| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Forced Merriment: The True Spirit of Christmas | Main | What Love Looks Like »

December 25, 2011

The accidental universe: Science's crisis of faith

Alan P. Lightman in Harper's:

UniverseThe history of science can be viewed as the recasting of phenomena that were once thought to be accidents as phenomena that can be understood in terms of fundamental causes and principles. One can add to the list of the fully explained: the hue of the sky, the orbits of planets, the angle of the wake of a boat moving through a lake, the six-sided patterns of snowflakes, the weight of a flying bustard, the temperature of boiling water, the size of raindrops, the circular shape of the sun. All these phenomena and many more, once thought to have been fixed at the beginning of time or to be the result of random events thereafter, have been explained as necessary consequences of the fundamental laws of nature—laws discovered by human beings. This long and appealing trend may be coming to an end. Dramatic developments in cosmological findings and thought have led some of the world’s premier physicists to propose that our universe is only one of an enormous number of universes with wildly varying properties, and that some of the most basic features of our particular universe are indeed mere accidents—a random throw of the cosmic dice. In which case, there is no hope of ever explaining our universe’s features in terms of fundamental causes and principles.

It is perhaps impossible to say how far apart the different universes may be, or whether they exist simultaneously in time. Some may have stars and galaxies like ours. Some may not. Some may be finite in size. Some may be infinite. Physicists call the totality of universes the “multiverse.” Alan Guth, a pioneer in cosmological thought, says that “the multiple-universe idea severely limits our hopes to understand the world from fundamental principles.” And the philosophical ethos of science is torn from its roots. As put to me recently by Nobel Prize–winning physicist Steven Weinberg, a man as careful in his words as in his mathematical calculations, “We now find ourselves at a historic fork in the road we travel to understand the laws of nature. If the multiverse idea is correct, the style of fundamental physics will be radically changed.”

More here.

Posted by Azra Raza at 07:56 AM | Permalink

Comments

So now we may surmise that 10 to the power of 500 universes may dance upon the head of a pin?

Posted by: Erich | Dec 25, 2011 11:07:42 AM

Great post! To update the Buddhist koan, would our universe exist if we weren't around to see it? Does consciousness play a role in shaping the anthropic universe?

Posted by: Sam | Dec 25, 2011 3:41:14 PM


Not even wrong

Posted by: Dave Ranning | Dec 25, 2011 7:32:51 PM

Disappointing. At the end of the piece Lightman brutalizes the term “faith,” by cross-threading it onto the utterly mismatched pitch of science in that familiar and banal way that conflates for the credulous and their patrons the unequivocal and orthogonal distinctions between the practice of science and theology .

Posted by: secondlaws | Dec 26, 2011 3:40:14 PM

So I suppose the take home message here is that "faith" when you are a scientist is acceptable, but only for scientists?

The older I get the more I realize that Kuhn was spot on. Science is just a series of revolutions, with the theories only able to advance once old practitioners die off.

Posted by: jkc | Jan 3, 2012 3:01:00 PM

The multiverse seems to be the only theory that can explain the fact that we happen to live in a universe perfectly tuned for life. Our existence would seen unlikely, but in a world of infinite possibilities, our existence is actually inevitable.Science appears to be the only way we can get a glimpse of the truth - that there is no god and no purpose and we are a random event. I prefer the truth-driven life to a "purpose-driven life"

Posted by: reader | Jan 3, 2012 3:50:53 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Colette on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Dana on A young Houston couple is planning to give away $4 billion—but only to projects that prove they are worth it. Can they redefine the world of philanthropy?

omar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Dredd on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

omar on Race Is Not Biology

prasad on Race Is Not Biology

JF on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Sundar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

omar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

musafir on Loneliness, isolation and desperate yearning

carlos on The Gut-Wrenching Science Behind the World’s Hottest Peppers

Dredd on A young Houston couple is planning to give away $4 billion—but only to projects that prove they are worth it. Can they redefine the world of philanthropy?

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

JonJ on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

JonJ on Race Is Not Biology

omar on Race Is Not Biology

omar on Race Is Not Biology

Dredd on Race Is Not Biology

Dredd on Race Is Not Biology

allsmiles on A Mother, a Son and a Wife

sverson on Race Is Not Biology

carlos on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

araldo on Race Is Not Biology

jo smith on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Louise Gordon on Why race as a biological construct matters

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed