February 22, 2012
The Art of Distraction
Hanif Kureishi in the New York Times:
If you’re writing and you get stuck, and you then make tea, while waiting for the kettle to boil the chances are good ideas will occur to you. Seeing that a sentence has to have a particular shape can’t be forced; you have to wait for your own judgment to inform you, and it usually does, in time. Some interruptions are worth having if they create a space for something to work in the fertile unconscious. Indeed, some distractions are more than useful; they might be more like realizations and can be as informative and multilayered as dreams. They might be where the excitement is.
You could say that attention needs to be paid to intuition; that one can learn to attend to the hidden self, and there might be something there worth listening to. If the Ritalin boy prefers obedience to creativity, he may be sacrificing his best interests in a way that might infuriate him later. A flighty mind might be going somewhere.
I might have been depressed as a teenager, but I wasn’t beyond enjoying some beautiful distractions. Since my father had parked a large part of his library in my bedroom, when I was bored with studying I would pick up a volume and flip through it until I came upon something that interested me. I ended up finding, more or less randomly, fascinating things while supposedly doing something else. Similarly, while listening to the radio, I became aware of artists and musicians I’d otherwise never have heard of. I had at least learned that if I couldn’t accept education from anyone else, I might just have to feed myself.
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 10:01 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Very helpful post.
Posted by: Dredd | Feb 22, 2012 10:21:47 AM
Why is it helpful, Dredd?
Posted by: Ruchira | Feb 22, 2012 1:32:16 PM
I think it's helpful because it's saying that humans are not meant to be standardized obedient automatons, in many cases, the goal of school classrooms.
Ritalin and similar stimulants stunt kids' growth. Sometimes they keep children awake at night, at which point other drugs can be added to the mix. There have been cases where kids died from the stimulants because they constrict the blood vessels around the heart.
An NIMH meta-study found that after two years, the drugs become ineffective - after many side effects have kicked in.
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/science-news/2009/short-term-intensive-treatment-not-likely-to-improve-long-term-outcomes-for-children-with-adhd.shtml
That article advocates individuality and respect for different learning styles in a conformist world of cookie-cutter people. Um, let's have some more Soma!
Posted by: Louise Gordon | Feb 22, 2012 2:49:29 PM
@ Louise:
I read and reread the article a half dozen times. I cannot match your comment to the results of the study - "An NIMH meta-study found that after two years, the drugs become ineffective - after many side effects have kicked in."
Posted by: Norman Costa | Feb 23, 2012 2:41:59 AM
Getting up to make tea, while being intellectually stuck in the midst of disciplined concentration, is not to mimic the distraction of someone with ADD - Inattentive Type.
Posted by: Norman Costa | Feb 23, 2012 2:53:48 AM
Try this article:
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/science-news/2007/improvement-following-adhd-treatment-sustained-in-most-children.shtml
Posted by: Louise Gordon | Feb 23, 2012 3:17:36 AM
Be sure to monitor Junior's side effects:
http://www.webmd.com/add-adhd/guide/reduce-side-effects-adhd-medications
Posted by: Louise Gordon | Feb 23, 2012 3:24:33 AM
Post a comment