| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« At home with Osho | Main | Poem »

December 05, 2011

PINA -- a 3D Documentary Film by Wim Wenders

by Randolyn Zinn

Pina_poster
Despite being a fan of Wim Wender’s previous films, I was frankly dubious when I heard about his latest project. Really, I wondered, the work of legendary choreographer Pina Bausch shot in 3D?  Admittedly, my limited experience with this technology was a passing glimpse of computer-generated fantasy fluff for kids…but still, what was Wim Wenders thinking, I wondered?

After seeing the film the other day, I’m pleased to report that Wenders has given a great gift to the world. Not only is PINA one of the first European 3D movies ever made, it is also the world’s first 3D art house film.  Even better, the film brings the work of Pina Bausch to a wider audience. During a good part of its 103 minutes, I felt like I was alongside the dancers, hearing them breathe.  When they leapt, I felt their exhilarating takeoffs and landings in my own body.  When a line of dancers crosses behind a gauzy scrim at one point, it seems to reach into the audience, inviting us to join in the dance. PINA opens in New York on December 23 and will be coming to a theater near you.  Here's the trailer.

PINA - Dance, dance, otherwise we are lost - International Trailer from neueroadmovies on Vimeo.

Wim Wenders and Pina Bausch met in 1985 after the filmmaker saw her piece "Cafe Müller" in Venice.  “There were people performing who moved me as I had never been moved before,” he has said.  “I had a lump in my throat and after a few minutes of unbelieving amazement, I simply let go of my feelings and cried unrestrainedly.  This had never happened to me before.”

Over the course of their 20-year friendship, they dreamed of making a film together, but their amorphous plans soon became a sort of running gag.  Pina would say, “What about doing it now, Wim?”  And he would answer “I still do not know how, Pina!”  Even after studying a variety of dance films, Wenders felt that he didn’t know how to capture the emotional and physical immediacy of Bausch’s tanztheatre, dance theater.  Then he glimpsed the new digital 3D technology. He rushed into the cinema’s lobby to telephone Bausch. “Now I know how to do it, Pina.”

STILL 8(Wim Wenders, Director of PINA. Photo by Donata Wenders. A Sundance Selects release.)

Wenders scheduled the film’s start date in 2009, but on June 30, two days before shooting was to begin, Bausch died unexpectedly.  Everyone was devastated, of course. At 69 years of age and just four days after a diagnosis of cancer, she left behind a son, an acclaimed dance company, devoted fans around the world, and a trove of masterpieces that changed the course of dance and theater history.  The film project stalled, impossible to make without Bausch and Wenders didn’t know how to continue. He had wanted to interview Pina, show her in rehearsal, and, in effect, co-direct the project with her.  The dancers implored him to reconsider.  “In the coming months,” they told him, “ we will perform all the pieces you wanted to record.  You cannot leave us alone.  You must film this.  Now more than ever.” 

The film is structured around stunning performances of “Le Sacre du Printemps”, “Café Müller”, “Kontakthof” and Vollmond”, interspersed with archival rehearsal footage of Bausch, interviews with the dancers and their solos and duets staged in public spaces around Wuppertahl, Germany where the company makes its home, the countryside of the Bergisches Land and the Wuppertal Suspension Line. Excerpts from “Kontakthof” are adroitly intercut in an empty dance hall between its three casts:  the Tanztheater ensemble; ladies and gentlemen between the ages of 65 and 80, and teenagers ages 14+.

STILL 7

(Damiano Ottavio Bigi and Clémentine Deluy in Wim Wenders’ PINA.  ©Neue Road Movies GmbH, Photo by Donata Wenders.  A Sundance Selects release.)

The film doesn’t tear apart the mysterious artistic process that so defined Pina Bausch’s inquiry into life.  Dancing was her medium, but her universal questions crossed cultural boundaries as they probed the human condition.  Bausch created her unusual works by first posing questions to the dancers.  Their improvised “answers” sprung from individual experiences expressed as dances and gesture phrases from which Bausch would slowly develop her evening-length pieces.   As one dancer recounts, “Pina would ask for the moon and I’d answer her with my body.”  What are you longing for, she wanted to know.  “What does all this yearning come from?” As she famously said, “I’m not interested in how people move, but what moves them.”

6a00d8341c562c53ef01287709f1f2970c-350wi
(Pina Bausch in rehearsal.  Photo by Gert Weigelt.)

“You always felt more human working with Pina,” one dancer says. “She let us be sad and furious, to laugh and to cry.”  The experience of making and performing this new hybrid form of tanztheater was so intense that one dancer remembers, “It was as if Pina were hidden inside of each of us.  Or we were a part of her.”

For more on Bausch’s bio, process and choreography, see my article “Somebody Nailed My Dress To The Wall” by clicking HERE. 

Wenders takes on Bausch’s strategy by interviewing company members with questions (that we don’t hear).  As each dancer sits quietly before the camera, his or her spoken answers are overdubbed.  Then in a quick cut, the same dancer is filmed dancing in a public location.  One woman rises on her toes to bourrée on a factory loading platform, a couple engages in a love duet on a busy street corner, another in a forest, a mountain slope, and the Wuppertal Suspended Monorail. 

STILL 2
(Fabian Prioville and Azusa Seyama in Wim Wenders’ PINA. ©Neue Road Movies GmbH, Photo by Donata Wenders.  A Sundance Selects release.)

A strong sense of place has always characterized Wim Wenders’ films.  He has been inspired by the landscapes of Cuba, Los Angles, Tokyo, Cologne  and Paris, Texas, to name just a few.  In PINA when he shoots the outdoor scenes, he puts Bausch’s work into the real-world context that has always been present in her dances.  Her work was about how we live our lives, so to see the dances set in the world makes perfect sense.  The solos and duets outside the theatre space are a perfect complement to the onstage performances. 

DIGITAL 3D: A NEW OPPORTUNITY

In a discussion on June 29, 2010 at the International Film Conference, Wenders said that he wanted his film PINA to replicate the natural perception of space, as when spectators watch before the stage.  “Or better,” he said, “right on it.” 

Apparently the first screen tests for the project were disheartening. If he panned too quickly, he’d get a strobe-like effect.  Any quick movement of a dancer’s arm, for instance, would produce a quick sequence of two, three or four arms.  When he shot at a higher frame rate:  50 frames per second, instead of the standard 24, he got a better, sensational clarity and sense of depth.  But theaters aren’t equipped to run films shot at 50 frames per second.  He appealed to the Institute in America, responsible for the standard, only to discover that they had also denied James Cameron his request to shoot “Avatar” at 50 frames per seconds.

Wenders studied “Avatar” and noticed right away that Cameron had experienced the same problem with multiple images of moving arms and legs, but by cutting quickly and because much of his imagery was computer generated, he was able to cover up the problem.  How to outwit the technology with real people dancing, Wenders wondered?

STILL 1

(Azusa Seyama, Andrey Berezin, dancers of the ensemble of “Sacre du Printemps” in Wim Wenders’ PINA.  ©Neue Road Movies GmbH, Photo by Donata Wenders.  A Sundance Selects release.)

His eventual strategy avoided lens changes so he basically shot the film on 2 focal lengths, both of them quite wide to simulate the angle of natural vision.  “Overall,” he said, “we tried to follow as much as possible the physiology of human eyes.”  In the theater shots, he used a long, telescopic crane stationed in the middle of the auditorium that could penetrate right into the stage between the dancers or rise high above the action. 

In promotional material about the film, Erwin M. Schmidt, the 3D producer said that Wenders and Francois Garnier, the 3D Supervisor of the film, divided the floor plan of the theater space into a virtual checkerboard and used a protractor, which corresponded exactly with the viewing angle of the camera lens.  They studied 2D videos of the dances beforehand and wrote a detailed schedule, noting precisely where on the quadrant the camera should be positioned at any given moment during the performance.  During rehearsals and shootings, the director related these instructions via radio link to the team members. They recorded the four dance pieces live, during sold-out performances.

Understandably, the dancers had qualms at first about the crane: to move with this giant eye dancing along with them onstage?  Normally, dance is shot far from the proscenium. However, dancers are notoriously flexible, and the ensemble soon became acclimated to their new technical partner; the camera literally dances with them and the results are stunning.  The viewer feels as close to the action as if onstage with the dancers. You’ve never been so close. Francois Garnier, the 3D Supervisor says “Because dance is by nature a movement in space, there is no better method than 3D technology to show it.  The sense of physical sensation is much more powerful than than any intellectual reflection.  With 3D, cinema enters a new level.”

Two cameras, one atop the other, were connected by a semi-transparent mirror.  The apparatus was so huge it was operated by many motors.  “A remote controlled monster,” as Wenders put it, that required five people to operate all its functions.  During his second shoot in April, he used a prototype of a Steadycam.  In 3D, the camera must move otherwise the spatial effect is wasted.  “Slow tracking shots pay off wonderfully,” he said” because they move the whole room and make the space more perceptible.

A Quick Lesson in 3D from Erwin Schmidt

To shoot in 3 D you need two cameras mounted either side-by-side or in a so-called mirror rig.  In the latter, cameras are positioned at an angle of 90 degrees.  A one-way mirror is installed in between them, at a 45 degree angle to the two lines of sight.  One camera films through the mirror, the other films its reflection.  The various rigs used on PINA’s set were all prototypes optimized by Alain Derobe especially for this project.

STILL 6
(Dancers of the Pina Bausch Company in Wim Wenders’ PINA.  ©Neue Road Movies GmbH, Photo by Donata Wenders. A Sundance Selects release.)

We loved Pina Bausch.  We miss her.  She died too soon.  Marion Cito, the great costume designer, responsible for all those gorgeous tanztheater gowns, said during filming, “Like many of my colleagues, I sometimes cannot believe that Pina Bausch is no longer here.  The great sadness is still far from over.  One senses, however, that she lives on in her works. I think it’s really great that Wenders is shooting the movie now, because Pina wanted this very much.” 

I think so too.  Danke, Wim Wenders.

The Dancers:  Regina Advento, Malou Aiaudo, Ruth Amarante, Jorge Puerta Armenta, Pina Bausch, Rainer Behr, Andrey Berezin, Damiano Ottavio Bigi, Ales Cucek, Clementine Deluy, Josephine Ann Endicott, Lutz Forster, Pablo Aran Gimeno, Mechtild Grosmann, Silvia Farias Heredia, Barbara Kaufmann, Nayoung Kim, Daphnis Kokkinos, Ed Kortlandt, Eddie Martinez, Dominique Mercy, Ditta Miranda Jasjfi, Cristiana Morganti, Morena Nascimento, Nazareth Panadero, Helena Pikon, Fabien Prioville, Jean-Laurent Sasportes, Franko Schmidt, Azusa Seyama, Julie Shanahan, Julie Anne Stanzak, Michael Strecker, Fernando Suels Mendoza, Aida Vainieri, Anna Wehsarg, Tsai-Chin Yu and as guests in "Le Sacre du printemps":  Alexeider Abad Gonzales, Sephan Brinkmann, Meritxell Checa Esteban, Paul Hess, Rudolf Giglberger Chrystel Wu Guillebeaud, Mu-Yi Kuo, Szu-Wei Wu, Tomoko Yamashita, Sergey Zhukov, Andy Zondag.

Posted by Randolyn Zinn at 12:25 AM | Permalink

Comments

I would also like to acknowledge the Brooklyn Academy of Music for providing an American home for Pina Bausch's work.

Posted by: Randolyn Zinn | Dec 5, 2011 11:22:19 AM

Thank you, Randolyn Zinn!
For a bird's eye view into the technical and emotional journey of this film.
What an amazing collaboration of art/ passion/ loss and discovery.

Posted by: bernadette sullivan | Dec 5, 2011 11:22:33 AM

I am lucky enough to have seen a number of Pina's works on stage and am looking forward with anticipation to seeing this film. I am not very familiar w/ 3D and was somewhat skeptical of its use in this project, but this article has stirred my interest.
Zinn's description of how the shots were broken down in advance and the resulting oneness with the dancers is exciting, as theatre/ dance films are generally flat and don't capture the sense of 'thereness' we get inside a theatre.
thanks

Posted by: Jordan | Dec 5, 2011 11:59:26 AM

Can't wait to see this! Thank you for the heads-up and thank you for the fascinating technical information. The author's previous article in the link is amazingly good.

Posted by: L Mead | Dec 5, 2011 12:00:57 PM

Not only is PINA one of the first European 3D movies ever made, it is also the world’s first 3D art house film.

Herzog's 3D "Cave of Forgotten Dreams" came out last year. It was both European and an art house film. Just saying.

Posted by: picador | Dec 5, 2011 12:43:39 PM

Wonderful article, Randolyn! I can't wait to see this...

Posted by: Lori Romero | Dec 5, 2011 1:27:51 PM

To the author: This is a great follow-up to your earlier article about Pina Bausch, that I enjoyed so much. I'm not a dancer, but your articles always give me a sense of what it might be like to view the world as one. (I love the piece you wrote about Flamenco for this reason.) Your dancer's observations, along with the really interesting explanations of how Wenders and company made 3D work for this project, make me even more excited to see the film.

Posted by: Kate | Dec 5, 2011 2:14:42 PM

Picador beat me to it, but I too was going to point out that Werner Herzog made a 3D European art house film last year.
As my journalism instructors always reminded me: Never claim something is the first, you'll inevitably be wrong.

Posted by: Mindy | Dec 5, 2011 3:07:00 PM

Good point, Minday and PIcador. FYI, the press materials on Wenders' film distributed at the screening I saw last week include the "art house" claim that I used in my article. In any case, don't let this detail prevent you from seeing this marvelous film.

Posted by: Randolyn Zinn | Dec 5, 2011 3:22:05 PM

Fascinating and wonderful

Posted by: kate Fincke | Dec 5, 2011 8:37:48 PM

What a wonderful article, Randolyn -- we should all go as a gaggle to the film. Thanks so much!

Posted by: Elatia Harris | Dec 6, 2011 2:11:23 AM

Wonderful and insightful article. I particularly found interesting the difficulties Wenders faced when trying to capture the dancing in 3D and how he was able to circumvent these issues. I'm desperate and very excited to see the movie especially after reading this review. For those that have seen it, how much "punch" do you think the movie will lose in 2D?

Posted by: chuck pfaff | Dec 6, 2011 10:07:56 AM

Thank you for the great article, Randolyn. I would join the gaggle, Elatia.

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Dec 6, 2011 9:54:42 PM

That was fascinating. 3D should make a huge difference in the affect but who would have thought of such a thing!!

Posted by: Karen Swenson | Dec 8, 2011 11:00:14 AM

To my amazement, this wonderful film was shown on a transatlantic Swissair flight in October. Although in 2D and on a small screen, it was still one of the most moving film experiences I have ever had; and I watched it through three times!

Your review is excellent, Randolyn.

Posted by: Christopher Burge | Dec 8, 2011 11:01:19 AM

Wenders and Bausch, what a pairing. Fascinating description of the filming techniques and a heartening voice for dogged pursuit of the highest artistic standards. Great, great article. So glad there is such intelligent writing about dance.

Posted by: Jennifer | Dec 8, 2011 4:47:16 PM

What a terrific article. I'm really looking forward to seeing this film.

Posted by: Brett Paesel | Dec 10, 2011 11:35:29 AM

Fascinating review, I can't wait to see the movie and as always with Randolyn's writing, I now understand an aspect of the craft that no other reviewer (that I've encountered) has explained - this time, just how a 3D film is made. Looking forward to seeing it.

Posted by: Karen Trott | Dec 14, 2011 11:21:49 PM

so great. cant wait to see this! i miss seeing Pina Bausch at BAM

Posted by: Leslie Mason | Mar 5, 2012 2:25:18 PM

In an earlier piece about Pina Bausch Randolyn Zinn quoted Bausch as saying, "I like people who are difficult to open." I have somewhat the same feeling about essays. I like them best when they make demands on the reader before releasing their charge. Never before have I read anything about dance that expresses as convincingly the spirit and style of a dancer --- in this case a dancer I have not ever seen. To combine it with insights into the technology of filmmaking is a valuable addition. This is a splendid article.

Posted by: Ralph Caplan | Mar 5, 2012 3:44:50 PM

What a gorgeous article, illuminating even more a luminous film. xom

Posted by: Martin Moran | Mar 6, 2012 8:36:27 AM

Reading the whole story of the realization of this movie, it seems that Randolyn has left the realm of prosaic paper-flat criticism and elevated insight into an airy illuminated 3D visualization. She has understood how to scribe
Pina's dream -- to search not for how we-people move, but what moves us.

Posted by: JAne F.M.T. | Mar 6, 2012 11:20:22 AM

Thank you Randolyn, for such a thorough and compelling article. I want to learn even more now! Can't wait to see it.

Posted by: Christi Shannon Kline | Mar 6, 2012 12:16:46 PM

Yes, thank you Randolyn, for the great review! This is not only written with passion, understanding, it is also very well researched. This article gives a great inside in to the subject and in to the challenges even a accomplished filmmaker like Wim Wenders faces, to find the best way to translate a complex emotional experience and an Idea in to a visual medium. I am a fan, but this article enriches my knowledge and experience even after I have seen the movie....

Posted by: mica hubertus mick | Mar 7, 2012 4:41:52 PM

Great to see Pina getting some publicity.

Posted by: Freedle | Mar 8, 2012 9:19:40 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

dthoko on The History of Typography - Animated Short

Richard on John Gray’s Godless Mysticism

Abbas Raza on Why Steven Pinker Is Wrong

nogodrod on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Bill on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

j_93 on Gezi Park

j_93 on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Norman Costa on The Insanity Virus

Dave Ranning on Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations

Sundar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Sundar on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

gaddeswarup on What is ‘smart’ and how does it fit our consciousness?

musafir on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Lusine on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on Gezi Park

Raza Husain on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

Brad Wilson on The Insanity Virus

billy on Syria: Inventing a Religious War

rafiq on The Insanity Virus

Ben Schwartz on Here He Goes Again: Sam Harris’s Falsehoods

JonJ on Moving books

musafir on My Father: A Veteran's Story – Part 2

omar on Quest for 'Genius Babies'?

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed