February 08, 2012
Why economic inequality leads to collapse
Stewart Lansley in The Guardian:
During the past 30 years, a growing share of the global economic pie has been taken by the world's wealthiest people. In the UK and the US, the share of national income going to the top 1% has doubled, setting workforces adrift from economic progress. Today, the world's 1,200 billionaires hold economic firepower that is equivalent to a third of the size of the American economy.
It is this concentration of income – at levels not seen since the 1920s – that is the real cause of the present crisis.
In the UK, the upward transfer of income from wage earners to business and the mega-wealthy amounts to the equivalent of 7% of the economy. UK wage-earners have around £100bn – roughly equivalent to the size of the nation's health budget – less in their pockets today than if the cake were shared as it was in the late 1970s.
In the US, the sum stands at £500bn. There a typical worker would be more than £3,000 better off if the distribution of output between wages and profits had been held at its 1979 level. In the UK, they would earn almost £2,000 more.
The effect of this consolidation of economic power is that the two most effective routes out of the crisis have been closed. First, consumer demand – the oxygen that makes economies work – has been choked off. Rich economies have lost billions of pounds of spending power. Secondly, the slump in demand might be less damaging if the winners from the process of upward redistribution – big business and the top 1% – were playing a more productive role in helping recovery. They are not.
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 08:06 AM | Permalink






















Comments
..."Don't starve the ox that stamps out the grain".... Proverbs something-or-other
Posted by: GareePeters | Feb 8, 2012 9:55:10 AM
It is called a plutonomy, not an economy, and the engine driving it is called a plutocracy, not a democracy.
Posted by: Dredd | Feb 8, 2012 10:17:48 AM
Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows that the war is over
Everybody knows the good guys lost
Everybody knows the fight was fixed
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
That's how it goes
Everybody knows
L. Cohen
Posted by: Nice Nihilist | Feb 8, 2012 10:39:01 AM
I'm reminded of the joke about the smartest man in the world.
http://www.humor5.com/play-11507-Smartest_Man_in_the_World.html
Common sense indicates that wealth at the top depends on those lower on the food chain having enough to keep the system in motion. But as in nature when parasites kill their hosts they move to new ones at the last moment.
I see two fallacies at work.
First, other than in academia, too few understand the difference between economics as a concept versus what many call the real economy. The real economy generates value in the form of goods and/or services. But borrowing and credit generate measurable "income" which is easy to confuse with real value. The same temptation that feeds ponzi schemes leads investors to imagine that when they receive a return they have created something from nothing. Economic alchemy.
Second, thanks to our system of taxes it is natural to confuse net worth with income. Net worth is the full value of existing wealth. Income is the revenue stream from which additional wealth is collected. It is a mistake to imagine that a large income is the equivalent of a large net worth. Sports figures, entertainers, lottery winners and ordinary people who get hold of the right stock at the right time (I'm thinking ground floor employees of companies like Google or Facebook) may have big value and/or incomes, but unless they manage it properly they can fail to accrue a big net worth.
The economy is now filled with examples of people with good, even high incomes whose net worth is at or below zero. Whatever net worth they might have had has been obligated in the form of a mortgage or HELOC, leaving them penniless in the aftermath of the housing bubble.
Economic cycles have historically resolved in one or a combination of ways, none of them pleasant... inflation, deflation or loan "forgiveness" (a vile misnomer from the standpoint of creditors).
Posted by: John Ballard | Feb 8, 2012 3:21:12 PM
http://metanoia-films.org/lifting-the-veil/
Posted by: Louise Gordon | Feb 8, 2012 3:44:45 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik1AK56FtVc
Posted by: Louise Gordon | Feb 8, 2012 3:57:01 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik1AK56FtVc
Posted by: Louise Gordon | Feb 8, 2012 3:58:42 PM
Louise:
Thanks for those links.
Evert aka Adam
Posted by: Evert Cilliers | Feb 8, 2012 10:36:36 PM
And in case that's not enough, check out Matt Taibbi's piece in Rolling Stone responding to something in the New Yorker by Gabriel Sherman.
What Sherman now argues is that Dodd-Frank has so completely hindered Wall Street’s ability to magically invent profits through borrowing and gambling that, unlike those wonderful days in 2009, its fortunes are now reduced to rising and falling – heaven forbid – along with the rest of the economy. Things are so bad, his interview subjects argue, that one is now more likely to make big money going into an actual business that makes an actual product:
"If you’re a smart Ph.D. from MIT, you’d never go to Wall Street now," says a hedge-fund executive. "You’d go to Silicon Valley. There’s at least a prospect for a huge gain. You’d have the potential to be the next Mark Zuckerberg."
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/why-wall-street-should-stop-whining-20120208
Posted by: John Ballard | Feb 9, 2012 5:02:01 AM
Eating my Fabulous Fortune:
http://blinkutopia.com/2011/11/17/eating-my-fabulous-fortune/
Posted by: Jim | Feb 9, 2012 9:51:06 AM
Guardian can publish the truth about the present-day economy... but not the truth about present-day Syria ( http://www.columbia.edu/~hauben/Report_of_Arab_League_Observer_Mission.pdf ).
This suggests a possibility seldom discussed: egalitarianism (of some kind) and imperialistic wars may go hand in hand, serving the same powerful interests.
That's not what I've been taught at school.
Posted by: Levantine | Feb 9, 2012 9:19:54 PM
Western powers are more sophisticated than the Chinese. They have learned that they can allow the truth to come out in books, newspapers and the internet as long as the majority are soaking up Fox news and Rupert Murdock lies.
Posted by: Nice Nihilst | Feb 10, 2012 9:53:45 AM
Post a comment