| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« In the Climate Casino: An Exchange | Main | That purple piece of silk in the urn of Patroclus—could it mean something? »

April 05, 2012

Why do you look for the living among the dead?

TLSWILSON_258993h
Tom Wright, retired Bishop of Durham, now a professor of New Testament studies at St Andrews University, has written over fifty books, nearly all of them concerned with Jesus and most with the question of reconstructing the first-century Palestinian Judaism from which Christianity perhaps sprang. His latest book, with a title which in itself begs many questions, can be seen either as a devotional manual, or as a distillation of a lifetime’s scholarly work, or both. Readers are urgently encouraged to see the world as a first-century Jew would have seen it. Whether Wright succeeds in his task will depend, in part, on the reader’s tolerance of the hectoring tone. “I was trying to explain all this” – no less a matter than God’s overlordship of the world, which surely cannot be explained – “earlier this morning and back came the reply, ‘But I thought God was supposed to be in charge already, all the time?’ Ah, now we’re talking.” Chilling in its clumsiness is the metaphor Wright uses to define the post-Easter world: “Under new management”. Whereas the New Testament speaks of the Kingdom of God, or the Kingdom of Heaven, this author writes of “the vital part of the way in which Jesus operates right now, today, as part of his kingdom-project”.
more from A.N. Wilson at the TLS here.

Posted by Morgan Meis at 04:50 AM | Permalink

Comments

Sorry, 1st century "Palestinian" Judaism is terribly anachronistic. That term would only be acceptable to other Hellenist Romans after 135CE.

netzarim.co.il

Posted by: Eliyahu Konn | Apr 5, 2012 11:11:06 AM

RE: Eliyahu Konn

How exactly is 'first-century Palestinian Judaism' anachronistic?

The word "Palestinian" here is almost certainly referring to the land of Palestine.

Besides, that's not even the main point of the article.

Posted by: Alex Yuen | Apr 5, 2012 4:34:06 PM

W have accounts of both Roman and "Palestinian" historians at the time of "Christ".
He is not present in the historical record.

But, rather bloody magical books mention him often.

So, should we go with the myth, or with the historical record?

Posted by: Dave Ranningd | Apr 6, 2012 3:09:17 PM

I'd go with the uniform testimony of eyewitnesses, who stuck to their story to the point of death.

Maybe it's Buddha you are thinking of, who suddenly appears, hundreds of years after he died?

Posted by: Carlos | Apr 6, 2012 3:29:56 PM

I'd go with the uniform testimony of eyewitnesses, who stuck to their story to the point of death.

Hopeless.
Iron Age Fiction.

Posted by: Dave Ranningd | Apr 6, 2012 10:29:19 PM

Documented by the Iron Age historians you insist on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_on_Jesus

By this time, of course, Nero had been trying to stamp out Christians for decades.

Otherwise intelligent people are free to reject, dispute or even mock claims of Jesus' divinity, but to deny that he existed as a man, and was the center of a sea change in religion and society is an unsupportable position.

In fact, it would be easy to imagine a group of people who held to the belief in the non-existence of Jesus, furiously denying the evidence, closed off from the unimpeachable consensus of experts from multiple disciplines, as a cult.

Posted by: Carlos | Apr 7, 2012 7:59:07 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

musafir on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Norman Costa on Race Is Not Biology

Geoff on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Kai Matthews on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

fallensparks on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

jon s on Race Is Not Biology

musafir on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

musafir on Faith Healing

Dave Ranning on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Geoff on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Luke Lea on Race Is Not Biology

fallensparks on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Luke Lea on Race Is Not Biology

jo smith on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

jo smith on Guy de Maupassant

Geoff on Jeremy Scahill & Noam Chomsky on Secret U.S. Dirty Wars From Yemen to Pakistan to Laos

Jim on Friday Poem

JF on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Jesse on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Kenan Malik on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Pierre on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

chris on Race Is Not Biology

Dave Ranning on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Sumiran on Friday Poem

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed