December 27, 2011
Physics on the Fringe
Michael D. Gordin in American Scientist:
Many people enjoy doing physics, and the vast majority of them work as professional scientists. Margaret Wertheim’s Physics on the Fringe, however, is about the minority, those who devote a significant portion of their lives to investigating the structure of the universe at their kitchen tables while their families sleep. These individuals (those she discusses are, with one exception, all men) did not train as scientists and then fail to find employment in their chosen field. And they are not amateurs who study physics textbooks and read scholarly journals. They are at the fringe, a place most of us ignore completely.
That is because the fringe is, well, fringy. Among Wertheim’s protagonists are those who deny quantum mechanics, postulate new structures for atoms, revive the ether or reject special relativity, and just about all of them despise general relativity. They self-publish their theories—sometimes they just photocopy handwritten manuscripts—and circulate them among scientists worldwide, who usually end up tossing them in the wastebasket. Wertheim, an accomplished science writer, has collected such texts for years now and sympathetically narrates many of them for us. Such ephemera are very hard to come by, given their frequent encounters with the trash heap, and her archival efforts are to be lauded (as is the renewed attention she brings to mathematician Augustus De Morgan’s delightful 1872 book, A Budget of Paradoxes, which catalogs the rejectamenta of the science of his day). She wants us to take these “outsider physicists” seriously, not as a kooky cultural phenomenon, but as people actually doing science in a way that demands as much attention from mainstream science as folk art now claims from the elite art community.
More here.
Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 11:30 AM | Permalink






















Comments
Agreed!
Give Roger Penrose a chance! Give Freeman Dyson a chance!
Posted by: Dredd | Dec 27, 2011 1:55:00 PM
Yeah, and give people like the Time Cube guy more validity. Science isn't art. It requires plenty of skepticism and research, things that the fringe scientists lack. What we need is more funding for established science so that more people with PhDs will have incentive to do research rather than work in finance.
Posted by: Bob | Dec 27, 2011 11:50:45 PM
Um, is Dredd joking? Penrose and Dyson are the exact opposite of outsiders. I went to school for physics, and I know why we take them much more seriously than we should the "outsider scientists": they understand what it is they disagree with about scientific topics. I've seen plenty of crackpot manuscripts (we'd keep them in the physics lounges to make fun of), and that's basically the problem. If you want to revive ether, hate general relativity, present new theories of atoms, that's great--just not if you're doing it instead of understanding the theories that have taken millions of painstaking man-hours for some of the world's smartest people to construct. A criticism from ignorance is very weak.
Posted by: David Kordahl | Dec 28, 2011 12:41:27 AM
Post a comment