beliefs with politically viable policy solutions — thinking, as blogger Adam Serwer puts it, that America should stick to “using banana creme pies or wifflebats in its defense” — President Obama is compelled to live in the real world. And there he must confront real threats, like a potential GOP takeover of the Senate, that require an active and politically unassailable foreign policy. Instead of dwelling on dead foreigners and arguing and bickering over which president killed which child, the left would do well to remember the huge advances in progressive rhetoric we’ve made these last four years. Instead of bashing the man who saved us from Sarah Palin, we ought to rededicating ourselves to addressing the most pressing problem the planet faces right now: defeating Mitt Romney.
After all, if you don’t like that Barack Obama possesses the unilateral ability to decide who lives or dies, imagine how insufferable that power would be in the hands of the former Massachusetts governor.
Read the rest here.
Posted by Zujaja Tauqeer at 07:00 AM | Permalink






















Comments
I'll accept the point about Romney being a worse choice than Obama, but I think the whole dismissive thing about innocents being killed (because they aren't in the US) reveals a person who is not nearly as decent as he imagines himself to be.
Posted by: Andrew C | Jul 27, 2012 8:17:53 AM
So we shouldn't critique Obama because it might hurt his chances of re-election? Yes, he's the lesser of two evils, but let's at least try to keep him that way.
Also, the dismissive way the author refers to non-Americans in the piece ("some impoverished stay-at-home Buzkashi mom," "some willfully oppressed third-worlder in a burka") is really disgusting, as is the casual sexism of some of the pejoratives he chooses ("effeminate anti-Obama purists," "emo-left" -- i.e., don't be all gross and "emotional" like a "woman." Well, better that than a mindless Obama cheerleader who is blind to some of his very real flaws.)
Posted by: anon | Jul 27, 2012 9:47:45 AM
Whoa! I agree with anon. I think we can do without this bigoted language here. The thesis is of interest, but must you re-publish such garbage?
"a bullet from an angry savage"
Hardly an incisive piece. More like a neo-colonialist rant. Badly done.
Posted by: Ray Butlers | Jul 27, 2012 10:13:04 AM
My god folks , it's satire !! ( or at least I'm presuming it is)
Posted by: Ciaran | Jul 27, 2012 10:24:26 AM
As a self-proclaimed progressive who finds himself defending Obama against attacks from fellow leftist, this article made me cringe.
Also, I can't tell if the first three commenters are trolling or if the satire really went over their heads. Do they not teach A Modest Proposal anymore in high school English?
Posted by: SRM | Jul 27, 2012 12:13:18 PM
It's satire, folks! The idea is to take the usual moderate-left position of "how dare you complain about Obama? You want Romney to win!" line and exaggerate it. I find the piece unconvincing, overall, however: the satire is so subtle that it's easy to miss if you don't read the whole thing, and I don't think it makes the left-wing anti-Obama case very forcefully, devolving instead into a satire of the media's representation of wars in the Middle East.
Posted by: Robert Rushing | Jul 27, 2012 12:55:46 PM
This isn't satire. It's trash. There is absolutely nothing in this piece that would indicate to me that the author is trying to write satire. It seems to me that when someone accidentally reveals how ugly they are they fallback, like the cowards they are, on it all just being a joke. No, it isn't. It's not a joke. This is what the author really thinks. Turning around and saying, Hey, I was just joking, is chickenshit. Own up to your prejudices. Own up to your hatred of the other. Pick a fucking side and stay there.
Posted by: CV | Jul 27, 2012 1:47:25 PM
The lesser of two evils is still evil and one is only projected here.
Moreover, the Left-prog opposition to this evil is also diminished for fear of alienating minority votes.
In this regard a Romney victory could even be projected to unleash the left
and the progs on the streets.
The most important point to make however, is the Elite of both parties have been captured by the banksters, the m-i-complex and The Lobby.
It is foolish to believe either party is reformable.
We need a multiparty system and if it be objected this would throw the whole "system" into even more turmoil, ask the mass of Iraqis and Afghanis and Pakis and Yemenis if they care or would have cared.
Posted by: K. Hoop | Jul 27, 2012 2:02:20 PM
If you don't want people talking about all of his war crimes get him to stop committing them. Have to call BS on the race thing as I was calling out his white predecessor on his murdering habits as well.
Posted by: James Decker | Jul 27, 2012 3:54:37 PM
Democrats are more bloody-minded than Republicans when it comes to warring in distant lands:
Also, a book on the Savage Mules.
Posted by: slr | Jul 27, 2012 5:18:45 PM
"There is absolutely nothing in this piece that would indicate to me that the author is trying to write satire."
"I find the piece unconvincing, overall, however: the satire is so subtle that it's easy to miss if you don't read the whole thing"
Posted by: PWirth | Jul 27, 2012 6:31:48 PM
Link should have led here.
Posted by: PWirth | Jul 27, 2012 6:38:18 PM
Wow, how can you not understand this essay?
Some of the comments on this piece are clearly written by people either A: Too lazy to read the whole essay, but comment on it anyway (immoral)
B: Incredibly stupid, but comment on the essay anyway (troubling, especially at 3QD)
C: Perhaps don't read English as a first (or second, or third) language?
Reread the last paragraph of the essay and have the decency to apologize if you are in Category A. Category B. . .I am sorry for you. Category C: ask for help with your reading comprehension from a native speaker.
Posted by: DrunktankDan | Jul 27, 2012 6:41:36 PM
Seriously. . .if you guys are trolls, well then bravo. Otherwise you are either insane, lazy, or unintelligent. How could anybody take this seriously?
Reread the last paragraph!
I'll admit it starts a little slow, had me fooled for a paragraph or maybe two before I realized what I was reading. Someone called the author chickenshit? Are you nuts?! I think what he wrote was pretty ballsy. . .calling out all of Obama's so called liberal supporters etc. by making them seem utterly ridiculous. Have the decency to realize you f'd up.
Posted by: DrunktankDan | Jul 27, 2012 6:47:26 PM
HAHAHAHA!!! I can't stop laughing at this thread. . .Some of these comments are the funniest shit on the internet. I gotta get a screen grab before it gets taken down.
CV wins the gold for self righteous, presumptuous, and hypersensitive idiot, followed closely by anon and maybe Ray? I can't wait to see if any of you have the integrity to admit you are a dumbass and take the long trek down from that high horse. Even my beloved 3QD gets infected with 'internet commenter obtunded mentation' from time to time I suppose. Somebody back me up here! These comments are awesomely hilarious. OK. . I'll stop picking on you guys. I have had my laugh. *Wipes tears from eyes*
Posted by: DrunktankDan | Jul 27, 2012 7:07:51 PM
Oh, just some thoughts converted to electrons . . . to be required to read through all of this so as to arrive at the last paragraph in order to "get" something hugely relevant — or why would we read it to begin with? 'Cause we have lots of time to waste on drivel? — seems a lot to ask.
Stylistically aberrant, but not in a GOOD way, I offer. But it certainly has generated pungent comments!
Posted by: Chris Gudmann | Jul 28, 2012 12:26:38 AM
OK, first comment, fair enough I was mistaken. The people who pointed out the error and then capered like little boys with their dix out can get fkked well and truly.
Posted by: Andrew C | Jul 28, 2012 1:58:31 AM
It happens man we skim though too much stuff on the net. Im actually a subscriber to the new enquiry and the first time I saw the essay it took me a confusing few minutes before I copped it . I really think its very effective though
Posted by: Ciaran | Jul 29, 2012 5:33:01 AM
Post a comment