| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« How many Israelis ask themselves why they remain in a country that has become the most dangerous place for Jews? | Main | In Memoriam: Chris Marker »

July 31, 2012

College: What It Was, Is, and Should Be: Beyond the Ivy Islands

Steven Brint in the Los Angeles Review of Books:

1343512555It is odd to think that we live in a time when the college model may be in the process of breaking apart. So much suggests that college has never been more successful. Record numbers of students graduate every year. Every graduating class is more diverse than the one that preceded it. Foreign students flock to American quads. Harvard economists tell us that the college degree has never been worth more, relative to the high school degree, than it is today. Bill Gates and President Obama call for a doubling of the proportion of young adults with college degrees over the next decade. We seem to be heading for the day when we won’t have enough commencement speakers to go around.

And yet other indicators suggest that the college experience has never been more imperiled. Tuition has been increasing faster than inflation for more than 30 years. Some economists have begun to argue that college costs more than it is worth. Studies like Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa’s Academically Adrift suggest that the bottom third of students are not developing their analytical skills or thought processes in college, largely because not much is required of them. The fastest-growing parts of college budgets have nothing directly to do with teaching, but instead go to administrators and student affairs staff. In their efforts to shift enrollments to two-year community colleges, politicians like Louisiana’s Governor Bobby Jindal have stated flatly that “most future jobs [in America] will require more training than a high school diploma but less than the traditional 4-year college degree.” More radical still are plans to break up degree programs into distinct, definable skills and to award badges for successful acquisition of each skill. Even institutions like Harvard and Stanford are hedging their bets on the future of site-specific four-year baccalaureates by sponsoring ambitious online projects. 

More here.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 08:35 AM | Permalink

Comments

I believe the national sacred cow of the four-year college education is going to be the next socioeconomic/cultural shoe to drop in the great reordering of American priorities. We’re still at the point where you can’t ask this question in polite conversation, lest you be accused of wanting to deprive someone of the American Dream. The higher-ed industry will fight this kicking and screaming. They’ve got a nice little mass-hypnosis racket going, and such questions run the risk of messing it all up.

I think the first problem is defining ‘college’.

There is the local community college with its remedial reading and math classes (as in basic algebra.) It churns out expensive degrees in things like early childhood education (Daycare 101) that lead to jobs paying $8 an hour. It teaches its classes utilizing multiple choice and T/F exams; and the course difficulty is somewhere around 10th grade level. There is my undergrad school which is in the top ranks academically, does not teach remedial anything, and math classes start with integral calculus. All exams are 3 hour essay and the undergrad course difficulty is on par with most public university graduate schools.

Anyone who is breathing can enroll at the local community college. Less than 3% of all high school graduates are intellectually able and academically prepared to handle my undergrad school.

Except for a small number, most large state universities - particularly the state universities that are 3rd or 4th tier in college ranking (ie: so bad that they don’t even get a ranking number) - are only marginally better than the community college. The differences in quality is vast. Berkeley is 2nd to none in the quality of its education. Oakland University (rum-dum Michigan state college) is no better than the community college and its students pay a lot of money for nothing in terms of the value of their degree after graduation. There are also hundred upon hundreds of 3rd and 4th rate private colleges as well. They sucker the students in, take their money and the degrees they grant are not marketable in the real world.

So define ‘college.’

If the definition is that of my undergrad school and places like Berkeley, less than 5-10% of all students are qualified to attend college. If it includes 2nd tier schools - good but not outstanding - then 10-15% of students are qualified to attend college. The problem is that 4th rate schools whose academic difficulty is no more than high school are touted as ‘college.’

How we got to this point where our society believes that most people are suited to a baccalaureate program with any rigor I do not know. Traditionally and properly understood, a four-year college education teaches advanced analytic skills and information at a level that exceeds the intellectual capacity of MOST people. Most curriculums today don't even emphasize logical and analytical thinking... And to think that so many struggle really hard to pass already grade inflated core courses (!)

There is no magic point at which a genuine college-level education becomes an option, but anything below an IQ of 110 is problematic. If you want to do well, you should have an IQ of 115 or higher. Put another way, it makes sense for only about 15% of the population.

Also, we really have to reverse the caste system mentality which says that apprenticeships, technical or vocational training are things that the rabble performs and don’'t really require any kind of smarts.

Posted by: Mark | Jul 31, 2012 7:18:45 PM

Were not most of those involved in the recent housing and banking meltdown college graduates? Was not even Maddoff a college graduate in New York?
Consider the U.S. Congress. Are not most of them college graduates, yet they preside over a massive national debt of some $16 trillion or about $51,000 for every man, woman and child in the country?
Obviously something is very very wrong with "higher" education in America today.
I have old articles published in the 1940's criticizing the lowering of standards in college then; what do you think they would say of the situation today?
Most college graduates couldn't even put the spare tire on their car if they had a flat or change a faucet washer in their own bathroom. They have to "call an expert" to do this for them.'
However the one thing that college graduates have in common with non college graduates is they all know how to have fun in the bedroom and produce more idiots in their own image.

Posted by: W.J.Abbe | Jul 31, 2012 7:28:41 PM

Ivan Illich on deschooling:

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1971/jan/07/a-special-supplement-education-without-school-how-/?page=1

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Jul 31, 2012 8:17:27 PM

The problem is undoubtedly, in part, that shorter duration and/or inadequately resourced "college" is unlikely to do much developmentally. But the true scandals are that:

- on the one hand, the Ivies are providing an increasingly inane yardstick for fees, endowments and in some cases faculty salaries, which serve to distort overall expenditure; and

- while the best graduates of those elite schools are pretty good, the effects of grade inflation, declining standards at matriculation and, in many fields, an increasing divide between undergraduate teaching and faculty research mean that for most, the Ivies are really just credential mills. The level of competence now conferred by Harvard Law, just to pick on an example big enough to stand up for itself, is not in general much more than any other top 50 school: the branding is the difference.

The answer - and also the response to the charming use of IQ statistics and so forth above - is that:

- where there is a well functioning high school system, there should be increasing numbers of undergraduate students capable of undertaking rigorous study; and

- experience suggests that, in the long run, higher numbers of graduates will find their own utility; but

- this depends upon that undergraduate teaching being both accessible and demanding. Somehow - with a few distinguished exceptions - the once storied capacity of the United States university system to do both has been replaced with a pathological drive to do neither.

Posted by: max | Aug 1, 2012 7:35:03 AM

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1271

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Aug 1, 2012 2:49:04 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Rashid on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Yoann on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Dave Ranning on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

sadhana on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Carol Westbrook on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Ken Bryant on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Umer Vakil on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Kabir on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Nina on White Indians

Nina on White Indians

Dave Ranning on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

Mohammed Hassanali on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

musafir on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Maniza on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Ellen Perry on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

waqnis on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Norman Costa on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Hannah Carlton on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Joe on Digging Up Bones or, The Labyrinths beneath Our Feet

JonJ on The Beautiful German Language

cpfaff on Passionate About The Actor's Art: an interview with Michael Howard

Sumiran on Sunday Poem

Ethan on Getting Smarter

Pacificklaus on NORTH KOREA’S NERVE WAR

Félix E. F. Larocca, MD on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed