| ABOUT US | ARCHIVES | LINKS | RSS FEED | MONDAYS | |

3quarksdaily

An Eclectic Digest of Science, Art and Literature

« Moving Beyond the “Melting Pot” | Main | The New Generation of Microbe Hunters »

August 29, 2011

Patricia Churchland to Judge 3rd Annual 3QD Philosophy Prize

UPDATE 9/19/11: The winners have been announced here.

UPDATE 9/13/11: The list of finalists can be seen here.

UPDATE 9/12/11: The list of semifinalists can be seen here.

UPDATE 9/6/11: Voting round now open. Click here to see full list of nominees and vote.

Dear Readers, Writers, Bloggers,

Patricia-churchland-258x258 We are very honored and pleased to announce that Professor Patricia Churchland has agreed to be the final judge for our 3rd annual prize for the best blog writing in philosophy. (Details of the inaugural prize, judged by Daniel C. Dennett, can be found here, and more about last year's prize, judged by Akeel Bilgrami can be found here.)

The following biographical sketch is from Professor Churchland's Wikipedia entry:

Patricia Smith Churchland (born July 16, 1943 in Oliver, British Columbia, Canada) is a Canadian-American philosopher noted for her contributions to neurophilosophy and the philosophy of mind. She has been a Professor at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) since 1984. Since 1999 she has been UC President's Professor of Philosophy at UCSD, and has held an adjunct professorship at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies since 1989. Educated at the University of British Columbia, the University of Pittsburgh, and the University of Oxford (B.Phil.). She taught philosophy at the University of Manitoba from 1969 to 1984 and is the wife of philosopher Paul Churchland.

9780262530859-f30 On her own website, Professor Churchland describes her work as follows:

The central focus of my research has been the exploration and development of the hypothesis that the mind is the brain. My first book, Neurophilosophy (1986), argued in detail for a co-evolution of psychology, philosophy and neuroscience to answer questions about how the mind represents, reasons, decides and perceives. A major unanswered question in Neurophilosophy concerned the theoretical apparatus needed to bridge the gap between lower and higher levels of brain organization. I turned to this task in 1987, and began to collaborate with Terry Sejnowski on the book The Computational Brain (MIT 1992).

Patricia Churchland won a MacArthur ("Genius") Award in 1991. She has also served as president of the American Philosophical Association (Pacific Division) and the Society for Philosophy and Psychology.

As usual, this is the way it will work: the nominating period is now open, and will end at 11:59 pm EDT on Spetember 5, 2011. There will then be a round of voting by our readers which will narrow down the entries to the top twenty semi-finalists. After this, we will take these top twenty voted-for nominees, and the four main editors of 3 Quarks Daily (Abbas Raza, Robin Varghese, Morgan Meis, and Azra Raza) will select six finalists from these, plus they may also add up to three wildcard entries of their own choosing. The three winners will be chosen from these by Professor Churchland.

The first place award, called the "Top Quark," will include a cash prize of one thousand dollars; the second place prize, the "Strange Quark," will include a cash prize of three hundred dollars; and the third place winner will get the honor of winning the "Charm Quark," along with a two hundred dollar prize.

(Welcome to those coming here for the first time. Learn more about who we are and what we do here, and do check out the full site here. Bookmark us and come back regularly, or sign up for the RSS feed.)

Details:

PrizePhilosophyAnnounce2011 The winners of this philosophy prize will be announced on September 19, 2011. Here's the schedule:

August 29, 2011:

  • The nominations are opened. Please nominate your favorite philosophy blog entry by placing the URL for the blog post (the permalink) in the comments section of this post. You may also add a brief comment describing the entry and saying why you think it should win. (Do NOT nominate a whole blog, just one individual blog post.)
  • Blog posts longer than 4,000 words are strongly discouraged, but we might make an exception if there is something truly extraordinary.
  • Each person can only nominate one blog post.
  • Entries must be in English.
  • The editors of 3QD reserve the right to reject entries that we feel are not appropriate.
  • The blog entry may not be more than a year old. In other words, it must have been written after August 28, 2010.
  • You may also nominate your own entry from your own or a group blog (and we encourage you to).
  • Guest columnists at 3 Quarks Daily are also eligible to be nominated, and may also nominate themselves if they wish.
  • Nominations are limited to the first 200 entries.
  • Prize money must be claimed within a month of the announcement of winners.

September 5, 2011

  • The nominating process will end at 11:59 PM (NYC time) of this date.
  • The public voting will be opened soon afterwards.

September 11, 2011

  • Public voting ends at 11:59 PM (NYC time).

September 19, 2011

  • The winners are announced.

One Final and Important Request

If you have a blog or website, please help us spread the word about our prizes by linking to this post. Otherwise, post a link on your Facebook profile, Tweet it, or just email your friends and tell them about it! I really look forward to reading some very good material, and think this should be a lot of fun for all of us.

Best of luck and thanks for your attention!

Yours,

Abbas

Posted by S. Abbas Raza at 01:00 AM | Permalink

Comments

Morality vs Ethics: The Trolley Problem

http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2010/10/morality-vs-ethics.html

Posted by: Thomas Wells | Aug 29, 2011 5:17:40 AM

More on phenomena

http://evolvingthoughts.net/2011/06/more-on-phenomena/

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | Aug 29, 2011 7:01:11 AM

Churchland. Um.

Well, no better occasion for me to get started on my post, "To Hell With Philosophy, Let's Just Do Neuroscience." The money is mine, suckers.

Posted by: Joe | Aug 29, 2011 11:23:49 AM

David Benatar's No life is good.

Posted by: Rob | Aug 29, 2011 12:04:30 PM

Amanda Silbernagel (The Philosophy of Poetry): The Glimpse of Recognition

http://www.amandasilbernagel.com/?p=2167

Posted by: Jaime | Aug 29, 2011 12:13:57 PM

"Disgust, Magical Thinking, and Morality"

http://theconsternationofphilosophy.blogspot.com/2011/05/disgust-magical-thinking-and-morality.html

Posted by: Matt Hoberg | Aug 29, 2011 12:33:58 PM

"The Puzzle of the Self-Torturer"

http://www.philosophyetc.net/2011/04/puzzle-of-self-torturer.html

Posted by: Richard Yetter Chappell | Aug 29, 2011 1:14:42 PM

"Has Molyneux's Question Been Answered?"

http://philosophyofbrains.com/2011/08/29/has-molyneuxs-question-been-answered.aspx

Posted by: John | Aug 29, 2011 1:20:48 PM

Luke Muehlhauser

"The Goal of Philosophy..."

http://commonsenseatheism.com/?p=13737

Posted by: Ted Sandoval | Aug 29, 2011 4:14:44 PM

"An Old Man From Jersey Explains Philosophy"

http://wisesloth.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/an-old-man-from-jersey-explains-philosophy/

Posted by: Travis | Aug 29, 2011 4:18:48 PM

I offer:

http://tomkow.typepad.com/tomkowcom/2011/03/self-defense.html

Posted by: tomkow | Aug 29, 2011 4:41:19 PM

The Visiting Fellows Paradox

http://laser.fontmonkey.com/foe/index.php?entry=A-paradox-arises-over-beer

Posted by: P.D. | Aug 29, 2011 4:42:10 PM

Here is an interesting one by Doulgas Groothuis, PhD:

"The Empathy Machine":

http://theconstructivecurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2011/07/empathy-machine-unfinished-essay.html

Posted by: Albert | Aug 29, 2011 5:01:47 PM

Please consider:

http://vihvelin.typepad.com/vihvelincom/2011/05/two-objections-to-the-possibility-of-time-travel.html

Posted by: Kadri Vihvelin | Aug 29, 2011 5:03:33 PM

"Merry Christmas, or, Ryle's Idiotic Idea":

http://specterofreason.blogspot.com/2010/12/merry-christmas-or-ryles-idiotic-idea.html

Posted by: Jason Streitfeld | Aug 29, 2011 5:24:07 PM

Good luck Patricia.

Tough job!

Posted by: Dredd | Aug 29, 2011 8:17:04 PM

"Sketch of a Way of Thinking about Modality, part 1".

http://sprachlogik.blogspot.com/2011/06/sketch-of-way-of-thinking-about.html

Posted by: Tristan Haze | Aug 29, 2011 9:42:54 PM

Terrance Tomkow, "Trolley Problems" http://tomkow.typepad.com/tomkowcom/2011/04/trolleyproblems.html

Posted by: David Gordon | Aug 29, 2011 9:45:31 PM

"Art, Ethics and Christmas"

http://yeahokbutstill.blogspot.com/2010/12/art-ethics-and-christmas.html

Posted by: Nick Smyth | Aug 29, 2011 11:16:41 PM

From Rust Belt Philosophy -

Spoken like a man who's never been poor

http://rustbeltphilosophy.blogspot.com/2011/08/spoken-like-man-whos-never-been-poor.html

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Aug 29, 2011 11:27:15 PM

Travis,

Your link leads to an error message.

Posted by: Louise Gordon | Aug 29, 2011 11:42:05 PM

I nominate Dave Shoemaker's "Scanlon on Blame, Part 3: Criminal Blame and Meaning": http://peasoup.typepad.com/peasoup/2011/05/scanlon-on-blame-part-3-criminal-blame-and-meaning.html

Posted by: Doug Portmore | Aug 30, 2011 8:25:49 AM

David Lewis's On The Plurality of Worlds: Summary

Posted by: Anna Alexandrova | Aug 30, 2011 11:12:27 AM

I offer,
"Almost full circle: the psychological evolution of creative radicalism up through the virtual takeover" -

http://www.amandasilbernagel.com/?p=1380

Posted by: Amanda Silbernagel | Aug 30, 2011 2:52:35 PM

http://deontologistics.wordpress.com/2010/08/06/on-ereignis/

Posted by: G | Aug 30, 2011 2:52:57 PM

I'd like to nominate this post:

http://lapisphilosophorum333.blogspot.com/2011/05/there-aint-nothin-about-mary.html

Posted by: NChenn | Aug 30, 2011 3:35:57 PM

Nietzsche on Agency and the Will

http://narziss.net/post/5763268549

Posted by: Carlos Narziss | Aug 30, 2011 3:41:29 PM

The Confucian Worldview: A Rational Reconstruction

http://www.religiousleftlaw.com/2011/04/the-confucian-worldview-a-rational-reconstruction.html#more

Posted by: Patrick S. O'Donnell | Aug 30, 2011 5:30:50 PM

I proffer:

Epistemic Trust and Understanding in a Model of Scientific Knowledge: http://www.oldtranslations.com/?p=426

Posted by: Olivander | Aug 30, 2011 6:22:44 PM

"An Old Man From Jersey Explains Philosophy" -Fixed Link

http://wisesloth.wordpress.com/2010/12/13/an-old-man-from-jersey-explains-philosophy/

Posted by: Travis | Aug 31, 2011 6:07:51 AM

From PEA Soup: the discussion of Slingerland's paper on Situationism and Confucian Virtue ethics with commentary from Rachana Kametekar:

http://peasoup.typepad.com/peasoup/2011/03/ethics-discussions-at-pea-soup-edward-slingerlands-the-situationist-critique-and-early-confucian-vir-1.html

Posted by: Eric | Aug 31, 2011 9:47:32 AM

A careful attempt to educate William Lane Craig.

Posted by: JH | Sep 1, 2011 10:16:53 AM

Can be found at: http://rationesola.blogspot.com/2011/04/william-l-craigs-knock-down-argument.html

Best philosophy blog of the year so far.

Posted by: JH | Sep 1, 2011 10:20:11 AM

My shameless self-nomination:

Potential and Possession: a Common Conflation

http://fledphil.blogspot.com/2011/08/potential-and-possession-common.html

I'm looking forward to reading a lot of these, this is a great way to find some real gems! Good luck everyone!

Posted by: J.R. | Sep 1, 2011 4:19:05 PM

Demarcation's revisited demise:

http://thekindlyones.org/2010/12/21/demarcations-revisited-demise/

Posted by: Paul | Sep 1, 2011 6:47:20 PM

from PEA Soup: Jussi Suikkanen's "Williams, Thick Concepts, and Reasons." Readable but sufficiently robust. And a bunch of folks working together to get to the bottom of an issue, as a topic-oriented, academic blog post should do.

http://peasoup.typepad.com/peasoup/2011/01/williams-thick-concepts-and-reasons.html

Posted by: Dan Boisvert | Sep 3, 2011 10:06:54 AM

I'd like to nominate Namit Arora's essay, What Do We Deserve? To answer this question, he looks at the work of American political philosophers Michael Sandel and John Rawls.

http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2011/03/what-do-we-deserve.html

Posted by: Usha | Sep 3, 2011 11:23:22 PM

Bentham, Sacred Values, and Ideal Theory:

http://colinfarrelly.blogspot.com/2011/02/bentham-sacred-values-and-ideal-theory.html

Posted by: Colin Farrelly | Sep 3, 2011 11:29:28 PM

I humbly submit yet another skeptical look at X-Phi, with some analysis of what a "true self" might be:

http://endsofthought.blogspot.com/2011/06/x-phi-true-selves-and-what-philosophy.html

Posted by: Roman | Sep 4, 2011 12:12:20 AM

Goodness is a Factual Matter (Goodness=Effectiveness)

http://freethoughtblogs.com/camelswithhammers/2011/01/23/goodness-is-a-factual-matter-goodnesseffectiveness/

It's the first of a longer (on-going) series.

Posted by: Camels With Hammers | Sep 4, 2011 8:53:10 AM

Heck, I better self-nominate too, or there won't be too many 3QD posts:

http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2011/02/why-should-we-care-about-kant.html

Posted by: Dave M | Sep 5, 2011 2:08:42 AM

I propose:

http://blog.philotropes.org/post/2011/09/02/Singer-s-problem-for-heroes

Posted by: Nicolas | Sep 5, 2011 4:03:05 AM

The evolution of feminism - for the every(wo)man:

Radical Feminized Thoughts

http://unfinishedscript.wordpress.com/2011/09/05/radical-feminized-thoughts/

Posted by: unfinishedscript | Sep 5, 2011 11:18:52 AM

I'm not sure this belongs to the appropriate genre but it does tackle a question that has traditionally concerned philosophers:

http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2011/05/a-perspective-on-conconsciousness.html

Posted by: Quinn O'Neill | Sep 5, 2011 11:19:52 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to this blog's feed  

PayAnywhere with iphone credit card swiper

Android Tablet

Bluetooth Headset

2013 New Style Dresses

Compare Car Rental Prices

DHgate.com Wholesale

3QD on Facebook

3QD on Kindle

3QD by Daily Email

Receive all blogposts at the same time every day.

Enter your Email:


Preview 3QD Email

3QD on Twitter

Miscellany

Lijit Search

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google

Recent Comments

Richard H. Randall on Obama must Make Fighting Climate Change National Project, or Die the death of a thousand Scandals

seth edenbaum on The First New Atheist? Kierkegaard

waqnis on Mortify Our Wolves

nogodrod on KFC smugglers bring buckets of chicken through Gaza tunnels

waqnis on Here’s how to change the world

Fernando on Mortify Our Wolves

seth edenbaum on The case against empathy

Dredd on Mortify Our Wolves

Max on Here’s how to change the world

Rohana on Mortify Our Wolves

Raza Husain on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

mirel on If Only We Had A Leader Like Chavez, Who Solved Real Problems -- Instead Of Debating Fake Ones Like The Deficit

araldo on Here’s how to change the world

Elatia Harris on Here’s how to change the world

Sundar on Here’s how to change the world

araldo on Here’s how to change the world

prasad on Here’s how to change the world

araldo on Thursday Poem

Raza Husain on Here’s how to change the world

prasad on Here’s how to change the world

Raza Husain on Here’s how to change the world

prasad on Here’s how to change the world

Jim Sanders on the hudson review

Ian Kaplan on Stephen Wolfram: Dropping In on Gottfried Leibniz

Sundar on Here’s how to change the world

Acclaim For 3QD


"I couldn't tear myself away from 3 Quarks Daily, to the point of neglecting my work. Congratulations on this superb site."—Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University.

"I have placed 3 Quarks Daily at the head of my list of web bookmarks."—Richard Dawkins, Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.

"Just wanted you to know I’m one of many who reads and enjoys 3 Quarks....almost daily."—David Byrne, musician, former lead-singer of the Talking Heads, artist, intellectual.

Read more here.

The 3QD Prizes

Subscribe to this blog's feed