November 30, 2011
The Crises of Democratic Capitalism
Wolfgang Streeck in New Left Review:
The collapse of the American financial system that occurred in 2008 has since turned into an economic and political crisis of global dimensions. How should this world-shaking event be conceptualized? Mainstream economics has tended to conceive society as governed by a general tendency toward equilibrium, where crises and change are no more than temporary deviations from the steady state of a normally well-integrated system. A sociologist, however, is under no such compunction. Rather than construe our present affliction as a one-off disturbance to a fundamental condition of stability, I will consider the ‘Great Recession’ and the subsequent near-collapse of public finances as a manifestation of a basic underlying tension in the political-economic configuration of advanced-capitalist societies; a tension which makes disequilibrium and instability the rule rather than the exception, and which has found expression in a historical succession of disturbances within the socio-economic order. More specifically, I will argue that the present crisis can only be fully understood in terms of the ongoing, inherently conflictual transformation of the social formation we call ‘democratic capitalism’.
Democratic capitalism was fully established only after the Second World War and then only in the ‘Western’ parts of the world, North America and Western Europe. There it functioned extraordinarily well for the next two decades—so well, in fact, that this period of uninterrupted economic growth still dominates our ideas and expectations of what modern capitalism is, or could and should be. This is in spite of the fact that, in the light of the turbulence that followed, the quarter century immediately after the war should be recognizable as truly exceptional. Indeed I suggest that it is not the trente glorieuses but the series of crises which followed that represents the normal condition of democratic capitalism—a condition ruled by an endemic conflict between capitalist markets and democratic politics, which forcefully reasserted itself when high economic growth came to an end in the 1970s. In what follows I will first discuss the nature of that conflict and then turn to the sequence of political-economic disturbances that it produced, which both preceded and shaped the present global crisis.
Posted by Robin Varghese at 03:44 AM | Permalink






















Comments
"How should this world-shaking event be conceptualized?"
How about cluster
f**kcrime?Concurrent with it is growing fascism in the U.S., which is not surprising.
For example the U.S. Senate just passed a bill that will allow American citizens merely accused of being a terrorist on American soil to be put indefinitely in Gitmo and held without formal charges or trial.
Seriously!
Posted by: Dredd | Nov 30, 2011 12:08:30 PM
What a waste of time. Not "wrong" per se, but too opaque, with the author daring only to offer a few veiled criticisms. I guess this is news if you've been in a coma for the past 30 years, but I didn't find one insightful point inhere that I haven't already seen said elsewhere a dozen times over.
Go read David Harvey in stead; far more accessible, and far more likely to make you understand the trends.
Posted by: Foppe | Nov 30, 2011 12:14:29 PM
Things regress to the mean. Means move. The market-place of ideas determines conditions in the labor market. Commie's lose, Capitalists win; Capitalist change their offer in the market-place. The point of equalibrium has moved. The trade off remains the same, freedom vs fairness. To the death, but of course the capitalists use trusts that never die.
Posted by: Frank in midtown | Dec 1, 2011 1:02:00 AM
Post a comment