| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Creating Capabilities | Main | Religion Makes People Happy, So Why is Church Attendance Declining? »

October 05, 2011

Richard Feynman on Beauty

Part 1 of the Feynman Series, via io9:

Posted by Robin Varghese at 12:41 AM | Permalink

Comments

This is an extremely heartfelt description of beauty by one of our best thinkers !

Even though I wholly agree with Feynman's point of view, I would like to add that there is the element of habit that might pertain to beauty. As he says, the aesthetic beauty of the flower is available to the human any time he so wishes. Yet, the scientist might be so habituated to scientific way of thinking that it may become hard for him or her to sort of suspend that mode while experiencing the beauty of the flower.

I believe that the human brain has qualitatively different modes of thought and even experience. And, it is to the imbalance in using these modes that I would react to if I were to take Feynman's artist friend's side of the argument.

Posted by: Sumiran | Oct 5, 2011 7:39:13 PM

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and is only skin deep.

A family of deer in the backyard is fun to watch but the fun ceases when they eat your garden or are so plentiful you can't get your car out of the garage or if they jump into your windshield when you leave home and destroy your car and possibly kill the riders.

Trees are beautiful and do much good for the environment but when they are near buildings and drop leaves or acorns or other debris which clog up rain gutters causing damage to roofs and foundations, or blow down destroying your house in a windstorm, they lose some of their beauty too.

Water is a very beautiful and necessary substance to sustain life but if there is too much of it or it has too much salt in it and cannot be consumed, it loses its luster too. "Water water everywhere but not a drop to drink". And when water destroys buildings as a universal solvent, it isn't a pretty sight and can be very costly to owners.

Birds are beautiful and fun to watch but when your car is covered with bird droppings after having been parked under a tree or a plane crashes due to birds flying into the engines, they are not so pretty are they?

The laws of physics are very beautiful when they are properly used for the benefit of mankind but not so pretty when they are used to blow up the earth or corrupted.

There are two sides to everything in nature and life.
This is sort of a general extension of the action principle in physics. "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".

Posted by: W.J.Abbe | Oct 6, 2011 4:51:47 AM

Post a comment






Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

G on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Erich on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

omar on Race Is Not Biology

Raza Husain on Race Is Not Biology

Raza Husain on Race Is Not Biology

Josef Stern on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Colette on POETRY IN TRANSLATION: CORDOBA

Dana on A young Houston couple is planning to give away $4 billion—but only to projects that prove they are worth it. Can they redefine the world of philanthropy?

omar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Dredd on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

omar on Race Is Not Biology

prasad on Race Is Not Biology

JF on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

Sundar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

omar on REFLECTIONS ON WOOLWICH

musafir on Loneliness, isolation and desperate yearning

carlos on The Gut-Wrenching Science Behind the World’s Hottest Peppers

Dredd on A young Houston couple is planning to give away $4 billion—but only to projects that prove they are worth it. Can they redefine the world of philanthropy?

Dredd on Why Rational People Buy Into Conspiracy Theories

JonJ on Daniel Dennett's seven tools for thinking

JonJ on Race Is Not Biology

omar on Race Is Not Biology

omar on Race Is Not Biology

Dredd on Race Is Not Biology

Dredd on Race Is Not Biology

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed