January 19, 2012
more than greed
A new species of book has emerged to tell us about the financial panic and subsequent economic calamity that have befallen the United States (and much of the rest of the world). Some books zero in on a particularly dramatic episode like the spine-tingling final hours leading up to the decision to let Lehman Brothers go under. Others recount the rise or fall of some venerable banking house such as Goldman Sachs or Merrill Lynch and treat these commercial ups and downs as if they were the sagas of grand empires come and gone. Biographical variants gives us the inside dope on titans of finance, invariably men of obsidian hearts and egomaniacal will, undone by their global ambition. Yet another sub-species of this genre, of which Jeff Madrick’s Age of Greed is an example, tries to combine story-telling and profiles of the rich and infamous with a survey and analysis of the whole sorry landscape of financial wilding and how its debaucheries came to be. Melodrama and moral drama supply the oxygen for this new literature. So we have books called Age of Greed, The Greed Merchants, The Big Con, Zombie Capitalism, The Great American Stick-Up, Bad Money, The End of Wall Street, The Banksters, Griftopia. Most of these books share a story line about what happened. An excess of greed nurtured in the highest precincts of the country’s financial establishment and ignored, deliberately or negligently, by those public authorities charged with monitoring and reining in these out-sized appetites, led inexorably to the near terminal breakdown, whose after-shocks reverberate to this day.more from Steve Fraser at Dissent here.
Posted by Morgan Meis at 06:43 AM | Permalink




















Comments
This is an excellent article, but it does give me the impression that 'Marx' is The Name We Dare Not Utter, even when, essentially, it is a marxist analysis one is gesturing at.
Posted by: Chris | Jan 19, 2012 10:55:27 AM
One "staunch republican conservative" goes a bit deeper than Wall Street, to lay the core dynamic on lust, not greed.
The lust for war, which our greatest statesmen have warned us about, is the big brother over greed says Chalmers Johnson: By 1990, the value of the weapons, equipment, and factories devoted to the military was 83% of the value of all plants and equipment in American Manufacturing ... Military industries crowd out the civilian economy ... and lead to severe economic weakness ... US military ... spending ... is more than the entire rest of the world combined ... Devotion to military Keynesianism is, in fact, a form of slow economic suicide ...
I suppose one man's lust is another woman's greed?
Posted by: Dredd | Jan 19, 2012 12:53:49 PM
As an alternative for this book 'the age of greed', I would suggest reading Mark Ames's Going Postal... For the rest, Harvey's Enigma of Capital and Yves Smith's Econned.
Posted by: Foppe | Jan 19, 2012 1:37:37 PM
I highly recommend the movie Margin Call. Jeremy Irons' character says "We'll do it again. We can't help ourselves.". As this article notes, the financial crash was a result of systemic problems. In a better world this experience would be seen as definitive proof that markets are not self regulating.
The Republicans have been the loudest in trumpeting the idea that all is well when government "gets out of the way". As the article notes, the Clinton administration also bears some blame here too.
As, sadly, does the Obama administration for being corrupted by the very people they are supposed to regulate.
Much has been made of the sins of "financial engineers". There is some truth to this since the people running the models did not sufficiently ask whether the answers they were getting made sense.
But one reason that the answers didn't make sense is that the mortgages that were in the bond portfolios were disguised sub-prime mortgages with unprecedented risk. The fact that these mortgages were allowed into the mortgage security stream is, again, an example of a failure of proper market regulation.
There is, actually, a little gendanken experience about unregulated markets. Image that American football were entirely deregulated, with no umpires and nothing to hold the players back. The players would start to maul each other. Then they would start to bring weapons to the "game". Soon it would become televised warfare (which I'm sure would be very popular).
The financial markets have gotten very complicated and the players are very sophisticated. The vast majority of people don't understand what has happened and how specialized finance has gotten. The players have gotten very, very smart. Without an umpire, it gets ugly, as we have seen.
People will use what ever weapons they are allowed to use. Unfortunately in finance the havoc is not limited to the players.
Posted by: Ian Kaplan | Jan 19, 2012 2:55:29 PM
Corporations are not the solution. Corporations are the problem.
Posted by: reader | Jan 19, 2012 3:18:53 PM
Post a comment