| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Gandhi's Letter to Hitler | Main | cowtown »

May 30, 2012

Sean Carroll to Judge 4th Annual 3QD Science Prize

UPDATE 6/25/12: The winners have been announced here.

UPDATE 6/18/12: The finalists have been announced here.

UPDATE 6/17/12: The semifinalists have been announced here.

UPDATE 6/11/12: Voting round is now open. Click here to see full list of nominees and vote.

Dear Readers, Writers, Bloggers,

SeanWe are very honored and pleased to announce that Sean M. Carroll has agreed to be the final judge for our 4th annual prize for the best blog and online writing in the category of science. (Details of the previous science prizes can be seen by clicking on the names of their respective judges here: Steven Pinker, Richard Dawkins, and Lisa Randall).

I have to admit that I was especially and extraordinarily pleased when Sean agreed to judge this prize for a number of reasons:

  1. Sean is a practicing scientist at the forefront of his field, which is physics.
  2. Sean is also one of the foremost science communicators of our time (I extremely highly recommend his last book From Eternity to Here) and he was one of the early science bloggers with Preposterous Universe and has continued with the ever excellent Cosmic Variance.
  3. Sean was an early supporter of 3QD and drove much traffic to us in our early days when we were basically unknown. Thanks again, Sean! :-)
  4. I am honored and happy to count Sean and his very distinguished (and former 3QD columnist) science-writer wife, Jennifer Oullette, as friends.
  5. Sean is a past winner of a 3QD prize himself.

Sean, as many of you may already know, is a physicist at the California Institute of Technology. He received his Ph.D. in 1993 from Harvard University. His research focuses on theoretical physics and cosmology, especially the origin and constituents of the universe, and he has contributed to models of interactions between dark matter, dark energy, and ordinary matter; alternative theories of gravity; and violations of fundamental symmetries. Sean is the author of "From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time," "Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity," and the upcoming "The Particle at the End of the Universe."  He blogs at Cosmic Variance, hosted by Discover magazine, and has been featured on television shows such as The Colbert Report and Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman. You may follow him on Twitter here.

As usual, this is the way it will work: the nominating period is now open, and will end at 11:59 pm EST on June 9, 2012. There will then be a round of voting by our readers which will narrow down the entries to the top twenty semi-finalists. After this, we will take these top twenty voted-for nominees, and the four main editors of 3 Quarks Daily (Abbas Raza, Robin Varghese, Morgan Meis, and Azra Raza) will select six finalists from these, plus they may also add up to three wildcard entries of their own choosing. The three winners will be chosen from these by Sean Carroll.

The first place award, called the "Top Quark," will include a cash prize of one thousand dollars; the second place prize, the "Strange Quark," will include a cash prize of three hundred dollars; and the third place winner will get the honor of winning the "Charm Quark," along with a two hundred dollar prize.

(Welcome to those coming here for the first time. Learn more about who we are and what we do here, and do check out the full site here. Bookmark us and come back regularly, or sign up for the RSS feed.)

Details:

PrizeScienceAnnounceSeanThe winners of this prize will be announced on June 25, 2012. Here's the schedule:

May 30, 2012:

  • The nominations are opened. Please nominate your favorite blog entry by placing the URL for the blog post (the permalink) in the comments section of this post. You may also add a brief comment describing the entry and saying why you think it should win. (Do NOT nominate a whole blog, just one individual blog post.)
  • Blog posts longer than 4,000 words are strongly discouraged, but we might make an exception if there is something truly extraordinary.
  • Each person can only nominate one blog post.
  • Entries must be in English.
  • The editors of 3QD reserve the right to reject entries that we feel are not appropriate.
  • The blog entry may not be more than a year old. In other words, it must have been written after May 29, 2011.
  • You may also nominate your own entry from your own or a group blog (and we encourage you to).
  • Guest columnists at 3 Quarks Daily are also eligible to be nominated, and may also nominate themselves if they wish.
  • Nominations are limited to the first 200 entries.
  • Prize money must be claimed within a month of the announcement of winners.

June 9, 2012

  • The nominating process will end at 11:59 PM (NYC time) of this date.
  • The public voting will be opened soon afterwards.

June 16, 2012

  • Public voting ends at 11:59 PM (NYC time).

June 25, 2012

  • The winners are announced.

One Final and Important Request

If you have a blog or website, please help us spread the word about our prizes by linking to this post. Otherwise, post a link on your Facebook profile, Tweet it, or just email your friends and tell them about it! I really look forward to reading some very good material, and think this should be a lot of fun for all of us.

Best of luck and thanks for your attention!

Yours,

Abbas

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 12:40 AM | Permalink

Comments

The links are part of the experience! Make sure you follow the video link showing how the pictured aurora changes.

Posted by: Robert Nemiroff | May 30, 2012 10:22:44 AM

http://www.southernfriedscience.com/?p=11009

I nominate the above linked post "Climbing Mount Chernobyl" from the Southern Fried Science blog.

I found it to be well written and very thought provoking - a post that really stuck in my mind.

Posted by: Andrew Guerin | May 30, 2012 11:25:30 AM

http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=2384604
I nominate the above linked post, for Philosophy (of Cosmology) category.

Posted by: Aiya-Oba | May 30, 2012 12:06:45 PM

http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2012/04/physicist-uses-math-to-beat-traffic.html

I nominate my recent post titled, "Physicist uses math to beat traffic ticket."

The post engaged a large audience that searched for the self-admitted flaw in the physicist's argument, and it also led to widespread media coverage.

Posted by: Brian Jacobsmeyer | May 30, 2012 12:15:27 PM

http://worldofweirdthings.com/2012/04/27/oh-quantum-causality-we-hardly-knew-ye/

I shamelessly nominate my own post about a quantum physics experiment which seems to violate causality at first blush, and explain why and how this seemingly bizarre and abstract experiment could aid computing and communications were its results replicated, as well as try to offer nontechnical explanations of what seems to be happening.

Posted by: Greg Fish | May 30, 2012 12:19:52 PM

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap120201.html

The links are part of the experience! Make sure you follow the video link showing how the pictured aurora changes.

(2nd try at this post -- my apologies for the first.)

Posted by: Robert Nemiroff | May 30, 2012 12:34:03 PM

Wow, what an excellent choice for judge. I shamelessly nominate my own blog post. :)

http://www.empiricalzeal.com/2011/07/14/what-it-feels-like-for-a-sperm/

Posted by: Aatish | May 30, 2012 12:37:26 PM

'Can Economic Growth Last?' From 'Do The Math' by Thomas Murphey

http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/07/can-economic-growth-last/

Posted by: photon | May 30, 2012 2:31:38 PM

I'm going to nominate my self because the science community needs to know more about the future of the Internet and science. Internet community and the science community goes hand to hand.

Posted by: Kevin Dorival | May 30, 2012 3:01:05 PM

http://stochasticscientist.blogspot.com/2012/03/carbon-monoxide-as-therapy.html

I'm following the trend of shamelessly nominating my own article. Hey, I thought it was interesting!

Posted by: Kathy Orlinsky | May 30, 2012 5:16:41 PM

Another self-nomination:
http://theobrominated.blogspot.co.nz/2011/06/how-can-flower-like-this-exist.html
It's a post about evolution of flowers, phylogenetics, and mentions pareidoleia.

Posted by: Phil Garnock-Jones | May 30, 2012 5:28:07 PM

I just used this one for a course I teach; a great intro to one of last year's hot topics due to the German E. coli outbreak:

http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/2011/06/24/hemolytic-uremic-syndrome-hus-4/

Posted by: Jimmy | May 30, 2012 7:56:49 PM

Nominating the excellent blog by Matt Strassler and this post in particular : http://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/largehadroncolliderfaq/whats-a-proton-anyway/

Posted by: Cd | May 30, 2012 8:17:37 PM

Yet another shameless self-nomination:

https://inspiringscience.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/through-the-gut-how-plants-in-food-regulate-genes-in-animals/

It's about the surprising discovery that RNA from plants in our food survives digestion and can regulate the expression level of specific genes in other organs such as the liver.

Thanks for the opportunity to take part!

Posted by: sedeer | May 30, 2012 8:23:11 PM

I nominate the series for the month of February: http://www.physics4thecool.com/2012_02_01_archive.html, covering science in general, and diversity in science in particular.

Posted by: Reggie Goodwin | May 30, 2012 9:05:06 PM

I nominate a cool post by Miss Behavior that weaves together neuroscience, animal behavior and pop-culture.

http://the-scorpion-and-the-frog.blogspot.com/2012/04/social-punishment-of-samantha-brick.html

Posted by: Matt Magolan | May 30, 2012 10:57:52 PM

I nominate the series for the month of Febuary:

http://www.physics4thecool.com/2012_02_01_archive.html

covering science in general, and diversity in science in particular.

Posted by: Reggie Goodwin | May 31, 2012 1:26:49 AM

Singular article submission:

http://www.physics4thecool.com/2011/06/einstein-darwin-21st-century.html

"Einstein, Darwin & the 21st Century"

Posted by: Reggie Goodwin | May 31, 2012 1:40:03 AM


I will shamelessly nominate my own live blog of the Higgs news from CERN in December

http://blog.vixra.org/2011/12/13/the-higgs-boson-live-from-cern/

"Higgs Boson Live Blog: Analysis of the CERN announcement"

This included some preliminary information about the Higgs Boson, followed by live coverage of the announcements by CMS and ATLAS teams, and finally some unofficial Combinations of their results.

Posted by: Philip Gibbs | May 31, 2012 3:33:07 AM

Not my own article, but a post by a colleague at the same blog I contribute to.

http://trenchesofdiscovery.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/war-of-immune-worlds.html

It describes the never ending war going on inside the human body: immune system vs pathogen. It includes the weapons that are deployed boy both sides and the defences used by each side to counter.

It was part of a series, but if I can only nominate one, this is it.

Posted by: Shaun | May 31, 2012 7:14:00 AM

I submit the recent blog post on computers and medicine: Why Your Next Doctor May Be A Computer

It was informative (accurate) and stimulated a lot of conversation.

Posted by: Brian | May 31, 2012 9:24:12 AM

I nominate “We Suck at Math” from Above the Market. It helpfully and thoughtfully intertwines Feynman, Hofstadter, investment analysis and XKCD in one engaging post.

http://rpseawright.wordpress.com/2012/05/14/we-suck-at-math/

Posted by: Emily | May 31, 2012 10:41:06 AM

I nominate the post "Does Pinker's 'Better Angels' Undermine Religious Morality?" from the blog Why We Reason. It considered Steven Pinker's recent release to argue that religion is not responsible for the decline of violence and increase of social rights over the last several thousand years.

Posted by: Sam McNerney | May 31, 2012 11:26:02 AM

Just a superb blog by a very interesting person and some company.

Posted by: dylan lawless | May 31, 2012 12:54:50 PM

http://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/

Posted by: dylan lawless | May 31, 2012 12:55:35 PM

http://www.katiephd.com/what-exactly-is-a-genetically-modified-plant/

This is one of mine, where I try and get the facts behind the genetic modification of edible plants straight. I even drew the pictures myself :)

Posted by: Katie PhD | May 31, 2012 1:24:59 PM

I'd like to nominate my own post about the connection between the "size" of evolutionary changes and the way we discover the genetics underlying human diseases and other traits.

http://www.denimandtweed.com/2012/01/baby-steps-versus-long-jumps-size-of.html

Posted by: Jeremy Yoder | May 31, 2012 1:28:00 PM

http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2012/05/how-to-make-line.html

Posted by: Tim | May 31, 2012 3:11:37 PM

Ms. Behavior's blog is entertaining and educational. My students and I in D.C. love to read it each week.

Posted by: Chris | May 31, 2012 3:13:31 PM

I nominate Christopher Lane's blog post on withdrawal symptoms that occur when an SSRI drug is discontinued. These drugs are much in the news, but the withdrawal symptoms and brain cell death that can occur through their use is not given much publicity. Why would Pharma want that?

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/side-effects/201107/antidepressant-withdrawal-syndrome-findings-recommendations-and-resources

Posted by: Louise Gordon | May 31, 2012 3:17:11 PM

Here's my own favourite blog post of the past year, about pirates and biochemistry and history and capybaras:

http://easternblot.net/2011/07/13/make-history-not-vitamin-c/

Posted by: Eva | May 31, 2012 4:13:32 PM

I nominate this blog post about bees http://the-scorpion-and-the-frog.blogspot.com/2012/05/why-this-horde-of-idiots-is-no-genius.html -- I found it both entertaining and extremely informative. It became a popular metaphor in my organization for improving our work.

Posted by: SuziQ | May 31, 2012 4:19:54 PM

Developing decentralized mechanisms for using decentralized information, using the potential wisdom of crowds, is important for economics, especially in some public policy applications. Good to see how some other critters do it.

Posted by: Gametheoryman | May 31, 2012 5:09:40 PM

This was my favorite post of mine from the last year, so I nominate it:
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/science-sushi/2011/10/24/brain_chemistry_emotional_wounds/

Posted by: Christie | May 31, 2012 5:10:50 PM

What the heck, I'll throw my recent post from my blog in to the ring:

http://www.ifweassume.com/2012/05/plots-as-art.html

Posted by: Jim | May 31, 2012 5:40:38 PM

http://chronicle.com/blogs/percolator/birds-lose-their-magnetic-maps-as-scientists-reverse-direction/29013

I too, am self-nominating one of my Percolator posts, on the cool issue of birds' missing mental maps, because it revealed a scientific controversy and the ways scientists have attempted to resolve it.

Posted by: Josh Fischman | May 31, 2012 6:03:44 PM

I am self-nominating this blog post. The topic is something that affects virtually all adults: How to interpret PSA and mammogram results. This requires an understanding of Bayesian reasoning, and this blog explains that in a way that patients can understand.

Posted by: Denise Cummins | May 31, 2012 6:16:32 PM

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/eruptions/

Easy call on this one!

Posted by: Matt Mabus | May 31, 2012 6:23:54 PM

http://matt.might.net/articles/my-sons-killer/

A long post of short text by Matt Might on finding an entirely unique and deadly genetic disorder and the one human being it affects, the author's son.

Posted by: TSLD | May 31, 2012 6:29:38 PM

I nominate: http://the-scorpion-and-the-frog.blogspot.com/2012_02_01_archive.html
It's well written, topical and provides links to further investigation.

Posted by: DataGrrl | May 31, 2012 6:53:33 PM

Y'all make self-nomination look like such fun that I cannot resist doing it myself:

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/doing-good-science/2011/10/27/methodology-versus-beliefs-what-did-marcus-ross-do-wrong/

A post in which I examine our commitment to the idea that good scientific claims are grounded in good methodology, rather than having the right beliefs in our heads, by exploring our discomfort with a working geoscientist who is also a young earth creationist.

Posted by: Janet D. Stemwedel | May 31, 2012 7:09:55 PM

I hate to self-nominate, but I'm especially proud of this post that examines a volcanic mystery:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/the-mysterious-missing-eruption-of-1258-a-d/

Posted by: Erik | May 31, 2012 7:31:18 PM

While I agree with Erik of Eruptions Blog on his nomination (it was top on my short list for nomination, along with many others), I've a different nomination.

I came to this conclusion after thinking about why it is that I check on his blog and subsequent thread several times a day.

1. Erik has a painless way of injecting clear scientific reasoning into the most mushy (heh, today's post) of topics.

2. He attracts others of the same inclination, so that the threads become whole learning exercises in themselves.

3. It's about VOLCANOES!

So, I nominate the following, which became such a hit in all three areas, that he had to write a follow-up post. So, I consider both posts as one post, but if you only can use one, use the first:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/12/the-right-and-wrong-way-to-die-when-you-fall-into-lava/

extension of the post:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/01/can-you-walk-on-lava-falling-into-lava-revisited/

Posted by: Parclair | May 31, 2012 7:51:05 PM

My nomination is http://the-scorpion-and-the-frog.blogspot.com/2012/02/love-hormone-of-2012.html

How often does a science blog post make you giggle? This one was a blast, and made some great points while allowing for further discusson.

Posted by: Mommy1 | May 31, 2012 8:14:25 PM

My attempt to popularize the weirdness of quantum physics:
http://www.science20.com/hammock_physicist/einstein_got_it_wrong_can_you_do_better-85544

Posted by: Johannes Koelman | May 31, 2012 8:39:31 PM

I nominate "Pigeons, the Internet, and the Meaning of Science." I found it to be upbeat, full of wonder, and a real call to action.

http://writescience.wordpress.com/2011/12/17/pigeons-the-internet-and-the-meaning-of-science/

Posted by: Michelle Larson | May 31, 2012 9:48:02 PM

I nom nom nominate my post, Climbing Mount Chernobyl - http://www.southernfriedscience.com/?p=11009

Posted by: Andrew | Jun 1, 2012 10:00:13 AM

Self nomination of a post I had fun writing this past year about the Eric Clapton, Chuck Berry and the Fermi Paradox: http://writescience.wordpress.com/2011/12/09/smartphones-and-the-enduring-silence-of-the-cosmos/

Posted by: Shane Larson | Jun 1, 2012 12:45:35 PM

My post reveals a likely explanation for why humans are so hopeless at remembering some things, and yet so awesome at remembering others.

I think the post provides a useful perspective to both the layman and the cognitive scientist, and does a good job of explaining why we should care in the first place.

Posted by: Julian De Freitas | Jun 1, 2012 1:17:36 PM

And here it is: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-memory-so-good-bad

Posted by: Julian De Freitas | Jun 1, 2012 1:19:11 PM

I nominate
http://coraifeartaigh.wordpress.com/2012/02/11/a-tribute-to-stephen-hawking/

After participating in a short and unsatisfactory TV interview on the life and science of Stephen Hawking, I posted this article on my blog as catharsis.

Posted by: Cormac O Rafferty | Jun 1, 2012 4:13:30 PM

I nominate The Neurocritic for this entry:

http://neurocritic.blogspot.com/2012/04/little-evidence-for-direct-link-between.html

An excellent critique.

Posted by: Sandra | Jun 1, 2012 8:31:33 PM

I shamelessly nominate my own post "Pizza and Panini". It is about an imaginary conversation between Socrates and the Sanskrit grammarian Panini. It is a sort of sly comment on the Eurocentricity of the way we look at ancient Greek mathematics - the mathematical sciences, f you will - versus ancient Indian mathematics.

http://delfikorakle.blogspot.com/2012/06/pizza-and-panini.html

This could be nominated in a different category (Arts and Literature) as well, but I think I will stick with this one because it is so mathematical as an article.

Thanks, Sean and Abbas.

Posted by: Anand Manikutty | Jun 1, 2012 8:33:54 PM

I've decided to nominate "Your Appendix Could Save Your Life" by Rob Dunn in the Scientific American guest blog: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/01/02/your-appendix-could-save-your-life/

Nominations seem to be coming slowly this year, judging from the fact that I can't find a link to "comments page two", which suggests there isn't one yet. (It's advisable to scan comments before nominating, in order to avoid doubling up on someone else's nomination.)

Of the other articles I considered nominating, one has already been nominated above.

Posted by: Adrian Morgan | Jun 2, 2012 3:19:54 AM

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2012/03/27/why-is-there-something-instead/

This is but one of Ehtan Siegel's fantastic posts, as always, it's fun and informative, and he has a unique ability to instill a great appreciation for science and dumbstruck wonder at the universe in the reader.

What's more, Siegel is completely bonkers mad, his massive and energetic passion always shines through in his writing. Fantastic!

Posted by: MIck | Jun 2, 2012 9:11:02 AM

With trepidation, I enter the field of self-promotion with a brief, accessible post on contemporary human evolution.

http://beastbardbot.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/are-humans-still-evolving/

Posted by: GunnarDW | Jun 2, 2012 11:37:40 AM

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2012/03/09/the-most-astounding-fact-about/
I nominate the above blog post, because it is very inspiring, rationale and courageous.

Posted by: mindhacked | Jun 3, 2012 12:38:01 AM

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/03/07/a-world-within-a-tumour-%E2%80%93-new-study-shows-just-how-complex-cancer-can-be/

Nominated by Prof. Barry Sharpless.

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Jun 3, 2012 9:46:09 AM

http://astrobites.com/2012/04/26/this-star-lives-in-exciting-times-or-how-did-betelgeuse-make-that-funny-shape/

I nominate my blog post on simulations of winds from the supergiant star Betelgeuse. I liked it because it presents neat research of a type that's not usually picked up by the media.

Posted by: Elisabeth Newton | Jun 3, 2012 4:11:01 PM

I nominate Flip Tanedo:

http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2011/06/19/helicity-chirality-mass-and-the-higgs/

Posted by: Alex | Jun 3, 2012 7:35:44 PM

I shamelessly nominate my own post analyzing and explaining the Planetary Resources plan for asteroid mining in the context of both space exploration and astrophysics:

http://astrobites.com/2012/04/29/lets-lasso-us-some-space-rocks-asteroid-mining-and-you/

Posted by: Elizabeth Lovegrove | Jun 4, 2012 12:43:17 AM

I nominate a blog post of mine regarding the neuroscience of deja vu:

http://www.gainesonbrains.com/2012/02/seeing-into-future-neuroscience-of-deja.html

Posted by: Jordan | Jun 4, 2012 9:56:38 AM

What a great collection of posts! I nominate a post of mine on thermoregulation, pheromonal communication and sexual deception in snakes:

http://the-scorpion-and-the-frog.blogspot.com/2012/05/snakes-deceive-to-get-little-snuggle.html

Posted by: Miss Behavior | Jun 4, 2012 10:50:05 PM

I nominate one of my own posts about vaccines & anti-vaccine fearmongering:

http://puffthemutantdragon.wordpress.com/2011/12/10/do-vaccines-contain-toxic-chemicals/

Posted by: Puff the Mutant Dragon | Jun 5, 2012 12:22:51 AM

I'm nominating this piece I wrote for BoingBoing, which took a study that was making headlines elsewhere and found the real (and far more interesting) story behind the data.

Other publications had written this up as a story about the fallout from Fukushima. In reality, it was a story about coal pollution and climate change.

http://boingboing.net/2011/08/18/what-fukushima-can-teach-us-about-coal-pollution.html

Posted by: Maggie Koerth-Baker | Jun 5, 2012 12:40:07 PM

This is a recent post of mine for the 13.7 NPR blog on science and culture, which I co-founded with Adam Frank a couple of years ago.

It deals with the recent physics vs. philosophy controversy, as sparked by the unfortunate pronouncements by Lawrence Krauss on his book and what David Albert said about it. I wrote it to try to clarify things and to state what science can and cannot do, something that many colleagues seem to forget during these days of high hyperbole.

Posted by: Marcelo Gleiser | Jun 5, 2012 1:05:29 PM

I guess I should copy the link to the text:

http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2012/05/02/151769880/physics-vs-philosophy-really

Posted by: Marcelo Gleiser | Jun 5, 2012 1:06:58 PM

Do the brains of psychopathic individuals show both literal (white matter) and metaphorical (interpersonal relations) disconnections?

http://neurocritic.blogspot.com/2011/12/disconnection-of-psychopaths.html

Thanks for allowing me to nominate this post.

Posted by: The Neurocritic | Jun 5, 2012 5:04:36 PM

Adding to all these other great submissions, I would like to nominate my blog post "Saturn’s rings explained…", which highlights the evolution of our understanding of the Saturn's ring system, emphasizing the role of Enceladus.

http://astroian.wordpress.com/2012/04/18/saturns-rings-explained/

Posted by: Ian Cohen | Jun 5, 2012 9:14:57 PM

I nominate a blog post of mine about the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) public data release

Posted by: Kim | Jun 6, 2012 1:09:39 AM

I nominate a blog post of mine about the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) public data release

http://astrobites.com/2012/03/19/the-wise-way-to-deal-with-2-7-million-images-a-public-data-release/

Posted by: Kim | Jun 6, 2012 1:15:28 AM

So I nominate my post on "The hunt for the first exoplanet," which I think it makes for a good read and gets across scientific and historical information

http://backreaction.blogspot.de/2012/04/hunt-for-first-exoplanet.html

Posted by: Bee | Jun 6, 2012 3:55:06 AM

My submission is Artie Aardvark's Amazing ASTRON Adventures- http://whereisyvette.com/2011/10/09/artie-aardvarks-amazing-astron-adventures/

I'm an Astronomy PhD at the University of Amsterdam who has traveled quite a bit, and I was trying to find a way to get even non-astronomers interested in the random places the job takes me. Enter Artie Aardvark, the mascot for my research group! The above is the first post of a series that already has several entries in it, where Artie visits places like radio telescope sites or the 2012 AAS meeting.

Consensus is Artie is way cuter about explaining these things than I ever would be. :)

Posted by: Yvette Cendes | Jun 6, 2012 4:49:05 AM

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/science-sushi/2011/07/18/mythbusting-101-organic-farming-conventional-agriculture/

This post on the realities of organic farming really caused me to rethink my choices as a human living in a consumerist society. I feel that more people need to understand the reality of where our food comes from and how it affects the environment. In order for this planet to support the growing human population, this topic is going to need to be on people's minds as our individual choices in this area become all the more imperative.

Posted by: Daniel | Jun 6, 2012 7:57:18 AM

Because it shows there's more to science on the blogosphere than the standard fare of astronomy, climate change etc

Posted by: Charles Day | Jun 6, 2012 9:50:26 AM

Whoops, I put the entry's URL in the wrong place on the comment form. Here it is

http://blogs.physicstoday.org/thedayside/2012/02/post-1/

Posted by: Charles Day | Jun 6, 2012 9:51:40 AM

This is a great post about group cooperation, particularly among honeybees. This gets me to think, why can't congress cooperate the way little bugs can?

For that see part 2: http://the-scorpion-and-the-frog.blogspot.com/2012/05/why-this-horde-of-idiots-is-no-genius.html

Posted by: Joe Alger | Jun 6, 2012 2:50:04 PM

The part 1 referred to is at the following link:

http://the-scorpion-and-the-frog.blogspot.com/2012/04/can-horde-of-idiots-be-genius.html

I assumed, as did Charles, that the "URL" was the URL of the blog post...

Posted by: Joe Alger | Jun 6, 2012 2:51:24 PM

I nominate my post which compares male privilege in science to the constraints of the visual system.
http://cedarsdigest.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/purple-doesnt-exist-some-thoughts-on-male-privilege-and-science-online/

I tried to mix of blog-like personal reflection with science explaining, and it seemed to strike a chord with my readers.

Posted by: Cedar Riener | Jun 6, 2012 3:22:12 PM

"Life Advice: Think More about Death" is a post I wrote about the psychological benefits of morbid thinking. Thanks!

http://inkfish.fieldofscience.com/2012/04/life-advice-think-more-about-death.html

Posted by: Elizabeth Preston | Jun 6, 2012 4:13:38 PM

Here are some entries I received by email:

http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2011/06/03/watching-photons-interfere-obs/

http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/918.html

http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=954

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2012/05/22/what-is-the-bible-of-psychiatry-supposed-to-do-the-peculiar-challenges-of-an-uncertain-science/

http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2012/03/only-he-was-fully-awake.html

http://www.balloon-juice.com/2011/11/04/im-shocked-shocked-to-find-that-there-are-neutrinos-going-on-here/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/28/my-evening-with-stephen-hawking_n_1549993.html

Posted by: Sean Carroll | Jun 6, 2012 5:00:35 PM

Thanks, Sean. Got 'em. :-)

Posted by: Abbas Raza | Jun 6, 2012 6:21:31 PM

I nominate "EO Wilson's controversial rethink of altruism."

A dispatch from the world science festival 2012 by me - Kristopher Hite.

http://worldsciencefestival.com/blog/eo_wilsons_controversial_rethink_of_altruism

I have a follow-up post in the works as I was able to speak to Wilson at the Festival and he responded directly to Richard Dawkins' recent criticisms in Prospect Magazine.

Happy to enter the competition. Will there be individual or group selection? hahaha.
Cheers
Kristopher

Posted by: Kristopher | Jun 7, 2012 1:04:35 AM

I'll nominate my own post on the "Secret Molecular Life of Soap Bubbles", which covers a forgotten experiment in the history of molecular science and illustrates how profound observations can be seen in the seemingly most mundane phenomena!

http://skullsinthestars.com/2012/05/16/the-secret-molecular-life-of-soap-bubbles-1913/

Posted by: Dr. SkySkull | Jun 7, 2012 12:29:36 PM

I'd like to nominate my father's article on decomposition:

http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2011/12/in-the-kingdom-of-decay-how-a-motley-team-of-subterranean-dwellers-ransacks-the-dead-and-liberates-n.html

Posted by: FDH | Jun 7, 2012 1:28:09 PM

Another self nomination (I know, I know.. but as a grad student I am well accustomed with shamelessness)

http://www.empiricalzeal.com/2012/06/05/the-crayola-fication-of-the-world-how-we-gave-colors-names-and-it-messed-with-our-brains-part-i/

Posted by: Aatish | Jun 7, 2012 3:11:02 PM

Please consider this post from my blog, on the minds of Neanderthals:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2011/11/14/neanderthal-neuroscience/

Posted by: Carl Zimmer | Jun 7, 2012 3:37:48 PM

Whoops, just realized that you can't nominate two. Please disqualify that second submission.

Posted by: aatish | Jun 7, 2012 9:40:16 PM

I'd like to nominate an article by David Dilworth which raises an important question: how much of the so-called "Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation" is really background?

http://cosmologyscience.com/cosblog/cosmic-microwave-angular-resolution-surprise/

The relatively poor angular resolution of the instruments used to measure the CMBR does not allow a clear identification of foreground objects. The inflationary big bang calculation is therefore a fit to a poorly understood background angular distribution.

Posted by: Louis Marmet | Jun 7, 2012 10:08:31 PM

Louis Marmet's article clearly and concisely elucidates the dramatic consequence of finding two extremely distant interacting galaxies behaving as though they were far older than the Big Bang model allows. The galaxies are overflowing with “metals;” they have 10 times too high a percentage of atoms heavier than hydrogen and helium. Metals take many star formation and termination cycles to appear- meaning they are quite old galaxies. Yet Big Bang obligates galaxies at that extreme distance be very young.

http://cosmologyscience.com/cosblog/observation-of-two-early-mature-galaxies-rare-objects-or-is-big-bang-model-inaccurate/

Posted by: David Dilworth | Jun 7, 2012 11:28:28 PM

I'd like to nominated Holly Dunsworth's great post at the Mermaid's Tale: "Forget Bipedalism. What about Babyism."

http://ecodevoevo.blogspot.com/2012/03/forget-bipedalism-what-about-babyism.html

Posted by: Kevin Stacey | Jun 8, 2012 8:10:48 AM

A late self-nomination for my evidence-based defence of the phrase "who to follow":

http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2012/04/05/who-to-follow-is-grammatically-fine/

Grammar is often unhelpfully confused with style and usage; my post seeks to clarify matters by tackling a common pet peeve.

Thank you, and good luck to all entrants!

Posted by: Stan | Jun 8, 2012 8:31:03 AM

I nominate David Dilworth's excellent and thought provoking blog article http://cosmologyscience.com/cosblog/cosmic-microwave-angular-resolution-surprise/

Posted by: Cliff Saunders | Jun 8, 2012 10:36:34 AM

Here's my two cents. I self nominate this post for Cinco de Mayo about the current and historical impacts of agave cultivation and our insatiable desire for tequila.


http://alienplantation.wordpress.com/2012/05/03/agave-de-mayo/

Posted by: Kathryn Turner | Jun 8, 2012 3:22:49 PM

I'd like to nominate my own post on "The Four Loko Effect"

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/thoughtful-animal/2011/08/25/four-loko-copenhagen-philharmonic/

Posted by: Jason G. Goldman | Jun 8, 2012 4:42:41 PM

Hmm... I think this is the post of mine I want to nominate. If only because I want more men to read about vaginas and science.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/context-and-variation/2012/02/28/vaginal-ph-redux-broader-perspectives-on-douching-race-and-lime-juice/

Posted by: KateClancy | Jun 8, 2012 4:45:01 PM

I am nominating my own post. Why not? :)

This covers one of the most critical issues today surrounding education and learning, so I feel it's worth highlighting.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/07/07/the-educational-value-of-creative-disobedience/

Posted by: Andrea Kuszewski | Jun 8, 2012 4:58:26 PM

I nominate Jason Goldman for his post about contagious yawning:
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/thoughtful-animal/2012/05/17/contagious-yawning-evidence-of-empathy/

Posted by: AV Flox | Jun 8, 2012 5:01:24 PM

I nominate this interview with Astronomer Alfonso Aragon Salamanca because it covers all aspects of a science career - the skills you need, the research, the possible industrial careers, the spin-offs and the funding.

Posted by: Ash | Jun 8, 2012 5:02:25 PM

I'd like to nominate a post from Jason Goldman's The Thoughtful Animal. It discusses recent research on the interference of anthropogenic sounds outside of baleen whales' communication range on their sonar habits.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/thoughtful-animal/2012/02/29/can-you-hear-me-now-human-noise-disrupts-blue-whale-communication/

Posted by: Ari | Jun 8, 2012 6:16:41 PM

»

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Tomboktu on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Joe on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Jalees Rehman on The Science Mystique

Dredd on The Moral Status of Rocks

sjg on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Louise Gordon on Why race as a biological construct matters

Louise Gordon on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

musafir on a pretty funny book

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

freddie on The stories of two Palestinian villages: From Al-Araqib to Susiya

Junaida on Tuesday Poem

rafiq on Tuesday Poem

Raza Husain on the culture animal

Nebor on Tuesday Poem

Eleutheria on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

carlos on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Joe on the culture animal

Sundar on the culture animal

Eleutheria on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

Eleutheria on Positive Failure - a review of "The Power" by Rhonda Byrne

Matt on The Science Mystique

Eleutheria on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Eleutheria on I am dust and ashes and full of sin

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed