| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Call me the greatest American novel: Moby-Dick | Main | jadak »

June 20, 2012

The Twilight of The Elites

13151179Over at Crooked Timber, Aaron Swartz reviews Chris Hayes’ new book:

In his new book, The Twilight of the Elites: America After Meritocracy, Chris Hayes manages the impossible trifecta: the book is compellingly readable, impossibly erudite, and—most stunningly of all—correct. At the end, I was left with just two quibbles: first, the book’s chapter on “pop epistemology” thoroughly explicated how elites got stuff wrong without bothering to mention the non-elites who got things right, leaving the reader with the all-too-common impression that getting it right was impossible; and second, the book never assembled its (surprisingly sophisticated) argument into a single summary. To discuss it, I feel we have to start with remedying the latter flaw:

Our nation’s institutions have crumbled, Hayes argues. From 2000–2010 (the “Fail Decade”), every major societal institution failed. Big businesses collapsed with Enron and Worldcom, their auditors failed to catch it, the Supreme Court got partisan in Bush v. Gore, our intelligence apparatus failed to catch 9/11, the media lied us into wars, the military failed to win them, professional sports was all on steroids, the church engaged in and covered up sex abuse, the government compounded disaster upon disaster in Katrina, and the banks crashed our economy. How did it all go so wrong?

Hayes pins the blame on an unlikely suspect: meritocracy. We thought we would just simply pick out the best and raise them to the top, but once they got there they inevitably used their privilege to entrench themselves and their kids (inequality is, Hayes says, “autocatalytic”). Opening up the elite to more efficient competition didn’t make things more fair, it just legitimated a more intense scramble. The result was an arms race among the elite, pushing all of them to embrace the most unscrupulous forms of cheating and fraud to secure their coveted positions.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 03:36 AM | Permalink

Comments

Interesting review -I'll check the book out. For more on meritocracy and its problems see:

http://www.chrishorner.net/the-injustices-of-merit/

Posted by: Chris | Jun 20, 2012 6:42:18 AM

Regardless of any economic or other advantage that anyone has because of 'whatever', a resulting inequity occurs only if the advantaged person specifically makes a concerted effort and takes advantage of it; if they do not then there is no resulting inequity. The alternate inequity exists when a DISadvantaged (whatever definition) individual is provided an 'equitable' advantage and makes no specific effort BUT takes the benefit that the advantage gives…is this inequity? Practical example: a doctoral degree program admits persons under lower entry standards, along with others who must meet the normal standards to be accepted...the advantaged person makes no concerted effort to raise performance ie. produces work product reflective of beginning ability and receives the same degree that the regular participants of the normal program rigors earn...this example is factual… I was in just such a program.

Posted by: mstrickl | Jun 21, 2012 10:14:12 AM

The U.S. is obviously not a meritocracy but an oligarchy. The so called free market is rigged by corporate welfare bums.

Posted by: Olavi Valo | Jun 21, 2012 11:51:52 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

LWR on Tuesday Poem

Joss on Tuesday Poem

LWR on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Rashid on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Yoann on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Dave Ranning on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

sadhana on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Carol Westbrook on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Ken Bryant on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Umer Vakil on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Kabir on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Nina on White Indians

Nina on White Indians

Dave Ranning on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

Mohammed Hassanali on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

musafir on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Maniza on Aftermath: Pakistan Elections 2013

Ellen Perry on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

waqnis on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Norman Costa on The Bystander Effect in Medical Care. Why Do I Have So Many Doctors Not Taking Care of Me?

Hannah Carlton on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Joe on Digging Up Bones or, The Labyrinths beneath Our Feet

JonJ on The Beautiful German Language

cpfaff on Passionate About The Actor's Art: an interview with Michael Howard

Sumiran on Sunday Poem

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed