| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« How to Read Moby-Dick | Main | Notes from a Nobody Comic Writer »

October 24, 2011

The dog ate my homework

by Sarah Firisen

So let's talk about college. Or to be more specific, let's have a look at how prepared our children are go to college. And I'm not talking about their academic readiness, though clearly many, many words could be devoted to that. I'm talking about their work habits.

ScreenHunter_09 Oct. 24 10.16My 11-year old daughter, Anya, just entered middle school. If you're even an occasional reader, you'll know that my children go to a small, independent progressive school - the Robert C. Parker school. A conscious, intentional part of both the run-up to middle school in 5th grade and of 6th and 7th grade is to teach the children how to engage in independent study. The purpose of homework, which Anya didn't really get in any meaningful, regular way up until 5th grade, is less about what she learns, and more about how she learns to study. It's about learning to be organized enough that she makes sure she leaves class with all the information she needs to work at home; that she brings the right books and papers with her; that she learns how to prioritize the workload she has - start with the homework due tomorrow, not the work due in three days.

By public school standards, Anya's homework load is still light; if she doesn't procrastinate too much, she can usually easily get it done in an hour a night, and there are still nights when she doesn't have any. Anya, rather like her mother, isn't the most organized or tidy person; there have been some real struggles as she learns to make sure she has her school bag packed with the right materials at the end of the day. And then, she has to remember to take her homework back into school the next morning. But, week by week,  she's making progress.

I remember when I was in school in London; it was a private school, but a large rather formal establishment, far removed from the philosophy of my children's school. When we forgot our homework or hadn't done it, we would have to wait outside the teachers' lounge (we weren't allowed to knock on the door) until another teacher walked by. We would then have to catch her eye (it was a girls' school and 99.99% of the teachers were female), and then plead "Mrs Jones, Mrs Jones, can you ask Mrs Smith to come out?) If we were lucky, Mrs Jones would see Mrs Smith and remember to tell her. I sometimes spent entire mid-morning breaks waiting outside of that teachers' lounge.

When Mrs Smith finally came out, I had to do my best to sound convincing and sympathetic in my excuses for why my homework wasn't being handed in that day. Despite the not insignificant school fees my parents paid to send me there, I don't remember anyone actually taking the time to help me develop better, more organized, more efficient working habits. Instead, I would be told off because my work wasn't done.

Anya gets called out on her work habits as well; her teachers have contacted me to tell me that her homework hasn't been done, or hasn't been done to the level they know she's capable of. But, we then work together, the teachers, Anya, myself and my husband, to try to come up with better strategies to help her get back on track. These strategies include making a point of praising her, at school and home, when she does exhibit the work habits we're all trying to inculcate in her.

I'm bringing this up because of a column by Gail Collins in the New York Times this week that talks about the work habits of college kids. It quotes a well-known study, Academically Adrift, that  "followed 3,000 students on 29 campuses and determined that after two years, 45 percent showed no significant gain in learning — and even after four years, 36 percent showed little change." The study goes on to find that, "that 36 percent of the students are studying five or fewer hours a week and get a 3.16 grade average.ā€

These are some pretty scary statistics, particularly when you consider how much these students and/or their parents are paying for college these days, " This year, the total amount of outstanding student loans will pass the $1 trillion threshold for the first time". Beyond the cost, let's not forget how badly, as a country, we need thisgeneration and the ones behind them to be raising their game and leaving college with significant skills. Collins goes on to quote the author of the study, Richard Arum, who points out that current work habits aren't going to cut it in a global economy. In this new world of increasing Chinese dominance (to say nothing of India and beyond), the US can't afford these kinds of work habits in such a significant percentage of its graduating college students.

And these work habits can't be newly acquired for the most part; these young adult have probably gone through their elementary, middle and high school years being taught, as I was, that the actual subject matter was the sole point of the homework rather than also a way to work on independent study, work habits and organizational skills. It turns out that how children learn is as important as what they learn. My children's school spends a lot of time working with the children to help them become invested, self-motivated learners. What we hear back from alumni is that this kind of learning environment makes a huge difference when they move onto high school and then college and find themselves increasingly free to make decisions about how, when and where they study.

College should be a place for self-discovery, developing maturity and fun. But we need it to be more if our graduates are to compete effectively in the new global economy. And if they don't have the right work habits in college to support this, perhaps we should think about making changes far earlier in their lives.

Posted by Sarah Firisen at 12:05 AM | Permalink

Comments

I have gone to graduate school decades after my undergrad degree in science. I think that the questions that you discuss are complex.

I think of graduate school as "fear based learning". The work load is very large and the pace is fast and I constantly fear getting below a B (e.g., failing my class). My view of college, both from years ago when I got my undergrad degree and now, is that college is about passing tests. Learning is a side effect. So to try to measure college student's "learning" seems questionable. The truth is, students are in college to pass tests and get grades, not necessarily to learn. And students concentrate on what's important.

I will also note that my master's program has a strong mathematical focus and most of the class is from Asia. Asian students far outnumber Caucasian students.

At least from my experience as an undergrad and in graduate school, I don't see how you can survive without some study skills. My undergrad school was obsessed with the idea of grade inflation and the average really was a C. I don't know what it's like now. In grad school the average is probably at least a B, because any other grade is a failing grade. But you definitely work for that A or B.

Posted by: Ian Kaplan | Oct 24, 2011 1:57:30 PM

An alternative viewpoint from Alfie Kohn:


Alfie Kohn, Topics for Educators

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Oct 24, 2011 2:30:32 PM

Thank you for the article. I really liked it

Posted by: Jorge Contreras | Oct 25, 2011 1:59:50 PM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Abbas Raza on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Jonathan on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Bill on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Louise Gordon on The need for critical science journalism

omar on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

Jonathan on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Bill on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

jo smith on Mohsin Hamid: 'Islam is not a monolith'

carlos on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

freddie on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

Eli on "Everybody Hurts" by Sachal Studios, Lahore, Pakistan

Jalees Rehman on The need for critical science journalism

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Scrutineer on Why race as a biological construct matters

prasad on the culture animal

Mitt Romney's Dog on Why race as a biological construct matters

Elatia Harris on The Moral Status of Rocks

prasad on The Moral Status of Rocks

Raza Husain on The Moral Status of Rocks

Fred on Unknown Mathematician Proves Elusive Property of Prime Numbers

Joel Grant on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Tomboktu on Why is Europe so Messed Up? An Illuminating History

Joe on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

Jalees Rehman on The Science Mystique

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed