February 03, 2012
The case for piracy
J. D. Hildebrand in Software Development Times:
SOPA and PIPA are dead. This doesn't mean that pirating software, music, games, and movies online is legal, but that the ability of copyright holders and government agencies to shut down the piracy supply chain remains limited.
The whole Internet community banded together to defeat SOPA and PIPA. We all felt good about protecting free speech in the face of the proposed measures. And it appears that we have won.
So we are left with the status quo. Piracy is still illegal, but it's still common. Copyright holders will continue their search for legal tools to shut down the pipeline. Pirates will continue to use ingenious methods to get their hands on copyrighted works.
What if we are looking at this the wrong way. What if, instead of expending their time and energy stopping piracy, copyright holders accepted the pirates as an inevitable, even helpful, part of the creative ecosystem?
A number of researchers, writers, and even copyright holders are starting to come around to this point of view. In increasing numbers, people are sharing their opinion that piracy is a good thing.
How could this be?
More here.
Posted by Abbas Raza at 01:37 PM | Permalink




















Comments
Maybe begin by stopping to refer to an exchange of information as "piracy."
Posted by: eli | Feb 3, 2012 8:00:02 PM
I think piracy is indeed inevitable if internet is to be kept free. Considering anti-piracy curbs and at the same time hoping this won't curtail internet freedom would be trying to reconcile the two irreconcilable parallels.
Also, piracy may have to be redefined anew. Is file sharing by users on, say, social networks also illegal?
Posted by: Salman Latif | Feb 3, 2012 10:12:46 PM
Post a comment