| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Blonde hair evolved more than once | Main | What would Jaurès do? »

May 04, 2012

The Neuroscience of Prayer: It's a Brain Puzzle

From The European:

Beten_d_rerIn a recent study our team used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate how the brain responded to praying in Christian believers. Surprisingly, considering God’s postulated invisibility, omnipresence, omnipotence, and omniscience, we found that conversing with God was not associated with regions that process abstract concepts. Rather, we found a marked pattern of activity in four regions that typically activate when humans relate to other humans. Neurologically, this finding suggests that strong believers process God as a concrete person – in spite of the theologically complex and highly abstract nature of the Christian God. Interestingly, we did not find this pattern in believers who did not use praying regularly. Perhaps the religious brain can learn to treat gods as real persons through regular practice and strong beliefs. 

Importantly and somewhat contrary to the widespread assumption that communicating with God constitutes a unique experience reserved for believers, our findings suggest that praying to God is comparable to ‘normal’ interpersonal interaction, at least in terms of brain function. Praying, it seems, is subserved by the basic processing of our biologically evolved dispositions like other complex cultural phenomena, in this case the evolved human capacity for social cognition. One might ask if these findings, then, are evidence that God is just an illusion, an imagined friend that always listens in times of distress? Or may they in fact be proof that God affects us even at the level of brain function? Atheists and believers alike take considerable interest in this kind of research. Fortunately, as a scientist my interest lies solely in the physical world and speculations about the spiritual dimension lie well beyond scientific scrutiny.

More here.

Posted by Azra Raza at 06:26 AM | Permalink

Comments

"One might ask if these findings, then, are evidence that God is just an illusion, an imagined friend that always listens in times of distress? Or may they in fact be proof that God affects us even at the level of brain function?"

Do the tomato plants grow in my garden just from the soil and water, or are there invisible fairies who come at night to help them grow? Gee, I guess it's a toss-up. 50-50. Could go either way.

Posted by: FrankZ | May 4, 2012 10:38:40 AM

--
"...speculations about the spiritual dimension lie well beyond scientific scrutiny."
--

No, they don't. There are plenty of religious intrusions into the magisterium of science, and many of them are testable. If there is a natural explanation and a miraculous explanation for something, Occam tells me which one to go with.

Posted by: Brian | May 5, 2012 1:28:06 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Sundar on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Jim on Why Shouldn't I Work for the NSA?

Stuart Mathieson on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Rajesh Rao: A Rosetta Stone for the Indus script

Norman Costa on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Lusine on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Raza Husain on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

martina_j on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Raza Husain on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Bill on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

roger gathmann on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Doogle on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

Kyle on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Peter John on Gezi Park

dthoko on The History of Typography - Animated Short

Richard on John Gray’s Godless Mysticism

Abbas Raza on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

nogodrod on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Bill on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Gezi Park

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed