June 07, 2011
Who created Ratko Mladic?
Slavenka Drakulic in Eurozine:
Ratko Mladic will now be judged in a court of law, which is the only way to determine whether an individual is guilty or innocent. But is his individual guilt ā as well as that of other war criminals on all sides ā all it boils down to? After the terrible wars that ravaged the former Yugoslav republics of Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo, leaving at least 100,000 dead and a million homeless, can Mladic's trial be the end of the story?
n his first hearing in Belgrade, addressing the judge and all present, Mladic said "Don't blame me, it is you who elected Milosevic. Tko vam je kriv! (Who else is to blame!)" Certainly, he was trying to evade his own guilt by implying that he was only following orders. Although he rejected the authority of the ICTY and the charges against him, this will presumably be his line of defence. After all, Karadzic was his commander-in-chief as the president of Republika Srpska. But Mladic did have a point. If he is to be tried, what about citizens who repeatedly voted for Milosevic and Karadzic and their policies of nationalism, hatred and war? What about the responsibility of voters who, by casting their votes, made Mladic's war crimes possible? By sending him to The Hague, are they washing their own hands while marching towards the EU?
Is there such a thing as collective political responsibility? That is the question every side avoids asking. Certainly, it is impossible to talk of the collective guilt of an entire population, be it the Serbs or any other nation. But can the citizens of Serbia (or Bosnia or Croatia), who voted time and again for nationalist leaders who led them into destructive wars, truly believe that they had no part in the transformation of Mladic into a war criminal?
Posted by Robin Varghese at 12:06 PM | Permalink






















Comments
Citizens authorise their representatives to act in their name, but only individuals can act. So only individuals can be guilty of evil acts. It makes no sense to say that a nation can be collectively guilty of the actions of individuals. The very idea is ghastly.
But there can be national shame, and in the case of the Yugoslav wars that should not be limited to the Serbs.
Posted by: Philosopher's Beard | Jun 7, 2011 4:53:13 PM
@Philosopher's beard that said: 'It makes no sense to say that a nation can be collectively guilty of the actions of individuals."
Of course that in the end there are individuals or groups of individuals that are acting and most of the population( that voted, heard about those actions and profit) in staying at home, drinking coffee and watching the soccer games.
The narrative of Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Serbs, neighbors that killed each other is too near in time to us to pass a clear judgement, but in the Nazi Germany's case, we may see the responsability of an entire nation to crime. We may say the contrary about Germany as here in Serbia-Bosnia-Croatia lands: Some individuals are not guilty of evil acts.The nations are guilty.
...Who created Ratko Mladic? The stupidity, the nationalism, the flags and "the holly earth of motherland"...Now the Bosnians, Croats, Serbians want to belong to European Union with no borders and with one currency.
Posted by: Mirel | Jun 8, 2011 9:02:26 AM
I don't agree that the collective was responsible. Ratko Mladic himself made a lot of the decisions and advanced in the war to kill many people with his team. He deserves to be punished for his crimes, and so do all others who participated.
Posted by: Intel-Central | Jun 19, 2011 11:18:00 AM
Ratko, Eichmann and co are of course the guilty actors of this tragedy; their nations are the chorus and the profiteers of their actions; in the Dante's inferno are many levels..
Posted by: Mirel | Jun 22, 2011 5:02:00 AM
Post a comment