June 24, 2012
When Chomsky wept
Fred Branfman in Salon:
Forty-two years ago I had an unusual experience. I became friendly with a guy named Noam Chomsky. I came to know him as a human being before becoming fully aware of his fame and the impact of his work. I have often thought of this experience since — both because of the insights it gave me into him and, more important, the deep trouble in which our nation and world find themselves today. His foremost contribution for me has been his constant focus on how U.S. leaders treat so many of the world’s population as “unpeople,” either exploiting them economically or engaging in war-making, which has murdered, maimed or made homeless over 20 million people since the end of World War II (over 5 million in Iraq and 16 million in Indochina according to official U.S. government statistics).
Our friendship was forged over concern for some of these “unpeople” when he visited Laos in February 1970. I had been living in a Lao village outside the capital city of Vientiane for three years at that point and spoke Laotian. But five months earlier I had been shocked to my core when I interviewed the first Lao refugees brought down to Vientiane from the Plain of Jars in northern Laos, which had been controlled by the communist Pathet Lao since 1964. I had discovered to my horror that U.S. executive branch leaders had been clandestinely bombing these peaceful villagers for five-and-a-half years, driving tens of thousands underground and into caves, where they had been forced to live like animals.
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 06:08 PM | Permalink






















Comments
I posted this on my page weeks ago. There are a slew of his interviews I always post. I couldn't recall if I added this particular story to 3quarks when I post his Democracy Now interview. Anyway, I am glad to see it made the cut. Great story. Chomsky, is truly one of my favorite philosophers and activists.
Posted by: Scout | Jun 25, 2012 1:58:07 AM
Of course. What would we do without a periodic uncritical Chomsky profile/hagiography? Comon, haven't we been out of college for a while?
Posted by: Al | Jun 25, 2012 11:22:16 AM
It is not hagiography to recognize and appreciate that Noam Chomsky is a great human being.
Posted by: Louise Gordon | Jun 25, 2012 1:33:55 PM
If Chomsky had been a Soviet dissident he would have won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Posted by: Raza | Jun 25, 2012 3:26:41 PM
But he's not a Soviet dissident. No Gulag and no exile threatens him. The very comparison is absurd.
Posted by: Al | Jun 26, 2012 12:57:07 PM
So being a Soviet dissident is the only way to be worthy? The very thought is absurd.
The fact that Chomsky isn't threatened with a Gulag or exile is not the sole way to judge him. Were that the case, there would be almost no virtue in the U.S., and I actually believe that we do still have some virtuous people here. He isn't perfect, but he has brought to light things that almost no one of similar stature has (e.g., East Timor), and for that we owe him a debt of gratitude. A person shouldn't have to be 100% correct to be worthy of admiration, and while I find him irritating sometimes, that is his role and it's valuable.
Posted by: Sarah D. | Jun 27, 2012 12:00:51 AM
Post a comment