May 10, 2012
The brain… it makes you think. Doesn't it? David Eagleman vs Raymond Tallis
Are we governed by unconscious processes? Neuroscience believes so – but isn't the human condition more complicated than that? Two experts offer different views.
David Eagleman and Raymond Tallis in The Guardian:
David Eagleman: It is clear at this point that we are irrevocably tied to the 3lb of strange computational material found within our skulls. The brain is utterly alien to us, and yet our personalities, hopes, fears and aspirations all depend on the integrity of this biological tissue. How do we know this? Because when the brain changes, we change. Our personality, decision-making, risk-aversion, the capacity to see colours or name animals – all these can change, in very specific ways, when the brain is altered by tumours, strokes, drugs, disease or trauma. As much as we like to think about the body and mind living separate existences, the mental is not separable from the physical.
This clarifies some aspects of our existence while deepening the mystery and the awe of others.
For example, take the vast, unconscious, automated processes that run under the hood of conscious awareness. We have discovered that the large majority of the brain's activity takes place at this low level: the conscious part – the "me" that flickers to life when you wake up in the morning – is only a tiny bit of the operations. This understanding has given us a better understanding of the complex multiplicity that makes a person. A person is not a single entity of a single mind: a human is built of several parts, all of which compete to steer the ship of state. As a consequence, people are nuanced, complicated, contradictory. We act in ways that are sometimes difficult to detect by simple introspection. To know ourselves increasingly requires careful studies of the neural substrate of which we are composed.
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 05:40 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Tallis clearly gets the better of the exchange, I think.
Posted by: Chris | May 10, 2012 6:14:51 AM
An excellent exchange; thanks for posting this.
Posted by: Philip Graham | May 10, 2012 2:11:17 PM
Love it - thanks for posting this. It seems clear to me that Eagleman got the better of the exchange. Tallis seems obstructive; Eagleman seems careful and levelheaded.
Posted by: Matias | May 10, 2012 5:28:12 PM
Thinking is an illusion just as free will is an illusion. It is an after the fact record (memory/storage) of the events of the sensory inputs, the chemical, electrical and physical reactions of the body.
Posted by: Raza | May 12, 2012 9:45:08 AM
Post a comment