| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Q&A: Norman Finkelstein | Main | Recharting the Map of Social and Political Theory: Where is Government? Where is Conservatism? »

June 13, 2012

India Recalls Reign of Victoria

Munshi_1605081cManu Joseph in the New York Times:

As Britain celebrates six decades of Elizabeth II as monarch, it is the reign of another queen that contemporary India resembles.

It may be nearly impossible to accept that Victorian Britain, with its frock coats and parasols, had anything in common with present-day India, where “ladies” and “gentlemen” are primarily toilet signs. But, if the charades of appearances and manners are stripped away, and if only economic tumult and questions of conscience are considered, then mid-nineteenth-century Britain had much in common with India today.

In the England of that time, there were sharp increases in wealth, but the Industrial Revolution had also heaped a vast number of urban poor in plain sight. The accepted wisdom then was that poverty was the unavoidable curse of an unlucky majority. But that notion was slowly demolished by some brilliant men and women who, in their efforts to devise a cure, were building the rudiments of modern economics. A newly enriched society was beginning to accept that abject poverty in its midst was a morally indefensible paradox.

Sylvia Nasar, in her recent book “Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius ,” describes the observations of the 24-year-old mathematician Alfred Marshall on an unremarkable day in 1867, many years before he became one of the most influential economists of his time. In Manchester, she writes, Marshall found “the smoky brown sky, muddy brown streets, and long piles of warehouses, cavernous mills and insalubrious tenements — all within a few hundred yards of glittering shops, gracious parks and grand hotels. ... In the narrow back streets he encountered sallow undersized men and stunted, pale factory girls. ...”

This could be, without any changes, a scene in any major Indian city today.

Posted by Robin Varghese at 12:17 AM | Permalink

Comments

A bit of a cheap shot, without much to support it, isn't it? The Economist describes Arundhati Roy's writings as "flawed"? Hardly an unbiased publication when it comes to criticism of the economic status quot.

Posted by: Klausi | Jun 13, 2012 6:27:27 AM

The crucial difference between today's India and the Britain that Manu Joseph describes is that one of them had a large colony that supplied free raw materials to fuel its vast mills. Colonies were taxed heavily and large resources redirected to the fuel the empire.

Given that, all other supposed similarities are irrelevant.

Posted by: ganji | Jun 13, 2012 10:07:32 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Junaida on Tuesday Poem

rafiq on Tuesday Poem

Raza Husain on the culture animal

Nebor on Tuesday Poem

Eleutheria on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

carlos on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Joe on the culture animal

Sundar on the culture animal

Eleutheria on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

Eleutheria on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

Matt on The Science Mystique

Eleutheria on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Elatia Harris on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

PeteChapman on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Raza Husain on the culture animal

Chris on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

DAS on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

DAS on Is the Brain No Different From a Light Switch? The Uncomfortable Ideas of the Philosopher Daniel Dennett

DAS on the culture animal

Raza Husain on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Dredd on NORTH KOREA’S NERVE WAR

Dredd on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Raza Husain on Is the Brain No Different From a Light Switch? The Uncomfortable Ideas of the Philosopher Daniel Dennett

Dana on germ houses

musafir on Tuesday Poem

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed