November 06, 2011
A Brief Guide to Embodied Cognition: Why You Are Not Your Brain
Samuel McNerney over at a guest post at one of Scientific American's blogs:
Embodied cognition, the idea that the mind is not only connected to the body but that the body influences the mind, is one of the more counter-intuitive ideas in cognitive science. In sharp contrast is dualism, a theory of mind famously put forth by Rene Descartes in the 17th century when he claimed that “there is a great difference between mind and body, inasmuch as body is by nature always divisible, and the mind is entirely indivisible… the mind or soul of man is entirely different from the body.” In the proceeding centuries, the notion of the disembodied mind flourished. From it, western thought developed two basic ideas: reason is disembodied because the mind is disembodied and reason is transcendent and universal. However, as George Lakoff and Rafeal Núñez explain:
Cognitive science calls this entire philosophical worldview into serious question on empirical grounds… [the mind] arises from the nature of our brains, bodies, and bodily experiences. This is not just the innocuous and obvious claim that we need a body to reason; rather, it is the striking claim that the very structure of reason itself comes from the details of our embodiment… Thus, to understand reason we must understand the details of our visual system, our motor system, and the general mechanism of neural binding.
What exactly does this mean? It means that our cognition isn’t confined to our cortices. That is, our cognition is influenced, perhaps determined by, our experiences in the physical world. This is why we say that something is “over our heads” to express the idea that we do not understand; we are drawing upon the physical inability to not see something over our heads and the mental feeling of uncertainty. Or why we understand warmth with affection; as infants and children the subjective judgment of affection almost always corresponded with the sensation of warmth, thus giving way to metaphors such as “I’m warming up to her.”
Embodied cognition has a relatively short history. Its intellectual roots date back to early 20th century philosophers Martin Heidegger, Maurice Merleau-Ponty and John Dewey and it has only been studied empirically in the last few decades. One of the key figures to empirically study embodiment is University of California at Berkeley professor George Lakoff.
Lakoff was kind enough to field some questions over a recent phone conversation, where I learned about his interesting history first hand.
Posted by Robin Varghese at 04:47 PM | Permalink






















Comments
If this is true, then Transhumanists will have a surprise waiting for them when they upload their conciousnesses into something other than human bodies.
Imagine uploading your conciousness into a perfect sphere that has all five senses operating in all directions.
Will you still understand left and right? Up and down? Forward and backward?
Will you understand male and female? Ethnicity? Nationality?
Maybe some of these categories are ones that we should shed, but they are definitely categories that affect our current judgments as human beings.
They won't be categories that affect the future decision of spheroids floating in the abyss of space.
Posted by: DAS | Nov 6, 2011 10:39:43 PM
Transhumanists might argue that we can simulate the whole body.
But I think, this would be a rather complex undertaking. There is a significant amount of interaction between heart and brain, which is bidirectional. There is the whole range of sensations generated by the overall body. All of this contributes to an emotional fabric, which is crucial in decision making.
I certainly will not volunteer to be the first embodied in an electronic simulacrum purely based on the brain... likely to be a rather flat and miserable experience.
Posted by: Harald Striepe | Nov 7, 2011 8:09:12 PM
Post a comment