| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Wes Anderson: Whimsical Like a Fox | Main | coolness »

June 13, 2012

Why Smart People Are Stupid

Jonah Lehrer in The New Yorker:

Intelligence-StvensonHere’s a simple arithmetic question: A bat and ball cost a dollar and ten cents. The bat costs a dollar more than the ball. How much does the ball cost?

The vast majority of people respond quickly and confidently, insisting the ball costs ten cents. This answer is both obvious and wrong. (The correct answer is five cents for the ball and a dollar and five cents for the bat.)

For more than five decades, Daniel Kahneman, a Nobel Laureate and professor of psychology at Princeton, has been asking questions like this and analyzing our answers. His disarmingly simple experiments have profoundly changed the way we think about thinking. While philosophers, economists, and social scientists had assumed for centuries that human beings are rational agents—reason was our Promethean gift—Kahneman and his scientific partner, the late Amos Tversky, demonstrated that we’re not nearly as rational as we like to believe.

When people face an uncertain situation, they don’t carefully evaluate the information or look up relevant statistics. Instead, their decisions depend on a long list of mental shortcuts, which often lead them to make foolish decisions. These shortcuts aren’t a faster way of doing the math; they’re a way of skipping the math altogether. Asked about the bat and the ball, we forget our arithmetic lessons and instead default to the answer that requires the least mental effort.

More here.  And Tauriq Moosa adds some thoughts.

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 09:41 AM | Permalink

Comments

Is it just me, or is anyone else perpetually underwhelmed by the Kahneman & Tversky research? These findings have been all the academic rage for years, but to me they've never seemed that groundbreaking. Maybe they're only interesting if you begin with an assumption that humans are rational thinking robots.

Posted by: Eli | Jun 13, 2012 12:45:44 PM

This article comes as a great relief since it implies that stupid people, like me, are really smart.

Posted by: Olavi Valo | Jun 13, 2012 1:09:29 PM

Dear Eli, being underwhelmed by something you just read is hindsight bias.

Posted by: Kirk | Jun 13, 2012 1:31:28 PM

A great review of Lehrer's new book, and a powerful indictment of the pop-science writing that is currently undermining public confidence in science:


http://www.tnr.com/article/books-and-arts/magazine/103912/bob-dylan-jonah-lehrer-creativity

Posted by: Joe | Jun 13, 2012 1:54:32 PM

Some smart people are also biased and prejudiced; they may be called professors in the Academy. Here is a current scandal at UCLA:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/ucla-accused-of-firing-prof-for-criticizing-pollution-agenda/?cat_orig=education
“What’s academia’s response to a whistleblower who exposes fraudulent research and faked credentials on a panel of experts?
Fire the whistleblower, of course.
That’s the allegation in a new complaint filed against the regents of the University of California by the American Center for Law and Justice on behalf of former professor James E. Enstrom.”

“According to the ACLJ, Enstrom, a research professor in UCLA’s Department of Environmental Health Sciences, published peer-reviewed research showing that fine particulate matter does not kill Californians.
However, much of the “anti-pollution” research is based on the assumption that those fine particulates, like those that make up Denver’s infamous “Brown Cloud” during the winter, are injurious to all who breathe them.
Enstrom also assembled evidence that claimed powerful UC professors systematically exaggerated the adverse health effects of diesel particulate matter in California, “knowing full well that these exaggerations would be used by the California Air Resources Board to justify draconian diesel vehicle regulations.”
Further, a lead author of a report from the CARB didn’t earn a UC Davis Ph.D. as he claimed but had purchased a fake degree for $1,000, Enstrom documented.
“Finally, Dr. Enstrom discovered that several activist members of the CARB Scientific Review Panel on Toxic Air Contaminants have exceeded the legislatively mandated three-year term limits by decades,” ACLJ said.”
“Enstrom’s Ph.D. from Stanford is in physics. He’s worked in the university system for more than 30 years. His difficulties started after his peer-reviewed inhalation toxicology report titled “Fine Particulate Air Pollution and total Mortality Among Elderly Californians 1973-2002,” the claim explains.
That study “found no relationship between PM2.5 (particulate matter) and total mortality in California,” the lawsuit said.”

Posted by: WJAbbe | Jun 15, 2012 6:50:13 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

prasad on the culture animal

Mitt Romney's Dog on Why race as a biological construct matters

Elatia Harris on The Moral Status of Rocks

prasad on The Moral Status of Rocks

Raza Husain on The Moral Status of Rocks

Fred on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Tomboktu on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Joe on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Jalees Rehman on The Science Mystique

Dredd on The Moral Status of Rocks

sjg on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Ken Pidcock on The need for critical science journalism

Louise Gordon on Why race as a biological construct matters

Louise Gordon on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

musafir on a pretty funny book

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

Junaida on Tuesday Poem

rafiq on Tuesday Poem

Raza Husain on the culture animal

Nebor on Tuesday Poem

Eleutheria on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

carlos on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed